Journal Information
Visits
71
Review article
Full text access
Available online 17 April 2025
Surgical management for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Visits
71
Luís Fernando Ferreira Cavalcantea, Giovanna Costaa, Sophia Massafelli Battistutaa, Pedro Faria Makabea, Isadora Silva Fanucci Buenoa, Bruno Yuamotoa, Felipe Endrigo Gonçalves Vilelaa, Marco Aurélio Palazzi Sáfadib,
Corresponding author
masafadi@uol.com.br

Corresponding author.
a Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Pediatria, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (3)
Show moreShow less
Tables (1)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants from the included studies.
Tables
Abstract
Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management, specifically total and partial tonsillectomy, for Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, and Cervical Adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome, focusing on symptom resolution and recurrence reduction.

Data sources

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical to non-surgical management in children with PFAPA. Data extraction and quality assessment adhered to Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA protocols. Risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models.

Summary of findings

After the removal of duplicates, 31 studies were screened and 3 studies were included. Pooled analysis revealed a 72% reduction in persistent symptoms following surgical interventions compared to non-surgical management (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12–0.68, I² = 22%, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

The findings confirm that surgical management, including total and partial tonsillectomy, is an effective therapeutic option for PFAPA, with substantial benefits in symptom resolution and quality of life improvement. While surgery offers long-term benefits, its risks, and broader immunological implications require careful consideration. The study underscores the necessity for larger, multicenter trials to validate these findings across diverse populations and optimize treatment strategies.

Keywords:
Syndrome of periodic fever
Aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis
Tonsillectomy
Tonsillotomy
Randomized controlled trial
Meta-analysis
Abbreviations:
PFAPA
QoL
RCT(s)
PROSPERO
PRISMA
RoB 2
RR
CI
Full Text
Introduction

Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, and Cervical Adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is an idiopathic autoinflammatory disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of fever accompanied by pharyngitis, aphthous stomatitis, cervical adenitis, and leukocytosis, with an incidence estimated at 2.3 - 2.6/10,000 children under 5 years in certain populations [1,2]. Typically, the syndrome presents in early childhood, with onset often occurring between the ages of 2 and 5 years. Between episodes, patients have completely asymptomatic intervals, with normal growth and development[2–4]. Despite its self-limiting nature, PFAPA significantly impacts the quality of life for affected children and their families due to the frequent and predictable episodes of fever and associated symptoms. This cyclical burden can disrupt normal activities and impose psychological and logistical stress on families, as documented in studies emphasizing the profound family impact and diminished health-related quality of life (QoL) during episodes [5,6]. The difficulty in distinguishing episodes of PFAPA from bacterial tonsillitis often results in the overuse of antibiotics in young children, increasing the risk of adverse events, disrupting the microbiota, and contributing to antimicrobial resistance within the community [7].

Although the etiology of PFAPA remains poorly understood, emerging evidence suggests a multifactorial pathogenesis, including a genetic predisposition and dysregulation of innate immune responses. Recent findings have linked PFAPA to genetic variants shared with other autoinflammatory conditions, such as Behçet's disease and recurrent aphthous ulcers, providing clues about their potential underlying mechanisms [8–10]. Inflammatory markers typically normalize between episodes, underscoring the episodic nature of the disease and its differentiation from infectious etiologies [11].

Treatment options for PFAPA include corticosteroids, which are effective in aborting individual episodes but may increase recurrence frequency [1,3,12]. Other pharmacological preventive approaches, such as cimetidine, montelukast and colchicine, have been used to reduce the frequency and severity of the episodes, but results have shown limited, if any, efficacy [12–17].

Surgical interventions, particularly tonsillectomy, have gained attention for their potential to provide a curative solution. Observational studies as well as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) results suggest that total or partial tonsillectomy can significantly reduce or resolve PFAPA symptoms, with a reported efficacy of up to 90% in some cohorts [18–26]. However, the risks of surgical complications, including bleeding and postoperative pain, as well as the long-term immunological impact of these surgical interventions must be weighed against the benefits.

A Cochrane review, based on two small randomized controlled trials, concluded that tonsillectomy has shown significant benefits in children with PFAPA syndrome, including immediate and complete symptom resolution and reduced frequency and severity of episodes. However, the evidence was considered of moderate certainty due to limited sample sizes and applicability concerns. According to the authors’ conclusions, parents must balance surgical risks against medication alternatives, considering that PFAPA often resolves spontaneously, and medications can mitigate episode severity [19].

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of surgical interventions for PFAPA syndrome, specifically total and partial tonsillectomy, by analyzing randomized controlled trials. The authors seek to determine the impact of surgical treatment on symptom resolution, recurrence rates, and overall disease burden compared to non-surgical management. By consolidating the latest RCT evidence, this study provides a clearer understanding of the therapeutic potential of surgery, aiding clinicians and caregivers in making informed treatment decisions for children with PFAPA.

Material and methods

The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the protocol CRD42024569470 on DATA. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [27].

Eligibility criteria

The studies that met all the following eligibility criteria were included in this meta-analysis: (1) population of children with PFAPA at randomization; (2) intervention group with surgical management; (3) control group with non-surgical management; (4) randomized trials. In addition, studies were only included if there was a report of at least one outcome of interest.

Search strategy and data extraction

The authors systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases with each respective RCT filter according to The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions until August 2024 with the following search strategy: “PFAPA AND (tonsillectomy OR tonsillotomy OR adenoidectomy)”. Two authors (G.C. and S.B.) independently extracted the data following predefined search criteria and quality assessment.

Outcomes

The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients without symptoms of PFAPA after surgery or randomization.

Quality assessment

The authors evaluated the quality of the RCTs using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). This tool categorizes studies as having a high, low, or unclear risk of bias across five domains: selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting biases [28].

Statistical analysis

To compare effects for binary outcomes, the authors utilized risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics, with P values less than 0.10 and I² greater than 25% indicating significant heterogeneity. The authors employed the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and the random-effects analysis model via Review Manager for the outcome of interest.

ResultsStudy selection and characteristics

As detailed in Figure 1, the initial search yielded 61 registers. After the removal of duplicate records, 31 studies were screened. From these, three studies were included. A total of 81 patients were evaluated from 3 RCTs, of whom 41 (50.6%) were in the surgery group, and 40 (49.4%) in the placebo group. Study characteristics are reported in Table 1.

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram of study screening and selection.

(0.33MB).
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants from the included studies.

StudyInterventionNumber of patientsMean age (years)Female sex (%)Mean age at the onset of episodes (years)Duration of episodes (days)
Surgery  No treatment  Surgery  No treatment  Surgery  No treatment  Surgery  No treatment  Surgery  No treatment 
Renko [24]  Tonsillectomy  14  12  4.2  4.0  43  33  NA  NA  3.4  3.8 
Garavello [25]  Tonsillectomy andAdenoidectomy  19  20  5.4  4.9  53  65  2.9  3.1  3.3  3.5 
Lantto [26]  Tonsillotomy  3.9  4.5  50  25  3.8  3.0  3.5  4.2 

NA, not available.

Pooled analysis of all studies

Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PFAPA symptom persistence after surgery. The relative risk was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.12-0.68; I² = 22%; p = 0.005), indicating a 72% lower risk of persistent symptoms in the surgical group compared to the control group (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Pooled analysis of the proportion of patients without symptoms of PFAPA after surgery or randomization compared to non-surgical management.

(0.24MB).
Quality assessment

Individual RCT appraisal is reported in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Risk of bias assessment.

(0.25MB).
Discussion

This meta-analysis, which included three RCTs involving 81 children with PFAPA, provides compelling evidence for the efficacy of surgical interventions in reducing symptom persistence. The pooled analysis demonstrated a 72% lower risk of persistent symptoms in the surgical group compared to the control group, highlighting the significant therapeutic potential of tonsillectomy and related procedures.

The precise mechanisms underlying the observed efficacy of surgical interventions remain unclear and may be attributed to the removal of a potential nidus of inflammation within the tonsillar tissue, which is hypothesized to play a central role in the pathogenesis of PFAPA [2]. Genetic studies have also suggested that PFAPA is linked to dysregulated immune responses, which could be mitigated by surgical removal of lymphoid tissues [2,29].

Furthermore, the meta-analysis included evidence from recent RCT that investigated the efficacy of newer surgical techniques, such as partial tonsillectomy (tonsillotomy), adding consistency to previous trial results. Although with lower efficacy when compared to total tonsillectomy, tonsillotomy has shown promise in reducing postoperative complications (faster recovery times and lower levels of postoperative pain), making it an attractive alternative for certain patient populations [22,26,30].

Interestingly, partial tonsillectomy may preserve some of the immunological functions of the tonsillar tissue, potentially offering a balance between symptom relief and maintaining partial local immunity. This aspect is particularly relevant in light of findings that total tonsillectomy may increase the risk of viral infections, as observed during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic [31]. This suggests that the immunological role of the tonsils, particularly in pediatric patients, may provide protective barriers against upper respiratory tract infections. Future research is essential to understand the broader immunological consequences and to optimize surgical approaches to minimize adverse effects while maintaining the therapeutic benefits. Ultimately, the choice between total or partial tonsillectomy should be guided by patient-specific factors, including the severity of symptoms, the risk of complications, and the anticipated long-term benefits.

The findings of this meta-analysis, which included only randomized clinical trials, are corroborated by the results of several other observational, retrospective studies that also found these surgical interventions associated with better outcomes and reduced frequency, duration, and intensity of postoperative episodes in PFAPA syndrome [22,23]. In addition to symptom resolution, surgical interventions appear to also significantly improve QoL for both patients and their families. Studies have shown that parents of children undergoing surgical treatment reported reduced stress and improved overall family dynamics [32,33]. These improvements, together with the potential reduction in the inappropriate use of antibiotics during episodes of PFAPA [7], underscore the broader impact of effective management beyond symptom relief.

Although this study primarily focuses on the efficacy of surgical interventions, it is important to consider how tonsillectomy compares to pharmacological treatments such as corticosteroids, colchicine, and cimetidine. Corticosteroids are known to effectively abort individual episodes but may increase recurrence rates. Colchicine and cimetidine have been explored as potential preventive treatments, but their efficacy remains inconsistent [12–17]. Compared to these medical therapies, tonsillectomy offers a more definitive resolution of symptoms, reducing the frequency of episodes and improving quality of life.

While this meta-analysis demonstrates the efficacy of surgical interventions for PFAPA, several limitations warrant consideration. The small sample sizes and predominantly European focus of the included studies restrict the generalizability of the findings. The small sample size may impact the statistical power of these findings and limit the ability to detect potential differences in treatment outcomes. Regional differences in healthcare access, genetic predispositions, and environmental factors could influence treatment outcomes. Future research should aim to evaluate surgical interventions in larger sample sizes and more diverse populations to determine whether these factors affect the effectiveness of tonsillectomy. Studies conducted in non-European regions could provide valuable insights into potential variations in patient responses to surgery. For instance, the presence of certain MEFV autoinflammatory gene variants has been associated with a higher frequency of surgical failures [34], underscoring the need for geographically diverse trials. Moreover, factors such as age of onset, specific symptom patterns, and coexisting conditions like Familial Mediterranean Fever may influence individual responses to tonsillectomy [35,36]. Despite these limitations, the results presented in this meta-analysis are consistent with other studies in diverse populations, such as the Turkish cohort by Yıldız M et al.,[37] which reported a 95.4% resolution rate of PFAPA cases following tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy. Finally, the limited long-term follow-up data in the included randomized controlled trials restricts our understanding of the durability of surgical benefits and the potential for late complications, such as recurrent infections or scarring [31,33]. Future research should prioritize larger, multi-center trials with diverse populations and extended follow-up periods to address these limitations.

A notable challenge in studying PFAPA is its underdiagnosis due to limited awareness and the absence of specific diagnostic biomarkers. This gap not only hampers accurate prevalence estimates but also restricts the feasibility of large-scale trials. Future research should aim to identify reliable biomarkers and to improve diagnosis and predict treatment response. Elucidating these mechanisms will be of paramount importance to pave the way to optimize surgical or even non-surgical therapeutic innovations.

Lastly, pediatricians and healthcare providers must balance the risks of surgery, including anesthesia-related complications and potential postoperative bleeding, against its benefits. Clear guidelines and shared decision-making with families are crucial to optimizing outcomes and aligning treatment strategies with patient and family priorities.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis underscores the efficacy of surgical interventions, particularly tonsillectomy, in reducing the persistence of PFAPA symptoms. While the findings support the role of surgery as a viable treatment option, further research is needed to address the limitations of existing studies, including small sample sizes, geographic constraints, and limited long-term data. Future investigations should prioritize larger, multicenter trials and explore the underlying mechanisms of PFAPA to optimize treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

Funding

This study was not funded.

References
[1]
J. Førsvoll, E.K. Kristoffersen, K. Øymar.
Incidence, clinical characteristics and outcome in Norwegian children with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome; a population-based study.
Acta Paediatr, 102 (2013), pp. 187-192
[2]
K. Rydenman, H. Fjeld, J. Hätting, S. Berg, A. Fasth, P. Wekell.
Epidemiology and clinical features of PFAPA: A retrospective cohort study of 336 patients in western Sweden.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J, 15 (2022), pp. 82
[3]
J. Hausmann, F. Dedeoglu, L. Broderick.
periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome and syndrome of unexplained recurrent fevers in children and adults.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 11 (2023), pp. 1676-1687
[4]
A. Wang, K. Manthiram, F. Dedeoglu, GR. Licameli.
Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: A review.
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 27 (2021), pp. 166-173
[5]
C. Grimwood, I. Kone-Paut, M. Piram, L. Rossi-Semerano, V. Hentgen.
Health-related quality of life in children with PFAPA syndrome.
Orphanet J Rare Dis, 9 (2018), pp. 132
[6]
C. Sparud-Lundin, S. Berg, A. Fasth, A. Karlsson, P. Wekell.
From uncertainty to gradually managing and awaiting recovery of a periodic condition- a qualitative study of parents´ experiences of PFAPA syndrome.
BMC Pediatr, 8 (2019), pp. 99
[7]
K. Rydenman, S. Berg, A. Karlsson-Bengtsson, A. Fasth, P. Wekell.
Antibiotic prescriptions to children with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis.
Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor, 113 (1992), pp. 1927-1933
[8]
K. Manthiram, E. Nesbitt, T. Morgan, KM. Edwards.
Family history in periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome.
Pediatrics, 138 (2016),
[9]
S.A. Di Gioia, N. Bedoni, A. von Scheven-Gête, F. Vanoni, A. Superti-Furga, M. Hofer, et al.
Analysis of the genetic basis of periodic fever with aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome.
Sci Rep, 5 (2015),
[10]
K. Manthiram, S. Preite, F. Dedeoglu, S. Demir, S. Ozen, K.M. Edwards, et al.
Common genetic susceptibility loci link PFAPA syndrome, Behçet's disease, and recurrent aphthous stomatitis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117 (2020), pp. 14405-14411
[11]
D. Rigante.
The broad-ranging panorama of systemic autoinflammatory disorders with specific focus on acute painful symptoms and hematologic manifestations in children.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis, 10 (2018),
[12]
S. Peridis, G. Pilgrim, E. Koudoumnakis, I. Athanasopoulos, M. Houlakis, K. Parpounas.
PFAPA syndrome in children: a meta-analysis on surgical versus medical treatment.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 74 (2010), pp. 1203-1208
[13]
D. Tasher, M. Stein, I. Dalal, E. Somekh.
Colchicine prophylaxis for frequent periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis episodes.
Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor, 97 (1992), pp. 1090-1092
[14]
P. Dusser, V. Hentgen, B. Neven.
Koné-Paut I. Is colchicine an effective treatment in periodic fever, aphtous stomatitis, pharyngitis, cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome?.
Joint Bone Spine, 83 (2016), pp. 406-411
[15]
MB. Lierl.
Efficacy of montelukast for treatment of periodic fever with aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA).
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 121 (2008), pp. S228
[16]
V.M. Wurster, J.G. Carlucci, H.M. Feder, KM. Edwards.
Long-term follow-up of children with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis syndrome.
J Pediatr, 159 (2011), pp. 958-964
[17]
C. Gaggiano, D. Rigante, J. Sota, S. Grosso, L. Cantarini.
Treatment options for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome in children and adults: a narrative review.
Clin Rheumatol, 38 (2019), pp. 11-17
[18]
J.S. Abramson, L.B. Givner, JN. Thompson.
Possible role of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children with recurrent fever and tonsillopharyngitis.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 8 (1989), pp. 119-120
[19]
M.J. Burton, A.J. Pollard, J.D. Ramsden, L.Y. Chong, RP. Venekamp.
Tonsillectomy for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 12 (2019),
[20]
O. Guntinas-Lichius, K. Geißler, T. Asendorf, R. Tostmann, J. Löhler.
Tonsillectomy versus tonsillotomy for recurrent acute tonsillitis in children and adults (TOTO): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial.
[21]
M. Hofer.
Why and how should we treat periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome?.
Pediatr Drugs, 22 (2020), pp. 243-250
[22]
T. Banh Chong, O. Sagot, M. Alexis, C. Brehin, K. Brochard, Y. Gallois.
Efficacy of partial tonsillectomy in periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome: a STROBE retrospective observational study.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, S1879-7296 (2024),
[23]
U.C. Ezeh, P.J. Kahn, MM. April.
Management of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, adenitis with intracapsular tonsillectomy.
Laryngoscope, 134 (2024), pp. 1967-1969
[24]
M. Renko, E. Salo, A. Putto-Laurila, H. Saxen, P.S. Mattila, J. Luotonen, et al.
A randomized, controlled trial of tonsillectomy in periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome.
J Pediatr, 151 (2007), pp. 289-292
[25]
W. Garavello, M. Romagnoli, RM. Gaini.
Effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in PFAPA syndrome: a randomized study.
J Pediatr, 155 (2009), pp. 250-253
[26]
U. Lantto, T. Tapiainen, T. Pokka, P. Koivunen, M. Helminen, J. Piitulainen, et al.
Tonsillotomy for periodic fever syndrome: a randomized and controlled trial.
Laryngoscope, 134 (2024), pp. 968-972
[27]
M.J. Page, J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, et al.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
BMJ, 372 (2021), pp. n71
[28]
J.A. Sterne, J. Savović, M.J. Page, R.G. Elbers, N.S. Blencowe, I. Boutron, et al.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ, 366 (2019), pp. l4898
[29]
I. Luu, A. Sharma, M. Guaderrama, M. Peru, J. Nation, N. Page, et al.
Immune dysregulation in the tonsillar microenvironment of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome.
J Clin Immunol, 40 (2020), pp. 179-190
[30]
U. Kisser, K. Stelter, C. Lill.
Total versus subtotal tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis: 5-year follow up of a prospective randomized noninferiority clinical trial.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 282 (2025), pp. 1421-1425
[31]
R. Murugesan, P. Sagar, R. Kumar, S.K. Kabra, P.K. Chaturvedi, M.A. Khan, et al.
Long term impact of adeno-tonsillectomy on immunity against respiratory viral infections; evidence deduced during COVID-19 pandemic.
Indian J Pediatr, 92 (2025), pp. 383-389
[32]
K. Rydenman, C. Sparud-Lundin, A. Karlsson-Bengtsson, S. Berg, A. Fasth, P. Wekell.
Tonsillectomy reduces the family impact of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome and improves health-related quality of life in affected children.
Orphanet J Rare Dis, 18 (2023), pp. 153
[33]
S. Bennett, J. Gao, E. Osen, T. Myuran.
Long-term impact of paediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy on the paediatric throat disorders outcome test: A prospective observational study.
J Laryngol Otol, 136 (2022), pp. 1066-1070
[34]
E. Pehlivan, A. Adrovic, S. Sahin, K. Barut, O. Kul Cınar, O. Kasapcopur.
PFAPA syndrome in a population with endemic familial mediterranean fever.
J Pediatr, 192 (2018), pp. 253-255
[35]
K. Manthiram.
What is PFAPA syndrome? Genetic clues about the pathogenesis.
Curr Opin Rheumatol, 35 (2023), pp. 423-428
[36]
E.D. Gozen, M. Yildiz, S. Kara, F. Tevetoglu, F. Haslak, A. Adrovic, et al.
Long-term efficacy of tonsillectomy/adenotonsillectomy in patients with periodic fever aphthous stomatitis pharyngitis adenitis syndrome with special emphasis on co-existence of familial Mediterranean fever.
Rheumatol Int, 43 (2023), pp. 137-145
[37]
M. Yıldız, F. Haslak, A. Adrovic, İ Ülkersoy, N. Gücüyener, S. Şahin, et al.
Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome: A single-center experience.
Turk Arch Pediatr, 57 (2022), pp. 46-52
Copyright © 2025. The Authors
Download PDF
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
A partir de 10 de fevereiro de 2025, haverá mudança no preço da taxa de publicação de todos os artigos que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Effective February 10, 2025, there will be changes in the Article Publishing Charge (APC) for all articles after peer review and acceptance in Jornal de Pediatria. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.