Journal Information
Vol. 94. Issue 1.
Pages 1-2 (January - February 2018)
Vol. 94. Issue 1.
Pages 1-2 (January - February 2018)
Open Access
Preterm birth: temporal trends and socioeconomic inequalities
Nascimento prematuro: tendências temporais e desigualdades socioeconômicas
Seungmi Yanga,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Michael S. Kramera,b
a McGill University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Montreal, Canada
b McGill University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal, Canada
Related content
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018;94:15-2210.1016/j.jped.2017.02.003
Ana Daniela Izoton de Sadovsky, Alicia Matijasevich, Iná S. Santos, Fernando C. Barros, Angelica Espinosa Miranda, Mariangela Freitas Silveira
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Full Text

Socioeconomic inequalities in perinatal health have been consistently observed across many high- and low-middle income countries.1 Quantifying and monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in health is an important first step toward reducing health inequity and improving population health.

Brazil has long been ranked among the countries with the largest inequalities in both socioeconomic position and health.2,3 In this issue of the Jornal de Pediatria, Sadovsky et al.4 report income inequalities in preterm birth (PTB, <37 completed weeks of gestation) in the city of Pelotas over a 30-year period. The authors estimated the slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII) of income in PTB rates among almost all births in Pelotas in 1982, 1993, 2004, and 2011.

Relative and absolute health differences between groups provide different and complementary information, which can lead to different conclusions, particularly when the focus is monitoring changes in inequality over a prolonged time period.5 Proportions of a population within any socioeconomic group – e.g., individuals with a university education – inevitably change over time and may differ by geographic region. The SII and RII incorporate these changes in size of each group and yield inequality estimates that are comparable across time and place. However, SII and RII are based on a linear association between socioeconomic position and health,6 and therefore assume that each step up in income quintile results in an equivalent change in PTB rate. According to Table 2, the linear trend appears to hold for the 2004 cohort, but the patterns for the other cohorts suggest more of a threshold effect. That may help explain the absence of significant socioeconomic inequalities in those other cohorts.

Sadovsky et al.’s synthesis provides a useful contribution to understanding temporal changes in income inequalities in PTB in Pelotas. Nonetheless, relevant questions remain unanswered. An important observation is that overall PTB rates increased substantially over time, irrespective of income, while income-based inequalities in PTB were observed only among 2004 births after adjusting for potential confounding factors. In fact, temporal changes in PTB rates across cohorts were far greater than differences by income quintiles within cohorts. The fact that the PTB rate dropped slightly in 2011 may reflect the inclusion criteria for Intergrowth-21, which restricted recruitment to low-risk women.7 The temporal increase is likely to reflect major changes in obstetric practices, i.e., labor induction and/or pre-labor cesarean delivery, which affected all income quintiles. In addition to examining within-cohort changes, exploring the factors contributing to the strong temporal trends across cohorts would be very informative. The obesity epidemic and clear socioeconomic pattern of overweight/obesity in Brazil8 may also help explain the observed increase in PTB over time, and perhaps even the negative association between income and PTB observed within cohorts.

In the Discussion section, the authors note that the PTB rate was substantially lower in the Northeast region (10.2% in 1998), the poorest area in Brazil, when compared with that in Pelotas (10.9% in 1993 and >13% in both 2004 and 2011) in the Southeast region, the richest area of the country. This opposite socioeconomic pattern within Brazil reinforces our point above about healthcare practices. Women living in urban areas in the Southeast (particularly those with higher income) are more likely to have access to private health care, and hence to labor induction and pre-labor cesarean delivery, including those procedures carried out prior to 37 completed weeks. This might also help explain the fact that PTB rates in Pelotas are higher than the Brazilian national average.

Finally, subdividing overall PTB by gestational age helps to understand its neonatal health consequences (which differ substantially by gestational age). Subdividing by birth weight, however, can be misleading. Birth weight is of course highly dependent on gestational age, but the low birth weight (LBW) cut-off of <2500g does not account for the fact that preterm infants have lower mean birth weights at every preterm gestational age than fetuses who remained in utero at the same gestational age. In our opinion, it would be more useful to subdivide PTB into spontaneous (due to spontaneous preterm labor or preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes) vs. iatrogenic (labor induction or pre-labor cesarean delivery before term for maternal or fetal indications, or for non-medical reasons). The frequency of iatrogenic PTB has increased in high- and middle-income countries, including Brazil,9 and iatrogenic PTB for non-medical reasons account for a large proportion of total iatrogenic PTBs.10 Given the temporal trend in iatrogenic PTB in Brazil, assessing income inequalities in spontaneous vs. iatrogenic PTB would help inform clinical practice and public health policy in the country.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

M.S. Kramer, L. Seguin, J. Lydon, L. Goulet.
Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 14 (2000), pp. 194-210
M. Marmot.
Brazil: rapid progress and the challenge of inequality.
Int J Equity Health, 15 (2016), pp. 177
C. Landmann-Szwarcwald, J. Macinko.
A panorama of health inequalities in Brazil.
Int J Equity Health, 15 (2016), pp. 174
A.D. Sadovsky, A. Matijasevich, I.S. Santos, F.C. Barros, A.E. Miranda, M.F. Silveira.
Socioeconomic inequality in preterm birth in four Brazilian birth cohort studies.
J Pediatr (Rio J), 94 (2018), pp. 15-22
S. Harper, J. Lynch.
Measuring health inequalities.
Methods in social epidemiology, pp. 134-168
J.P. Mackenbach, A.E. Kunst.
Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe.
Soc Sci Med, 44 (1997), pp. 757-771
J. Villar, D.G. Altman, M. Purwar, J.A. Noble, H.E. Knight, P. Ruyan, et al.
The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
V.S. Silva, I. Souza, D.A. Silva, M.J. Fonseca.
Prevalence and factors associated with overweight in adults – Brazil, 2008–2009.
Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum, 16 (2014), pp. 161-170
H. Blencowe, S. Cousens, M.Z. Oestergaard, D. Chou, A.B. Moller, R. Narwal, et al.
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications.
Lancet, 379 (2012), pp. 2162-2172
C. Gyamfi-Bannerman, K.M. Fuchs, O.M. Young, M.K. Hoffman.
Nonspontaneous late preterm birth: etiology and outcomes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 205 (2011), pp. 456.e1-456.e6

Please cite this article as: Yang S, Kramer MS. Preterm birth: temporal trends and socioeconomic inequalities. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018;94:1–2.

See paper by Sadovsky et al. in pages 15–22.

Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)
Article options
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.