Journal Information
Vol. 100. Issue 3.
Pages 263-266 (May - June 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
2374
Vol. 100. Issue 3.
Pages 263-266 (May - June 2024)
Original article
Full text access
Frequency of perfume in 398 children's cosmetics
Visits
2374
Marjorie Uber
Corresponding author
marjorieu@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Mariana A.P. Morgan, Maria Carolina Schneider, Izabella R.R. Gomes, Renata R. Imoto, Vânia O. Carvalho, Kerstin T. Abagge
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Pediatria, Divisão de Dermatologia Pediátrica, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Total number of children's cosmetics included in each category and percentage of which had Parfum in their ingredient list.
Abstract
Objective

Perfume (Parfum) or fragrance is a natural or synthetic cosmetic ingredient added to emit a pleasant aroma or to improve the odor of a cosmetic formula. It is a mixture of substances, not revealed by the manufacturer, which may contain ingredients with allergenic potential, endocrine disruptors, and other possible harmful effects on human health. This study aims to analyze children's cosmetics labels to assess the presence of Perfume.

Methods

The researchers randomly visited points of sale in Curitiba, the capital of a southern Brazilian state; in order to catalog the largest possible number of children's cosmetics items.

Results

398 children's cosmetics were analyzed and found Parfum on 295 (74.1 %) of the labels, including 90.4 and 79,1 % of the shampoos and wet wipes, respectively.

Conclusion

Exposure of children's skin to fragrances can lead to local side effects such as allergies, but also to systemic effects, and the lack of knowledge of the general population and health professionals about its possible deleterious effects emphasizes the importance of changes in the regulation of cosmetics aiming to reduce the use of this ingredient.

Keywords:
Cosmetics
Cosmetic labeling
Perfume
Endocrine disruptors
Allergens
Full Text
Introduction

Exposure to chemicals begins prenatally and continues after birth, primarily through personal care products. This exposure can negatively impact children's health due to the immaturity of organs and systems. Children's skin has a thinner stratum corneum and therefore is more susceptible to the penetration of irritants and allergens. Also, children have a higher body surface-to-weight ratio which leads to greater absorption of substances applied to the skin.1

In most countries, regulations on children's cosmetics differ from that of adults. But even so, they are based on current but still limited scientific knowledge about the effect of cosmetic ingredients. After years of using a certain component, it is possible that new evidence can refute its safety and it would be prohibited.

A fragrance is a mixture of substances added to provide a pleasant aroma or mask an unpleasant odor to a formula, and identified in a cosmetic ingredient list simply as “Parfum”.2,3 Its origin can be natural, derived from organic materials, such as essential oils or natural extracts; or synthesized from a mixture of chemical products.1,4 Generally, the exact components of the mixture are not disclosed by the manufacturer, since it's not mandatory by the legislation – it's a “trade secret” supported by marketing strategies, which makes information about the safety of the compounds limited.3 Cosmetic label regulation varies worldwide, and in many countries, including Brazil, there are specific lists of ingredients that must be disclosed separately in the label (e.g. Amyl cinnamal, Coumarin, Eugenol, Geraniol, Benzyl benzoate, Citronellol, Farnesol, d-Limonene, Linalool), whilst others are disclosed only as “Parfum”.3

Since fragrances are frequently used in daily personal care products worldwide, the present work describes its presence on the labels of over-the-counter children's products in the southern Brazilian capital and aims to inform the population and health professionals about its high frequency and potential risks.

Methods

From February to December 2021, the researchers randomly visited various points of sale (pharmacies, cosmetics stores and markets) in a range of 15 km from downtown Curitiba, the capital of a southern Brazilian state with a population of 1.7 million, in order to catalog the largest possible number of children's cosmetics items. All cosmetics found on those stores, in each category, were included, as long as infant use was expressly indicated in the label, regardless of price or other characteristics.

The following categories of children's cosmetics were included: liquid soaps, bar soaps, shampoos, conditioners, moisturizers, diaper rash prevention creams, wet wipes, sunscreens and repellents. All evaluated products were indicated for use by children (packages stated “children”, “kids” or “baby”).

The labels were photographed and the lists of ingredients in the INCI nomenclature (International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients) were extracted to a Microsoft Excel® software spreadsheet. The fragrances were identified in the ingredient list with the term “Parfum/Fragrance”.

As this is not a study with humans, there was no need to submit the study to the ethics committee.

Results

Three hundred and ninety-eight products were evaluated and 295 (74.1 %) had Parfum/Fragrance on their labels. The total number of products included in each category and the number and percentage of those that had Parfum/Fragrance in their composition are described in Table 1.

Table 1.

Total number of children's cosmetics included in each category and percentage of which had Parfum in their ingredient list.

Category  Number os products  N of products with Parfum (%) 
Shampoos  83  75 (90.4 %) 
Wet wipes  91  72 (79.1 %) 
Hair conditioners  61  54 (88.5 %) 
Liquid soaps  46  36 (78.3 %) 
Diaper rash creams  28  13 (46.4 %) 
Moisturizers  28  13 (46.4 %) 
Insect repelents  20  11 (55.0 %) 
Bar soaps  12  11 (91.7 %) 
Sunscreens  29  10 (34.5 %) 
Discussion

Shampoos, wet wipes, and conditioners were the products that most had parfum in their composition and are widely used in the pediatric age group.

In 2008, White and McFadden analyzed 38 cosmetic products marketed for babies and found that 84 % (32) of them had fragrance chemicals,5 more than the present results - 74.1 % (295). This may be explained because the authors only included “parfum”, but not other ingredients separately disclosed.

Phthalates, synthetic musks, and “sensitizers” are the most common groups of synthesized fragrance mixtures. In cosmetics, phthalates are used to prevent rapid evaporation of the scent, but they are also ingredients for the plastic industry, adhesives and detergents. Synthetic musks are mainly used for fragrance and fixation in cosmetics and household products, and sensitizers are chemicals with a high probability of causing allergic reactions in humans.2

Besides allergy, other effects have been related to fragrance compounds in various studies, such as endocrine disruption, genital malformations, infertility, precocious puberty, and neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity.2,6,7

Animal data point to a high sensitivity of the development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which have already been detected in the placenta and amniotic fluid and are associated with impaired fetal development.6 There has been a decrease in the age of onset of puberty in girls and boys over the last 30 years and the exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, in the environment and by cosmetics, may be related.6 Exposure to fragrance compounds may also be related to fetal growth restriction, as shown the study by Zhao et al., 2016, with 220 mother-newborn pairs, including 110 with fetal growth restriction newborns and 110 normal newborns. Maternal urine samples were collected during the third trimester and tested for 5 phthalate ester metabolites. The authors found alterations in placental IGF2 DNA methylation, that could be part of a pathway to adverse fetal growth.8

Besides phthalates, synthetic polycyclic musks may display estrogenic activities in vitro and in vivo effects depending on specific receptors.9 Also, low concentrations of some synthetic musks were found to have anti-progestogenic effects.10

Prenatal exposure to phthalates, measured by phthalate metabolite concentrations in maternal urine, was associated with behavior disorders, like problem-externalization, emotional control, aggression, and depression in children aged 4–9, through a specific questionnaire designed to assess executive cognitive function in children.11 A synthesis of many other studies that point to neurological consequences of fragrance compounds can be found at Pinkas et al., 2017, such as effects in different developmental stages on hippocampal structure, neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampus, and others.2

Ahern et al., 2022, in a Danish study with 1278.685 children, showed that exposure to phthalates from medically prescribed drugs, prenatally or after birth, was positively associated with the incidence of osteosarcoma and lymphoma before age 19 years.12 More studies are needed to clarify which childhood cancer cases could be avoided by reducing or eliminating the phthalate content of medications and other consumer products.12

Lee et al., 2016, in a review of the relationship between cancer progression and the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, found in vitro studies that indicated that several phthalates possess plausible anti-androgenic effects, which correlates with increased breast cancer risk and involvement in cancer metastasis (increased cell proliferation, tumor mobility and invasiveness of tumor cells).13

Natural fragrance compounds, botanical extracts, and essential oils are not risk-free. Phytochemicals such as linalool are potentially allergenic,14,15 and are present, e.g., in lavender essential oil (Lavandula angustifolia), used worldwide. Lavender and tea tree essential oils have been linked to gynecomastia in prepubertal males and premature thelarche in girls.16

White and McFadden, 2008, pointed to the possible relationship of haptens – found in many cosmetic ingredients, including fragrance compounds, with the development of atopic diseases. Haptens are small molecules that can, when combined to atopy-related proteins, bind to receptors and stimulate altered (Th2) immune response.5 Paradoxically, haptens are also present in rinse-off cleansing products and emollients for atopic dermatitis, as shown by Kunkiel et al., 2023.17

Exposure to fragrances can also lead to asthma, contact dermatitis (irritant or allergic), dyschromia, and photosensitivity.1,4,18 Irritant-type dermatitis occurs at the site of product application, such as in the armpits when using perfumed deodorants, or due to fragrances in other personal care products. Allergic-type dermatitis, on the other hand, has urticaria as a common presentation and frequently occurs after exposure to Balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae).4,18 The North American Contact Dermatitis Group estimates that allergic contact dermatitis occurs in 5.3 % to 11.3 % of the general population. In the analysis of the main allergens in patch tests in 2015/2016, three screening tests for fragrances were found relevant: Fragrance-Mix-1, Fragrance-Mix-2, and Myroxylon pereirae.19 Sensitive areas like the perineal region are more susceptible to allergic contact dermatitis by fragrances from wet wipes.20 In the present study, 79.1 % of the 91 wet wipes contained fragrance. Yu et al. in a North American study found the ingredient in 33.3 % of the 63 wet wipes analyzed. This difference can be explained because some products do not include the term “fragrance” on the ingredients, according to each country's legislation, but the individual components of the fragrance, such as linalool or geraniol, make identification difficult.20

In fact, a limitation of this study is that the authors only searched for the words "parfum" and "fragrance" in the cosmetics’ ingredients lists, but individual fragrance components were not included. Therefore, the number of products containing fragrances is also likely to be higher.

Due to the potential health risks posed by fragranced products, in the United States and Europe, initiatives to monitor and regulate fragrances in children's products are growing. Similar initiatives should be adopted worldwide.1 The lack of knowledge of the general population and health professionals, added to the remarkable presence of perfume in the daily routine of families, emphasizes the importance of further studies in this area. Health professionals and Pediatric Societies must demand improvement in regulation processes and ongoing monitoring to ensure the safety of children's skin products on the market.

References
[1]
J. Ravichandran, B.S. Karthikeyan, J. Jost, A. Samal.
An atlas of fragrance chemicals in children's products.
Sci Total Environ, 818 (2022),
[2]
A. Pinkas, C.L. Gonçalves, M. Aschner.
Neurotoxicity of fragrance compounds: a review.
Environ Res, 158 (2017), pp. 342-349
[3]
M.J. Reeder.
Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances.
Dermatol Clin, 38 (2020), pp. 371-377
[4]
M.A. Pastor-Nieto, M.E. Gatica-Ortega.
Ubiquity, hazardous effects, and risk assessment of fragrances in consumer products.
Curr Treat Options Allergy, 8 (2021), pp. 21-41
[5]
J.M. White, J.P. McFadden.
Exposure to haptens/contact allergens in baby cosmetic products.
Contact Derm, 59 (2008), pp. 176-177
[6]
D. Lopez-Rodriguez, D. Franssen, S. Heger, A.S. Parent.
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and their effects on puberty.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 35 (2021),
[7]
S. Patel.
Fragrance compounds: the wolves in sheep's clothings.
Med Hypotheses, 102 (2017), pp. 106-111
[8]
Y. Zhao, J. Chen, X. Wang, Q. Song, H.H. Xu, Y.H. Zhang.
Third trimester phthalate exposure is associated with DNA methylation of growth-related genes in human placenta.
Sci Rep, 6 (2016), pp. 33449
[9]
B. Van der Burg, R. Schreurs, S. van der Linden, W. Seinen, A. Brouwer, E. Sonneveld.
Endocrine effects of polycyclic musks: do we smell a rat?.
Int J Androl, 31 (2008), pp. 188-193
[10]
M. Khalid, M. Abdollahi.
Environmental distribution of personal care products and their effects on human health.
Iran J Pharm Res, 20 (2021), pp. 216-253
[11]
S.M. Engel, A. Miodovnik, R.L. Canfield, C. Zhu, M.J. Silva, A.M. Calafat, M.S. Wolff.
Prenatal phthalate exposure is associated with childhood behavior and executive functioning.
Environ Health Perspect, 118 (2010), pp. 565-571
[12]
T.P. Ahern, L.G. Spector, P. Damkier, B. Öztürk Esen, S.P. Ulrichsen, K. Eriksen, et al.
Medication-associated phthalate exposure and childhood cancer incidence.
J Natl Cancer Inst, 114 (2022), pp. 885-894
[13]
H.M. Lee, K.A. Hwang, K.C. Choi.
Diverse pathways of epithelial mesenchymal transition related with cancer progression and metastasis and potential effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on epithelial mesenchymal transition process.
Mol Cell Endocrinol, 457 (2017), pp. 103-113
[14]
J. Rudbäck, M.N. Islam, A. Börje, U. Nilsson, A.T. Karlberg.
Essential oils can contain allergenic hydroperoxides at eliciting levels, regardless of handling and storage.
Contact Derm, 73 (2015), pp. 253-254
[15]
J.M. White, A. Goossens.
Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis to linalyl acetate in a disinfectant spray.
Contact Derm, 83 (2020), pp. 412-413
[16]
J.T. Ramsey, Y. Li, Y. Arao, A. Naidu, L.A. Coons, A. Diaz, et al.
Lavender products associated with premature thelarche and prepubertal gynecomastia: case reports and endocrine-disrupting chemical activities.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 104 (2019), pp. 5393-5405
[17]
K. Kunkiel, M. Nędzi, A. Natkańska-Małek, W. Feleszko.
Haptens in bath and cleansing preparations used for atopic dermatitis: analysis of product composition.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol, 40 (2023), pp. 331-332
[18]
M. Kumar, A. Devi, M. Sharma, P. Kaur, U.K Mandal.
Review on perfume and present status of its associated allergens.
J Cosmet Dermatol, 20 (2021), pp. 391-399
[19]
DeKoven J.G., Warshaw E.M., Zug K.A., Maibach H.I., Belsito D.V., Sasseville D., et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2015-2016. Dermatitis. 2018;29:297–309.
[20]
J. Yu, J. Treat, K. Chaney, B. Brod.
Potential allergens in disposable diaper wipes, topical diaper preparations, and disposable diapers: under-recognized etiology of pediatric perineal dermatitis.
Dermatitis, 27 (2016), pp. 110-118
Download PDF
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate jped2@sbp.com.br. Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact jped2@sbp.com.br.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.