Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
117
Original article
Full text access
Available online 11 December 2024
Height and weight reference charts for Brazilians with intellectual disabilities aged 7–17
Visits
117
Adriana Nascimento de Souzaa, Fabio Bertapellia, Gil Guerra-Juniorb,
Corresponding author
gilguer@unicamp.br

Corresponding author.
a Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Centro de Investigação em Pediatria (CIPED), Laboratório de Crescimento e Desenvolvimento (LabCreD), Campinas, SP, Brazil
b Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Departamento de Pediatria, Divisão de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Campinas, SP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (2)
Table 1. Average, standard deviation (SD), L, M, S, and smoothed height percentiles in male and female children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities aged between 7 and 17 years.
Table 2. Average, standard deviation (SD), L, M, S, and smoothed weight percentiles in male and female children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities aged between 7 and 17 years.
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Objective

It was to develop smoothed height and weight percentiles for boys and girls with IDs between 7 and 17 years old.

Methods

The sample consisted of 1,047 young people (645 boys and 402 girls; 7–17 years old) with ID. A total of 4,059 measurements (height: n = 2,041; weight: n = 2,018) were retrospectively obtained from the period between 2013 and 2018. Smoothed height and weight percentiles were developed using the LMS method. Local and global diagnosis of percentiles were evaluated with Q statistics and detrended Q-Q plots.

Results

Percentiles (5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, and 95) for height-to-age and weight-to-age were developed with satisfactory modeling in boys and girls between 7 and 17 years old. Boys showed a linear trend in height up to 11 or 12 years old, an increment from 13 to 15 years old and a deceleration from 15 or 16 years old. For the girls, height was linear between the ages of 7 and 11, followed by a deceleration from the age of 12 and without substantial changes from the ages of 15 to 17. Regarding weight, girls showed a linear trend of weight gain until the age of 13 and deceleration at the age of 14 or 15. Boys, however, showed a linear tendency to gain weight from 7 to 17 years old.

Conclusion

The height and weight percentiles developed in this study can help monitor the growth of young people with ID.

Keywords:
Body weight
Body height
Growth and development
Growth disorders
Children with disabilities
Full Text
Introduction

Intellectual Disability (ID) is a condition characterized by limitations in cognitive functioning and adaptive behavior, manifesting before the age of 22, bringing several losses to the individual's full participation in society.1 ID occurs in around 1 to 3 % of the population, with a higher occurrence in young males, in low-income countries.2 According to data from the 2010 Demographic Census, there are at least 2.6 million (1.4 %) people with ID in Brazil.3 More recent data indicate that the occurrence of children with ID is equivalent to 0.85 %.4

Studies indicate a greater risk for physical and mental disorders, premature mortality and potentially preventable deaths among individuals with ID.5-7 In the population of children with ID, evidence suggests a greater risk for growth disorders and overweight.8 More specifically, studies suggest that young people with ID have smaller height and greater weight compared to young people without ID.9,10 However, there is a lack of data regarding growth patterns in the population of children with ID.

The absence of specific reference values ​​has resulted in the development of national references for growth in the population with ID. However, the charts were developed for children with ID associated with genetic conditions, such as Down,11 Willians,12,13 Rett,14 Rubinstein-Taybi,15 Prader-Willi16 syndromes, among others.

Genetic conditions are associated with lower height and weight compared to the general population of young people with ID,10 which may result in overestimated growth values ​​for young people with ID without associated genetic conditions. The development of height and weight percentiles should help in the construction of specific growth trajectories in the population with ID in order to guide public policies to prevent growth disorders in young people with ID.

Growth is a fundamental indicator of health and social development.17 To this end, growth charts have been developed and used to monitor height and weight in children.18-20 The charts are essential components for evaluating the general health status of the population. However, reference values used for children in the general population may be inadequate for monitoring the growth of young people with ID.21

The aim of the present study was to develop smoothed height-to-age and weight-to-age percentiles for Brazilian children and adolescents with ID, aged between 7 and 17 years.

MethodsSample

It contains individuals with ID of both sexes, aged between 7 and 17 years, from 45 cities in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Young people with recognized genetic conditions, cerebral palsy, or severe physical disabilities were excluded from the study. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (assessment n° 3.419.135) for the use of clinical records.

APAE health database – FEAPAES

Demographic data, height and weight were obtained from the APAE Health program – Federation of APAES of the State of Sao Paulo (FEAPAES-SP). FEAPAES is a non-profit organization dedicated to the promotion, dissemination and development of educational and health projects at specialized centers (APAES) for people with ID. The APAE Health program is a FEAPAES initiative and aims to obtain reliable and comparable data on nutritional conditions and cardiovascular profiles of samples from individuals with ID. FEAPAES coordinated data collection from APAES from the period between 2013 and 2018. First, in 2013, a pilot collection was carried out in two APAES, where a questionnaire was filled out, containing the following information: date of birth, age and sex. Next, APAES measured the height and weight of children and adolescents with ID. After the pilot study, all evaluators underwent training sessions, with professionals linked to APAES (Physical Education teachers, Nutritionists, Nurses, Physiotherapists). Data collection was carried out in 45 APAES. Height and weight data were obtained following standardized measurement protocols from APAE Health – FEAPAES. Height and weight were obtained using stadiometers and scales with precision of 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively. Measurements were taken with participants standing, wearing light clothing and without shoes.

Statistical analysis

The data was subjected to the cleaning process. Height and weight data were excluded under the following conditions: 1) height and weight data with duplicate ages (height: n = 332; weight: n = 315) and, 2) loss of height in the longitudinal sample (n = 61).

The LMS method was used to develop percentiles (5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90 and 95),22 using the LMSchartmaker Pro software.23 Values ​​of L, M and S represent the adjusted Box-Cox power, median and coefficient of variation, respectively. The LMS fits skewed data, using a Box-Cox normal distribution. The modeling diagnosis was based on Q statistics values ​​for L, M and S between −2 and +2 and detrended Q-Q plots (worm plots) using LMSchartmaker Pro. The diagnosis is based on choosing the best set of degrees of freedom for cubic splines and goodness-of-fit. The model was built with the “age original” option for age (i.e., without rescaling or transformations). The initial equivalent degrees of freedom (i.e., edf) for L, M, and S were 3, 5, and 3, respectively. The model checking was carried out following the recommendations of LMSchartmaker Pro: the authors initially sought to optimize the M, S and L chart, increasing or decreasing the edf by 1 unit. The height and weight percentiles of male individuals presented satisfactory diagnoses (Q statistics between −2 and +2), using initial edf (L = 3, M = 5, S = 3). Modeling for female weight percentiles resulted in the extrapolation of Q statistics values; the edf change in the M curve did not improve the modeling, requiring a decrease in the S curve by 1 unit (L = 3, M = 5, S = 2), which resulted in Q statistics within −2 and +2. To model height percentiles, the M curve was increased by 1 unit (L = 3, M = 6, S = 3). Worm plots for height and weight resulted in a linear trend within the recommendations of van Buuren and Fredriks.24 The modeling results can be seen in Supplementary Fig. 2 in the supplementary materials. L, M and S values ​​and smoothed height and weight percentiles were exported from LMSchartmaker to an Excel spreadsheet to create height and weight tables and charts. Frequency, mean, and standard deviation was calculated using SPSS, version 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

ResultsParticipants

The sample consisted of a total of 1047 children and adolescents (male: n = 645; 61.6 %; female: n = 402; 38.4 %) with ID, aged between 7 and 17 years. Participants provided 2041 height data (male = 1249; female: n = 792) and 2018 wt data (male: n = 1228; female: n = 790). The percentages of participants who presented one or more measurements were: 1 measurement (male: 57.4 %; female: 55.9 %); 2–3 measurements (male: 28.4 %; female: 29.6 %); and 4–6 measures (male: 14.2 %; female: 14.6 %). The number of height and weight measurements by sex and age are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1.

Average, standard deviation (SD), L, M, S, and smoothed height percentiles in male and female children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities aged between 7 and 17 years.

    Male (height, cm)
Age (years)  Average  SD  P5  P10  P25  P50  P75  P90  P95 
52  125.32  7.15  −0.3649  125.3823  0.0598  113.83  116.25  120.46  125.38  130.58  135.52  138.60 
64  131.68  7.67  0.0358  130.9153  0.0609  118.42  121.08  125.65  130.92  136.40  141.52  144.67 
96  136.03  8.96  0.5009  136.2581  0.0618  122.76  125.68  130.64  136.26  142.00  147.26  150.46 
10  97  142.54  8.90  1.0716  141.4928  0.0625  126.90  130.13  135.52  141.49  147.44  152.79  155.98 
11  123  145.28  8.70  1.6902  146.7092  0.0628  130.95  134.54  140.40  146.71  152.84  158.22  161.37 
12  116  151.77  9.91  2.2332  152.4456  0.0629  135.52  139.47  145.80  152.45  158.76  164.18  167.32 
13  134  157.84  10.40  2.5947  158.1908  0.0626  140.35  144.59  151.28  158.19  164.65  170.14  173.30 
14  159  162.84  11.31  2.7130  162.9969  0.0615  144.81  149.16  155.97  163.00  169.54  175.07  178.25 
15  141  165.89  9.51  2.6255  166.2806  0.0599  148.36  152.62  159.33  166.28  172.79  178.33  181.51 
16  128  168.61  9.13  2.4396  168.2967  0.0581  150.95  155.02  161.51  168.30  174.71  180.21  183.39 
17  139  168.42  9.82  2.2561  169.4808  0.0563  152.76  156.65  162.89  169.48  175.77  181.20  184.35 
    Female (height, cm)
Age (years)  Average  SD  P5  P10  P25  P50  P75  P90  P95 
21  123.71  8.06  −0.3361  123.2524  0.0685  110.34  113.03  117.73  123.25  129.13  134.75  138.26 
44  129.09  9.18  0.0159  129.0198  0.0656  115.82  118.61  123.44  129.02  134.85  140.32  143.70 
47  135.33  9.54  0.3377  134.8608  0.0626  121.45  124.33  129.25  134.86  140.63  145.96  149.22 
10  63  140.19  8.07  0.5617  140.6397  0.0596  127.15  130.08  135.04  140.64  146.34  151.56  154.72 
11  69  146.72  7.41  0.6872  146.2879  0.0570  132.77  135.72  140.70  146.29  151.95  157.10  160.21 
12  82  151.05  8.43  0.7742  150.8989  0.0551  137.37  140.33  145.32  150.90  156.53  161.63  164.71 
13  72  154.50  8.31  0.9372  154.0020  0.0536  140.45  143.44  148.44  154.00  159.58  164.61  167.63 
14  91  155.05  8.41  1.3177  155.8299  0.0526  142.16  145.22  150.27  155.83  161.32  166.22  169.12 
15  110  157.35  8.32  1.9529  157.2717  0.0517  143.31  146.50  151.69  157.27  162.67  167.38  170.14 
16  93  157.73  7.48  2.8349  157.7877  0.0510  143.36  146.78  152.17  157.79  163.06  167.55  170.13 
17  100  156.56  8.90  3.8636  157.5656  0.0507  142.49  146.22  151.90  157.57  162.71  166.96  169.37 

n, number of measurements; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2.

Average, standard deviation (SD), L, M, S, and smoothed weight percentiles in male and female children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities aged between 7 and 17 years.

    Male (weight, kg)
Age (years)  AverageSD  P5  P10  P25  P50  P75  P90  P95 
50  27.37  7.32−0.7294  26.0109  0.2675  17.76  19.15  21.96  26.01  31.56  38.59  44.22 
60  31.51  9.06−0.6711  29.5938  0.2786  19.85  21.49  24.79  29.59  36.18  44.51  51.17 
93  34.30  10.63−0.6054  33.4563  0.2888  22.04  23.96  27.83  33.46  41.16  50.87  58.57 
10  97  44.33  15.99−0.5223  37.6673  0.2966  24.39  26.63  31.14  37.67  46.53  57.54  66.14 
11  123  43.60  14.71−0.4210  41.4374  0.3004  26.45  29.00  34.12  41.44  51.21  63.06  72.10 
12  114  47.82  14.75−0.3160  45.5565  0.2999  28.81  31.70  37.45  45.56  56.15  68.62  77.88 
13  131  52.02  15.28−0.2185  50.2270  0.2959  31.63  34.89  41.31  50.23  61.60  74.62  84.03 
14  157  59.03  18.75−0.1304  54.9563  0.2894  34.63  38.26  45.32  54.96  66.97  80.37  89.83 
15  140  61.78  17.89−0.0517  58.9408  0.2803  37.37  41.29  48.83  58.94  71.27  84.70  93.99 
16  126  64.54  16.580.0210  62.0283  0.2699  39.71  43.83  51.69  62.03  74.39  87.55  96.50 
17  137  65.73  17.550.0907  64.5061  0.2593  41.75  46.03  54.08  64.51  76.73  89.49  98.03 
    Female (weight, kg)
Age (years)  AverageSD  P5  P10  P25  P50  P75  P90  P95 
21  27.89  9.02−0.0005  26.5873  0.2889  16.53  18.36  21.88  26.59  32.31  38.50  42.77 
44  32.09  9.87−0.0209  30.8410  0.2898  19.19  21.30  25.38  30.84  37.51  44.77  49.79 
46  38.34  12.44−0.0431  35.0336  0.2906  21.83  24.21  28.82  35.03  42.66  51.00  56.79 
10  63  39.05  10.51−0.0718  39.1857  0.2915  24.46  27.10  32.24  39.19  47.77  57.22  63.83 
11  69  46.17  13.14−0.1131  44.0374  0.2924  27.57  30.51  36.23  44.04  53.76  64.58  72.21 
12  82  51.70  14.75−0.1571  48.9117  0.2935  30.71  33.94  40.25  48.91  59.81  72.07  80.80 
13  72  55.99  17.23−0.1905  53.0114  0.2946  33.35  36.81  43.62  53.01  64.92  78.44  88.15 
14  91  57.95  16.91−0.2027  56.1197  0.2959  35.28  38.94  46.15  56.12  68.80  83.27  93.69 
15  110  63.08  20.44−0.1923  58.1749  0.2973  36.46  40.28  47.78  58.17  71.38  86.41  97.23 
16  92  61.87  18.71−0.1530  58.7676  0.2987  36.59  40.51  48.19  58.77  72.12  87.19  97.95 
17  100  60.91  20.01−0.0972  58.4191  0.3002  36.06  40.04  47.80  58.42  71.68  86.47  96.90 

n, number of measurements; SD, standard deviation.

Smoothed percentiles

The percentiles for height and weight (P5, P10, P25, P50, P75, P90 and P95) were developed for children and adolescents of both sexes, aged between 7 and 17 years (Figure 1A – D; Tables 1 and 2), with satisfactory LMS modeling based on Q tests (Q statistic between −2 and +2) (Supplementary Fig. 2A – 2D) and worm plots (free from linear trend) (Supplementary Fig. 3A – 3D).

Figure 1.

Percentiles (5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 95) for height (panels A and B) and weight (panels C and D) in children and adolescents with intellectual disability by sex between ages 7 and 17 years old.

(0.61MB).

Boys with ID showed a linear trend in height up to 11 or 12 years old, followed by an increment from 13 to 15 years old and deceleration from 15 or 16 years old. Girls with ID showed a linear trend in height between 7 and 11 years old and a deceleration from the age of 12 years. Furthermore, girls with ID did not show substantial changes in height from 15 to 17 years of age.

Regarding weight, the percentiles developed in this study indicated that girls showed a linear tendency to gain weight up to 13 years of age, followed by a deceleration at 14 or 15 years of age and stabilization after 15 years of age, while boys showed a linear trend of weight gain from 7 to 17 years old.

Discussion

This study developed smoothed height-to-age and weight-to-age percentiles, specifically for Brazilian children and adolescents with ID, aged between 7 and 17 years. The creation of percentiles has important implications for monitoring growth in the population with ID.

In this study, the height percentiles of boys with ID were linear until the age of 11 or 12, followed by an increment from the ages of 13 to 15 and a deceleration from the age of 15 or 16. Girls with ID showed a linear trend in height between the ages of 7 and 11 years. The data from this study are consistent with previous studies, indicating a linear trajectory of similar height between the sexes at ages below 11 years and substantially different after 12 years.25 Furthermore, girls with ID did not show substantial gains in height between the ages of 15 and 17. The results of growth rates during adolescence are in line with previous studies.25 The accelerated growth phase during puberty occurs two years earlier in girls compared to boys. From the age of 16, girls show minimal changes in height, while boys continue to grow substantially for another two or three years.25

Regarding weight, girls showed a linear weight trend until the age of 13, deceleration at the age of 14 or 15 and stabilization after the age of 15. However, boys showed a linear tendency to gain weight from 7 to 17 years of age. The findings of the present study are partially in agreement with findings about the population of children and adolescents without ID. Specifically, the present findings agree with those of Malina et al.,25 indicating linearity of weight in both sexes, from 7 to 12 or 13 years old, linearity up to 17 years old, in boys, and deceleration from 13 years old, in girls. However, Malina et al. data showed that girls continue to gain weight from the age of 15, while the girls with ID did not show weight gains from the age of 15.25

The development of percentiles can be useful in clinical practice, as is the case for subpopulations with ID. For example, previous studies developed height and weight percentiles for young people with Down,11,21 Williams,13 Rett,14 Rubinstein-Taybi,15 Prader-Willi,16 Wolf-Hirschhorn26 and Ellis–van Creveld27 syndromes, recommended by health agencies such as the CDC.21 The percentiles are a reference for health professionals to verify if there are deviations in weight or height or both between one appointment and the next and then they can establish a hypothesis to be evaluated. For example: if the patient changes to a higher percentile for weight and height, it could just be excess weight; if the patient changes to a higher percentile for weight and lower percentile for height, it could be hypothyroidism or Cushing disease.

However, evidence indicates that young people with ID associated with genetic conditions are shorter in height compared to young people with ID in the general population,10 which is a limitation for the clinical use of existing charts.

The present study is the first to develop growth references for height for people with ID not associated with genetic conditions. However, further studies are needed to confirm the multiethnic, age and sex variabilities in children with ID.

Sex and age are important determinants of health in the general population, but their effects on height are not entirely known. In young people with ID, research shows conflicting results regarding general health and lifestyle among boys and girls,6,28-30 limiting possible explanations for sex differences in height and weight in this population.

The present study has limitations. First, data was obtained retrospectively from clinical records. However, the data was obtained by trained professionals using standardized protocols. Furthermore, the data was rigorously subjected to cleaning processes. Secondly, the samples consisted of children and adolescents aged between 7 and 17 years, limiting the identification of critical age windows of growth, especially before 7 years of age. Thirdly, the sample size was relatively small in girls aged 7 to 9 years. However, diagnostic models used in the present study (i.e., Q statistics) considered sampling weights and presented a normal distribution, regardless of age. Lastly, although this study is the first to develop height and weight percentiles, its application in clinical practice should be examined in future studies.

This study developed height and weight percentiles with satisfactory modeling in boys and girls with ID, aged between 7 and 17 years. More research is needed to investigate possible changes in growth and variability with sex and age in children and adolescents with ID.

Funding sources

The study was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grants: 2017/13071-4; 2019/07103-6) and the São Paulo State Federation of APAES (FEAPAES-SP).

References
[1]
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Defining criteria for intellectual disability.
Aaidd.org. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, (2019),
[2]
P.K. Maulik, M.N. Mascarenhas, C.D. Mathers, T. Dua, S. Saxena.
Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies.
Res Dev Disab, 32 (2011), pp. 419-436
[3]
Brazil, Ministry of Health. Secretariat of Specialized Health Care. Secretariat of Science, Technology and strategic inputs in health. protocol for the etiological diagnosis of intellectual disability. Ministry of Health, 2020.
[4]
S.M. Karam, M. Riegel, S.L. Segal, T.M. Félix, A.J.D. Barros, I.S. Santos, et al.
Genetic causes of intellectual disability in a birth cohort: a population-based study.
Am J Med Genet Part A, 167 (2015), pp. 1204-1214
[5]
K.L. Phillips, L.A. Schieve, S. Visser, S. Boulet, A.J. Sharma, M.D. Kogan, et al.
Prevalence and impact of unhealthy weight in a national sample of us adolescents with autism and other learning and behavioral disabilities.
Mat Child Health J, 18 (2014), pp. 1964-1975
[6]
S. Reppermund, P. Srasuebkul, K. Dean, J.N Trollor.
Factors associated with death in people with intellectual disability.
J Appl Res Intel Disab, 33 (2019), pp. 420-429
[7]
L.A. Allerton, V. Welch, E Emerson.
Health inequalities experienced by children and young people with intellectual disabilities.
J Intel Disab, 15 (2011), pp. 269-278
[8]
M.J. Bull.
Health Supervision for children with Down syndrome.
Pediatrics, 128 (2011), pp. 393-406
[9]
N. Abdullah, P. Drummond, N. Gray, O. Al-Khalidi, R. Barry, T. Cheetham.
Short stature: increased in children with severe learning disability.
Child: Care Health Dev, 35 (2009), pp. 266-270
[10]
H. Katoda.
Height and weight of Tokyo schoolchildren with and without intellectual handicaps.
Ann Hum Biol, 18 (1991), pp. 327-339
[11]
F. Bertapelli, S. Agiovlasitis, M.R. Machado, R. do Val Roso, G. Guerra-Junior.
Growth charts for Brazilian children with Down syndrome: birth to 20 years of age.
J Epidemiol, 27 (2017), pp. 263-265
[12]
R.J. Nogueira, L.F. Zimmerman, Y.M. Moreno, C.R. Comparini, D.V. Viana, T.A. Vieira, et al.
Anthropometric and body-mass composition suggests an intrinsic feature in Williams-Beuren syndrome.
Rev Assoc Med Bras, 57 (2011), pp. 681-685
[13]
A.S. Strafacci, F. Bertapelli, C.A. Kim, M.J. Rivadeneira, R.S. Honjo, L.D. Kulikowski, et al.
Brazilian growth charts for Williams-Beuren syndrome at ages 2 to 18 years.
J Pediatr (Rio J), 100 (2024), pp. 277-282
[14]
D.C. Tarquinio, M.C. Jones, K.L. Jones, L.M. Bird.
Growth charts for 22q11 deletion syndrome.
Am J Med Genet Part A, 158A (2012), pp. 2672-2681
[15]
C.A. Stevens, R.C. Hennekam, B.L. Blackburn.
Growth in the Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.
Am J Med Genet, 37 (2005), pp. S51-S55
[16]
M.G. Butler, J. Sturich, J. Lee, S.E. Myers, B.Y. Whitman, J.A. Gold, et al.
Growth standards of infants with Prader-Willi Syndrome.
Pediatrics, 127 (2011), pp. 687-695
[17]
M. de Onis, F. Branca.
Childhood stunting: a global perspective.
Mat Child Nutr, 12 (2016), pp. 12-26
[18]
C. Garza, M. de Onis.
Rationale for developing a new international growth reference.
Food Nutr Bull, 25 (2004), pp. S5-13
[19]
M. de Onis.
Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents.
Bull WHO, 85 (2007), pp. 660-667
[20]
R.J. Kuczmarski, C.L. Ogden, S.S. Guo, L.M. Grummer-Strawn, K.M. Flegal, Z. Mei, et al.
2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development.
Vital Health Stat 11, 246 (2002), pp. 1-190
[21]
B.S. Zemel, M. Pipan, V.A. Stallings, W. Hall, K. Schadt, D.S. Freedman, et al.
Growth charts for children with Down syndrome in the United States.
Pediatrics, 136 (2015), pp. e1204-e1211
[22]
T.J. Cole, P.J. Green.
Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood.
Stat Med, 11 (1992), pp. 1305-1319
[23]
H. Pan, T. Cole.
User's Guide to LMSchartmaker.
Medical Research Council, (1997),
[24]
S.van Buuren, M Fredriks.
Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves.
Stat Med, 20 (2001), pp. 1259-1277
[25]
M. Malina Robert, C. Bouchard, Oded Bar-Or.
Growth, maturation, and physical activity.
Human Kinetics Cop, (2004),
[26]
T. Antonius, J. Draaisma, E. Levtchenko, N. Knoers, W. Renier, C. van Ravenswaaij.
Growth charts for Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (0–4 years of age).
Eur J Pediatr, 167 (2007), pp. 807-810
[27]
S. Verbeek, P.H. Eilers, K. Lawrence, R.C. Hennekam, F.G. Versteegh.
Growth charts for children with Ellis–van Creveld syndrome.
Eur J Pediatr, 170 (2010), pp. 207-211
[28]
M. Skrzypek, W. Koch, K. Goral, K. Soczyńska, O. Poźniak, K. Cichoń, et al.
Analysis of the diet quality and nutritional state of children, youth and young adults with an intellectual disability: a multiple case study. Preliminary Polish results.
Nutrients, 13 (2021), pp. 3058
[29]
N. Buckley, E.J. Glasson, W. Chen, A. Epstein, H. Leonard, R. Skoss, et al.
Prevalence estimates of mental health problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Austr New Zeal J Psychiatry, 54 (2020), pp. 970-984
[30]
S.L. Einfeld, L.A. Ellis, E Emerson.
Comorbidity of intellectual disability and mental disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review.
J Intel Dev Disab, 36 (2011), pp. 137-143
Download PDF
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate jped2@sbp.com.br. Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact jped2@sbp.com.br.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.