Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 75. Núm. 02.
Páginas 97-104 (março - abril 1999)
Compartilhar
Compartilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 75. Núm. 02.
Páginas 97-104 (março - abril 1999)
Acesso de texto completo
Diarréia aguda em crianças menores de 3 anos de idade: recuperação de enteropatógenos nas amostras fecais de pacientes comparada à de grupo controle
Visitas
1129
Mauro Sérgio Toporovskia, Igor M. Mimicab, Pedro Paulo Chieffic, Maria Aparecida Paschoalottid, Angela M. G. Diase, Cely B. Silvaf
a Professor Doutor em Pediatria, assistente da disciplina de Gastroenterologia Pediátrica da FCM da Santa Casa de São Paulo.
b Professor Pleno da disciplina de Microbiologia do Departamento de Ciências Patológicas da FCM da Santa Casa de São Paulo.
c Professor Pleno da Disciplina de Parasitologia do Departamento de Ciências Patológicas da FCM da Santa Casa de São Paulo.
d Professora Instrutora da Disciplina de Parasitologia do Departamento de Ciências Patológicas da FCM da Santa Casa de São Paulo.
e Microbiologista do Setor de Bacteriologia do Instituto Adolfo Lutz - São Paulo.
f Técnica em Microbiologia do Serviço de Controle de Infecções da Santa Casa de São Paulo.
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Abstract
Objectives

To observe the occurrence of different etiological agents of acute diarrhea (AD) in stool specimens of patients and children in a control group. Material and Methods: We studied 100 children younger than 3 years with AD and 100 controls, from November 1993 to May 1994. We collected stool specimens from both groups and investigated the presence of the following enteropathogens: Rotavirus, Escherichia coli (EPEC, ETEC, EIEC, EHEC), Salmonella sp, Shigella sp, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Ÿersinia enterocolitica, Cryptosporidium sp, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica. Statistical analysis was performed with the exact Fisher test (at significance level P<0.05). The mean age was 12.5 months, with more cases in patients younger than 6 months (35%). Children were seen at the emergency room on an average fifth day after the start of diarrhea. Most came from homes with basic sanitary conditions. Watery diarrhea was more frequent than bloody diarrhea with mucus, at a rate of 4:1. Results: Rotavirus was the most frequent agent: 21% in the AD group and 3% in the control group (P=0.0001). Shigella sp was isolated in 7% of the AD group and in none of the control group (P=0.0140). EPEC was detected in 13% of AD cases and 7% in the control group (P=0.2381) but the classical subgroups O55, O111, O119 were only isolated from the patients with AD. The other enteropathogens were rarely detected, or detected at the same rate in both groups. Rotavirus and EPEC were the most frequently isolated agents in watery diarrhea, while Shigella sp was the predominant agent found in bloody stools with mucus. Conclusions: Rotavirus was the most common causative agent in AD. The detection of Rotavirus and Shigella sp nearly exclusively in patients with AD confirms the high pathogenicity of these etiological agents when compared with the others. Escherichia coli (EPEC) diagnosed by polyvalent sera did not confirm its respective diarrheogenic property, since it was isolated at the same rate in both patients with AD and controls. Monovalent antisera detected classical subgroups of EPEC (O111, O119, O55) isolated only from AD patients, confirming the already-known high pathogenicity of these strains.

Material and Methods

We studied 100 children younger than 3 years with AD and 100 controls, from November 1993 to May 1994. We collected stool specimens from both groups and investigated the presence of the following enteropathogens: Rotavirus, Escherichia coli (EPEC, ETEC, EIEC, EHEC), Salmonella sp, Shigella sp, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Ÿersinia enterocolitica, Cryptosporidium sp, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica. Statistical analysis was performed with the exact Fisher test (at significance level P<0.05). The mean age was 12.5 months, with more cases in patients younger than 6 months (35%). Children were seen at the emergency room on an average fifth day after the start of diarrhea. Most came from homes with basic sanitary conditions. Watery diarrhea was more frequent than bloody diarrhea with mucus, at a rate of 4:1. Results: Rotavirus was the most frequent agent: 21% in the AD group and 3% in the control group (P=0.0001). Shigella sp was isolated in 7% of the AD group and in none of the control group (P=0.0140). EPEC was detected in 13% of AD cases and 7% in the control group (P=0.2381) but the classical subgroups O55, O111, O119 were only isolated from the patients with AD. The other enteropathogens were rarely detected, or detected at the same rate in both groups. Rotavirus and EPEC were the most frequently isolated agents in watery diarrhea, while Shigella sp was the predominant agent found in bloody stools with mucus. Conclusions: Rotavirus was the most common causative agent in AD. The detection of Rotavirus and Shigella sp nearly exclusively in patients with AD confirms the high pathogenicity of these etiological agents when compared with the others. Escherichia coli (EPEC) diagnosed by polyvalent sera did not confirm its respective diarrheogenic property, since it was isolated at the same rate in both patients with AD and controls. Monovalent antisera detected classical subgroups of EPEC (O111, O119, O55) isolated only from AD patients, confirming the already-known high pathogenicity of these strains.

Results

Rotavirus was the most frequent agent: 21% in the AD group and 3% in the control group (P=0.0001). Shigella sp was isolated in 7% of the AD group and in none of the control group (P=0.0140). EPEC was detected in 13% of AD cases and 7% in the control group (P=0.2381) but the classical subgroups O55, O111, O119 were only isolated from the patients with AD. The other enteropathogens were rarely detected, or detected at the same rate in both groups. Rotavirus and EPEC were the most frequently isolated agents in watery diarrhea, while Shigella sp was the predominant agent found in bloody stools with mucus. Conclusions: Rotavirus was the most common causative agent in AD. The detection of Rotavirus and Shigella sp nearly exclusively in patients with AD confirms the high pathogenicity of these etiological agents when compared with the others. Escherichia coli (EPEC) diagnosed by polyvalent sera did not confirm its respective diarrheogenic property, since it was isolated at the same rate in both patients with AD and controls. Monovalent antisera detected classical subgroups of EPEC (O111, O119, O55) isolated only from AD patients, confirming the already-known high pathogenicity of these strains.

Conclusions

Rotavirus was the most common causative agent in AD. The detection of Rotavirus and Shigella sp nearly exclusively in patients with AD confirms the high pathogenicity of these etiological agents when compared with the others. Escherichia coli (EPEC) diagnosed by polyvalent sera did not confirm its respective diarrheogenic property, since it was isolated at the same rate in both patients with AD and controls. Monovalent antisera detected classical subgroups of EPEC (O111, O119, O55) isolated only from AD patients, confirming the already-known high pathogenicity of these strains.

Resumen
Objetivos

Observar a ocorrência dos diferentes agentes etiológicos de diarréia aguda (DA) comparando a excreção fecal dos mesmos em pacientes e crianças do grupo controle.

Material e métodos

Foram estudadas 100 crianças com DA e 100 controles menores de 3 anos de idade no período de novembro de 93 a maio de 94. Foram colhidas amostras de fezes em ambos os grupos, pesquisando-se os seguintes enteropatógenos: Rotavirus, Escherichia coli (EPEC, ETEC, EIEC, EHEC), Salmonella sp, Shigella sp, Campylobacter jejuni, C.coli, Ÿersinia enterocolitica, Cryptosporidium sp, Giardia lamblia e Entamoeba histolytica. A análise estatística foi realizada pelo Teste exato de Fisher (nível de significância p<0,05). A idade média foi de 12,5 meses, com maior prevalência de DA nos menores de seis meses(35%). As crianças foram atendidas em Pronto Socorro no quinto dia, em média, após o início do evento diarréico. Procediam em sua maioria de residências dotadas de saneamento básico. Predominou diarréia aquosa sobre mucossanguinolenta na razão de 4:1.

Resultados

O Rotavirus foi o agente mais detectado, 21% no grupo com diarréia e 3% nos controles (p = 0,0001). A Shigela sp foi isolada em 7% no grupo com diarréia e em nenhum caso nos controles (p = 0,0140). A Escherichia coli enteropatogênica (EPEC) foi detectada em 13% dos casos de DA e em 7% nos controles (p = 0,2381), porém os sorogrupos clássicos O55,0111,0119 foram isolados apenas nos portadores de diarréia. Os demais enteropatógenos não atingiram freqüências elevadas, ou foram detectados na mesma proporção em ambos os grupos. O Rotavirus e EPEC foram os agentes mais detectados nas diarréias aquosas, enquanto a Shigella sp foi o agente predominante nas diarréias mucossanguinolentas.

Conclusões

O Rotavirus foi o agente mais comum determinante de DA. A detecção de Rotavirus e Shigella sp quase exclusivamente em pacientes com DA confirmam a maior patogenicidade desses agentes etiológicos, em relação aos demais pesquisados. A pesquisa de Escherichia coli enteropatogênica (EPEC) por soros polivalentes não confirma o respectivo potencial diarreiogênico, por ser isoladada em proporção não significativamente superior nos pacientes com DA. A utilização dos antisoros monovalentes possibilitou a detecção dos clássicos sorogrupos de EPEC (O111, O119, O55) exclusivamente nas amostras de pacientes com DA, confirmando a característica patogenicidade das mesmas.

O texto completo está disponível em PDF
Baixar PDF
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate jped2@sbp.com.br. Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact jped2@sbp.com.br.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.