Journal Information
Vol. 75. Issue 01.
Pages 45-49 (January - February 1999)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 75. Issue 01.
Pages 45-49 (January - February 1999)
Full text access
Ultra-sonografia cerebral neonatal normal no prematuro - é possível tranqüilizar os pais?
Visits
1132
Rosane R. de Melloa, Maria Dalva B.B. Meiob, Denise S. Morschc, Kátia S. Silvad, Maria Virgínia P. Dutrae, Alexandra V. Monteirof, José Maria de Andrade Lopesg
a Mestre em Saúde da Criança / Departamento de Neonatologia do Instituto Fernandes Figueira.
b Mestranda em Saúde Coletiva / Departamento de Neonatologia do Instituto Fernandes Figueira.
c Mestre em Psicologia / Bolsista da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz.
d Mestre em Saúde Pública / Departamento de Pediatria do Instituto Fernandes Figueira.
e Mestre em Saúde Coletiva / Departamento de Pediatria do Instituto Fernandes Figueira.
f Doutora em Radiologia / Serviço de Radiologia do Instituto Fernandes Figueira.
g Chefe do Departamento de Neonatologia do Instituto Fernandes Figueira. Membro do Comitê de Perinatologia da SBP.
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of neonatal cerebral ultrasonography for motor and cognitive development of very low birth weight preterm babies after twelve months corrected age. Methods

We studied a cohort of preterm babies with birth weight less than 1500g admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Instituto Fernandes Figueira, and followed up to 12-30 months corrected age for prematurity. A cerebral ultrasonography was performed before discharge. The results were classified as normal and abnormal (parenchymal hemorrhage, porencephaly, periventricular leucomalacia, ventricular dilatation). The babies were followed up at the Outpatient Follow-up Clinic and, between 12-30 months corrected age, underwent neurological assessment, observation of the acquisition of motor milestones, and assessment according to the Bayley Scales of Development. Results: We studied 83 babies. Cerebral ultrasonography was normal in 68 babies (81.9%) and abnormal in 15 (18.8%). At a mean age of 21 months, 63 children (75.9%) had normal motor development and 20 (24.0%) had motor abnormalities. The cognitive development was normal in 68 children (81.9%). The negative predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 85.3%, and for cognitive development, 86.8%. The positive predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 66.7%, and for cognitive development, 42.9%. Conclusions: The negative predictive values were greater than the positive predictive values in both areas of development. The probability that children with normal neonatal ultrasonography have normal motor and cognitive development is greater than 85%.

To evaluate the predictive value of neonatal cerebral ultrasonography for motor and cognitive development of very low birth weight preterm babies after twelve months corrected age. Methods

We studied a cohort of preterm babies with birth weight less than 1500g admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Instituto Fernandes Figueira, and followed up to 12-30 months corrected age for prematurity. A cerebral ultrasonography was performed before discharge. The results were classified as normal and abnormal (parenchymal hemorrhage, porencephaly, periventricular leucomalacia, ventricular dilatation). The babies were followed up at the Outpatient Follow-up Clinic and, between 12-30 months corrected age, underwent neurological assessment, observation of the acquisition of motor milestones, and assessment according to the Bayley Scales of Development. Results: We studied 83 babies. Cerebral ultrasonography was normal in 68 babies (81.9%) and abnormal in 15 (18.8%). At a mean age of 21 months, 63 children (75.9%) had normal motor development and 20 (24.0%) had motor abnormalities. The cognitive development was normal in 68 children (81.9%). The negative predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 85.3%, and for cognitive development, 86.8%. The positive predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 66.7%, and for cognitive development, 42.9%. Conclusions: The negative predictive values were greater than the positive predictive values in both areas of development. The probability that children with normal neonatal ultrasonography have normal motor and cognitive development is greater than 85%.

Methods

We studied a cohort of preterm babies with birth weight less than 1500g admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Instituto Fernandes Figueira, and followed up to 12-30 months corrected age for prematurity. A cerebral ultrasonography was performed before discharge. The results were classified as normal and abnormal (parenchymal hemorrhage, porencephaly, periventricular leucomalacia, ventricular dilatation). The babies were followed up at the Outpatient Follow-up Clinic and, between 12-30 months corrected age, underwent neurological assessment, observation of the acquisition of motor milestones, and assessment according to the Bayley Scales of Development. Results: We studied 83 babies. Cerebral ultrasonography was normal in 68 babies (81.9%) and abnormal in 15 (18.8%). At a mean age of 21 months, 63 children (75.9%) had normal motor development and 20 (24.0%) had motor abnormalities. The cognitive development was normal in 68 children (81.9%). The negative predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 85.3%, and for cognitive development, 86.8%. The positive predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 66.7%, and for cognitive development, 42.9%. Conclusions: The negative predictive values were greater than the positive predictive values in both areas of development. The probability that children with normal neonatal ultrasonography have normal motor and cognitive development is greater than 85%.

Results

We studied 83 babies. Cerebral ultrasonography was normal in 68 babies (81.9%) and abnormal in 15 (18.8%). At a mean age of 21 months, 63 children (75.9%) had normal motor development and 20 (24.0%) had motor abnormalities. The cognitive development was normal in 68 children (81.9%). The negative predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 85.3%, and for cognitive development, 86.8%. The positive predictive value of the cerebral ultrasonography for motor development was 66.7%, and for cognitive development, 42.9%. Conclusions: The negative predictive values were greater than the positive predictive values in both areas of development. The probability that children with normal neonatal ultrasonography have normal motor and cognitive development is greater than 85%.

Conclusions

The negative predictive values were greater than the positive predictive values in both areas of development. The probability that children with normal neonatal ultrasonography have normal motor and cognitive development is greater than 85%.

Resumen
Objetivo

Verificar os valores preditivos da ultra-sonografia cerebral neonatal em relação ao desenvolvimento motor e cognitivo de prematuros de muito baixo peso após os 12 meses de idade corrigida.

Métodos

A população foi constituída de uma coorte de prematuros com peso de nascimento inferior a 1.500g, oriundos da UTI Neonatal do Instituto Fernandes Figueira, acompanhados até completarem 12 a 30 meses de idade corrigida para a prematuridade. Próximo à alta hospitalar, realizou-se a ultra-sonografia cerebral. Os resultados foram classificados em normal e anormal (hemorragia parenquimatosa, porencefalia, leucomalácia, dilatação ventricular). Os bebês foram acompanhados no Ambulatório de Seguimento e, entre 12 e 30 meses de idade corrigida, foram submetidos à avaliação neurológica, observação da aquisição dos marcos motores do desenvolvimento e aplicação da Escala de Bayley de desenvolvimento.

Resultados

A população em estudo foi constituída de 83 crianças. Os exames ultra-sonográficos foram normais em 68 bebês (81,9%) e anormais em 15 (18,0%). Com idade média de 21 meses, 63 crianças (75,9%) apresentaram desenvolvimento motor normal e 20 (24,0%), alterações motoras. O desenvolvimento cognitivo foi normal em 68 crianças (81,9%). O valor preditivo negativo da ultra-sonografia em relação ao desenvolvimento motor foi de 85,3% e em relação ao desenvolvimento cognitivo, 86,8%. O valor preditivo positivo da ultra-sonografia cerebral em relação ao desenvolvimento motor foi de 66,7% e ao cognitivo,42,9%.

Conclusões

Os valores preditivos negativos foram superiores aos positivos nas duas áreas do desenvolvimento. Diante de um resultado ultra-sonográfico normal, a probabilidade de a criança ter desenvolvimento motor e cognitivo normais é superior a 85%.

Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
Article options
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 10 de fevereiro de 2025, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Effective February 10, 2025, all articles submitted will be subject to an Article Publishing Charge (APC) after peer review and acceptance. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.