Journal Information
Vol. 89. Issue 2.
Pages 171-178 (March - April 2013)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 89. Issue 2.
Pages 171-178 (March - April 2013)
Original Article
Open Access
A critical comparison between the World Health Organization list of essential medicines for children and the Brazilian list of essential medicines (Rename)
Visits
5020
Helena Lutéscia L. Coelhoa,
Corresponding author
helenalutescia@yahoo.com.br

Corresponding author.
, Luís Carlos Reyb, Marina S.G. de Medeirosc, Ronaldo A. Barbosad, Said G. da Cruz Fonsecae, Patricia Q. da Costaf
a PhD in Pharmacology, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
b PhD in Pediatrics, Departamento de Saúde Materno-Infantil, UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
c Pharmacist. MSc Candidate in Pharmaceutical Sciences, UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
d Pharmacist, UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
e MSc in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento e Inovação Tecnológica em Medicamentos, UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
f PhD in Public Health. Professor, Centro Universitário Estácio – Faculdades Integradas do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Objective

To perform a critical comparison between the Brazilian national essential medicines list (Rename, 2012) with the list of essential medicines for children (LEMC, 2011) of the World Health Organization (WHO), regarding the differences among drugs and formulations listed for children.

Methods

The LEMC drugs were classified into four categories: 1) absent in Rename; 2) included in Rename but without any formulation suitable for children; 3) listed in Rename only in some formulations; 4) present in Rename in all formulations. The missing formulations were analyzed by therapeutic group. Alternatives present in Rename were searched.

Results

From the 261 drugs of interest on the LEMC, 30.3% are absent from Rename, 11.1% are in Rename but without any pediatric formulation, and 32.2% are present in some but not all formulations listed in LEMC. Considering all formulations items listed in the LEMC (n = 577), 349 are missing from Rename, of these 19.6% due to their strength, and 18.5% due to the the dosage form. Useful formulations specific for neonatal care, respiratory tract, central nervous system, and anti-infectives, among other groups, are missing.

Conclusion

The lack of age-appropriate formulations of essential medicines for children in Brazil includes important therapeutic groups and indispensable drugs for severe clinical conditions. Some of these products exist in the Brazilian pharmaceutical market, but not in public facilities; others could be produced by national laboratories with commercial interest or stimulated by a specific governmental policy, as in other countries.

Keywords:
Newborn
Infant
Child
Pharmaceutical preparations
Health public policy
Drugs
essential
Resumo
Objetivo

Realizar uma comparação crítica entre a Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais (Rename, 2012) e a Lista de Medicamentos Essenciais para Crianças (LMEC, 2011) da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS), com relação às diferenças entre os medi- camentos e as formulações listadas para crianças.

Métodos

Os medicamentos da LMEC foram classificados em quatro grupos: 1) não cons- tam na Rename; 2) constam na Rename, porém sem qualquer formulação adequada para crianças; 3) listados na Rename apenas com algumas formulações; 4) constam na Rename em todas as formulações. As formulações que faltam foram analisadas por grupos tera- pêuticos. As alternativas presentes na Rename foram pesquisadas.

Resultados

Dos 261 medicamentos de interesse listados na LMEC, 30,3% não estão pre- sentes na Rename, 11,1% estão na Rename, mas sem qualquer formulação pediátrica, e 32,3% estão presentes em algumas, mas não todas as formulações listadas na LMEC. Considerando todos os itens de formulações listados na LMEC (n = 577), 349 não constam na Rename, desses, 19,6% devido à intensidade de dosagem, e 18,5% devido à forma farmacêutica. Faltam formulações úteis específicas para cuidado neonatal, trato respi- ratório e sistema nervoso central, anti-infecciosos, entre outros grupos.

Conclusão

A ausência de formulações adequadas à idade de medicamentos essenciais para crianças no Brasil inclui importantes grupos terapêuticos e medicamentos indispen- sáveis para quadros clínicos graves. Alguns desses produtos são encontrados no mercado farmacêutico brasileiro, porém não existem em unidades públicas; outros poderiam ser produzidos por laboratórios nacionais com interesse comercial ou estimulados por uma política governamental específica, como é feito em outros países.

Palavras-chave:
Recém-nascido
Neonato
Criança
Preparações farmacêuticas
Política de saúde pública
Medicamentos essenciais
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Reference
[1]
World Health Organization (WHO). Medicines: essential medicines. Fact sheet n.° 325. Geneve: WHO; 2010 [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs325/en/index.html.
[2]
T. Nunn, J. Williams.
Formulation of medicines for children.
Br J Clin Pharmacol., 59 (2005), pp. 674-676
[3]
A. Cram, J. Breitkreutz, S. Desset-Brèthes, T. Nunn, C. Tuleu.
European Paediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI). Challenges of developing palatable oral paediatric formulations.
Int J Pharm., 365 (2009), pp. 1-3
[4]
V.N. Yewale, D. Dharmapalan.
Promoting appropriate use of drugs in children.
Int J Pediatr., 2012 (2012), pp. 906570
[5]
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO policy perspectives on medicines: the selection of essential medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2002 [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://apps.who. int/medicinedocs/pdf/s2296e/s2296e.pdf.
[6]
European Medicines Agency. Report from the Paediatric Committee on its first anniversary. London: European Medicines Agency; 2008 [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/pdco/34788408en.pdf.
[7]
T. Nunn.
The National Institute for Health Research Medicines for Children Research Network.
Paediatr Drugs., 11 (2009), pp. 14-15
[8]
C.P. Milne, J.B. Bruss.
The economics of pediatric formulation development for off-patent drugs.
Clin Ther., 30 (2008), pp. 2133-2145
[9]
Costello I, Long PF, Wog IC, Tuleu C, Yeung V, editores. Paediatric drug handling. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2007.
[10]
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Políticas de Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Política nacional de medicamentos. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2001.(Série C. Projetos, Programas e Relatórios, n.° 25).
[11]
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica e Insumos Estratégicos. Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais: Rename. 6th ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008. (Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde).
[12]
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica e Insumos Estratégicos. Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais: Rename. 7th ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010.(Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde).
[13]
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica e Insumos Estratégicos. Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais: Rename. 8th ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. (Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde).
[14]
P.Q. Costa, J.E. Lima, H.L. Coelho.
Prescription and preparation of drugs without adequate formulation for children: a hospital- based study.
Braz J Pharm Sci., 45 (2009), pp. 57-66
[15]
P.Q. Costa, L.C. Rey, H.L. Coelho.
Lack of drug preparations for use in children in Brazil.
J Pediatr (Rio J)., 85 (2009), pp. 229-235
[16]
D.B. Santos, A. Clavenna, M. Bonati, H.L. Coelho.
Off-label and unlicensed drug utilization in hospitalized children in Fortaleza, Brazil.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol., 64 (2008), pp. 1111-1118
[17]
D.B. Santos, A.A. Cruz, S. de Magalhães Simões, L.C. Rodrigues, P.A. Camargos, H.L. Coelho, et al.
Pattern of asthma medication use among children from a large urban center in Brazil.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol., 68 (2012), pp. 73-82
[18]
P.R. Carvalho, C.G. Carvalho, P.T. Alievi, J. Martinbiancho, E.A. Trotta.
Identificação de medicamentos “não apropriados para crianças” em prescrições de unidade de tratamento intensivo pediátrica.
J Pediatr (Rio J)., 79 (2003), pp. 397-402
[19]
M.A. Peterlini, M.N. Chaud, Pedreira M.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem., 11 (2003), pp. 88-95
[20]
A.C. Gonçalves, C.M. Caixeta, A.M. Reis.
Analysis of the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs in children and teenagers in two teaching hospitals.
Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl., 30 (2009), pp. 177-182
[21]
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO model list of essential medicines for children - 3rd list. Geneva: WHO; 2011 [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2011/a95054_eng.pdf.
[22]
Regulations requiring manufacturers to assess the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and biological products in pediatric patients – FDA. Final rule. Fed Regist. 1998;63:66631-72.
[23]
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatric Pharmacology Research Units Network [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/ppru1.cfm.
[24]
Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, Pub. L . No. 105-15, 111 Stat. 2296 (November 21, 1997) [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: h ttp://www.fda.gov/Regulatory I n f o r m a t i o n/L e g i s l a t i o n/F e d e r a l F o o d D r u g a n d CosmeticActFDCAct/SignificantAmendmentstotheFDCAct/FDAMA/FullTextofFDAMAlaw/default.htm.
[25]
M.L. Buck.
The FDA Modernization Act of 1997: impact on. pediatric medicine.
Pediatr Pharm., (2000), pp. 6
[26]
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, Pub. L. No. 107-9, Stat. [1789] (January 4, 2002) [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Development ApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/UCM049874.pdf.
[27]
A. Zajicek.
The National Institutes of Health and the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.
Paediatr Drugs., 11 (2009), pp. 45-47
[28]
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-85, 121 Stat. 823 (September 27, 2007) [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cg i-bin/g etdo c.cg i?dbname=110_co ng _publ ic_ laws&docid=f:publ085.110.
[29]
Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group (PPAG) [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.ppag.org/en/art/348/.
[30]
G. Koren, M. Rieder, S.M. MacLeod.
The global alliance for pediatric pharmacology: the future is here and now.
Paediatr Drugs., 11 (2009), pp. 4-5
[31]
Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Official Journal of the European Union [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-1/reg_2006_1901/reg_2006_1901_ en.pdf.
[32]
European Medicines Agency. Paediatric Committee (PDCO) [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.emea. europa.eu/htms/general/contacts/PDCO/PDCO.html.
[33]
D. Duarte, H. Fonseca.
Better medicines in Paediatrics.
Acta Pediatr Port., 39 (2008), pp. 17-22
[34]
World Health Organization (WHO). Better medicines for children: report by the Secretariat. Sixtieth World Health Assembly. Geneve: WHO; 2007 [accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA60/A60_25-en.pdf.
[35]
M. Gazarian.
Delivering better medicines to children: need for better integration between the science, the policy, and the practice.
Paediatr Drugs., 11 (2009), pp. 41-44
[36]
Van Overmeire B, Smets K, Lecoutere D, Van de Broek H, Weyler J, Degroote K, et al. A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:674-81.
[37]
M.J. Sankar, R. Agarwal, A.K. Deorari, V.K. Paul.
Sepsis in the newborn.
Indian J Pediatr., 75 (2008), pp. 261-266
[38]
C. Pandolfini, M. Bonati.
A literature review on off-label drug use in children.
Eur J Pediatr., 164 (2005), pp. 552-558
[39]
R. Kaushal, D.W. Bates, C. Landrigan, K.J. McKenna, M.D. Clapp, F. Federico, et al.
Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.
JAMA., 285 (2001), pp. 2114-2120
[40]
G. Terrin, A. Passariello, M. De Curtis, F. Manguso, G. Salvia, L. Lega, et al.
Ranitidine is associated with infections, necrotizing enterocolitis, and fatal outcome in newborns.
Pediatrics., 129 (2012), pp. e40-e45
[41]
R.A. Pauwels, M.R. Sears, M. Campbell, C. Villasante, S. Huang, A. Lindh, et al.
Formoterol as relief medication in asthma: a worldwide safety and effectiveness trial.
Eur Respir J., 22 (2003), pp. 787-794
[42]
W.E. Berger.
The use of inhaled formoterol in the treatment of asthma.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol., 97 (2006), pp. 24-33
[43]
E. Schirm, H. Tobi, T.W. de Vries, I. Choonara, L.T. De Jong-van den Berg.
Lack of appropriate formulations of medicines for children in the community.
Acta Paediatr., 92 (2003), pp. 1486-1489
[44]
S.A. Beggs, N.E. Cranswick, M.D. Reed.
Improving drug use for children in the developing world.
Arch Dis Child., 90 (2005), pp. 1091-1093

Please, cite this article as: Coelho HL, Rey LC, de Medeiros MS, Barbosa RA, Fonseca SG, da Costa PQ. A critical comparison between the World Health Organization list of essential medicines for children and the Brazilian list of essential medicines (Rename). J Pediatr (Rio J). 2013;89:171−8.

Copyright © 2013. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
Download PDF
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate jped2@sbp.com.br. Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact jped2@sbp.com.br.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.