Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 94. Num. 2.March - April 2018
Pages 101-220
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
398
Vol. 94. Num. 2.March - April 2018
Pages 101-220
Review article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.06.013
Factors associated with breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or more: a systematic review
Fatores associados à manutenção da amamentação por 12 meses ou mais: revisão sistemática
Visits
398
Géssica S. Santanaa,
Corresponding author
gessicassantana@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Elsa Regina J. Giuglianib, Tatiana de O. Vieiraa, Graciete O. Vieiraa
a Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil
b Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
This item has received
398
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Main characteristics of the selected studies for a systematic review of factors associated with maintenance of breastfeeding for ≥ 12 months in descending order of year of publication.
Abstract
Objective

Synthesize the information about the factors associated with maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more.

Data source

A systematic review was conducted in the Pubmed/Medline, Scielo, and Lilacs databases, including articles published in Portuguese or English since 2004 on the factors associated with breastfeeding maintenance for at least 12 months; review articles and those with qualitative design were excluded. The factors were organized into four levels, according to the chronological proximity to the outcome: distal, distal intermediate, proximal intermediate, and proximal; nationality and place/area of residence were considered contextual factors.

Summary of data

1174 articles were identified, of which 19 were included in this review, comprising seven cohort studies and 12 cross-sectional studies. A total of 39 of the 75 assessed factors were associated with the outcome at least once. The factors with the highest percentages of associations with maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more, considering the number of times they were tested were: children whose parents are the caregivers (100%), none type of maternal exposure to smoke (54%), children and/or parents are immigrants/foreigners (50%), live in urban areas (42.9%), older maternal age (40%), married women (37.5%), higher level of maternal education (31.3%), greater parity (30.8%), and lower income (30%).

Conclusions

The maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more is associated with multiple factors, emphasizing the contextual factors and those related to some maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Associations differ in effect and magnitude between the different populations studied.

Keywords:
Review
Breast feeding
Epidemiologic factors
Resumo
Objetivo

Sintetizar as informações sobre os fatores associados à manutenção da amamentação por 12 meses ou mais.

Fontes de dados

Foi conduzida revisão sistemática nas bases de dados Pubmed/Medline, Scielo e Lilacs, incluindo artigos publicados em língua portuguesa ou inglesa desde 2004 versando sobre fatores associados à amamentação por, no mínimo, 12 meses. Excluíram-se artigos de revisão e com delineamento qualitativo. Os fatores foram organizados em quatro níveis de acordo com a proximidade cronológica com o desfecho: distal, intermediário distal, intermediário proximal e proximal; nacionalidade e local/área de residência foram considerados fatores contextuais.

Síntese dos dados

Identificaram-se 1.174 artigos, dos quais 19 foram selecionados para revisão, sendo sete estudos de coorte e 12 transversais. Dos 75 fatores explorados, 39 mostraram-se associados ao desfecho ao menos uma vez. Os fatores com os maiores percentuais de associações com a manutenção da amamentação por 12 meses ou mais, considerando o número de vezes que foram testados, foram: filhos terem os pais como cuidadores (100%), nenhum tipo de exposição materna ao fumo (54%), crianças e/ou pais serem imigrantes/estrangeiros (50%), morar em zona urbana (42,9%), maior idade materna (40%), mãe ser casada (37,5%), maior escolaridade materna (31,3%), maior número de filhos (30,8%) e menor renda familiar (30%).

Conclusões

A manutenção da amamentação por 12 meses ou mais está associada a múltiplos fatores, com destaque para os fatores contextuais e os relacionados a algumas características sociodemográficas das mães. As associações diferem em efeito e magnitude entre as diferentes populações estudadas.

Palavras-chave:
Revisão
Aleitamento materno
Fatores epidemiológicos
Full Text
Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the maintenance of breastfeeding (BF) for 2 years or more,1 based on the positive impact of breastfeeding on the health of the child and the breastfeeding mother, as well as the economic impact.2,3 Scientific evidence demonstrates the dose–response effect of breastfeeding, especially against morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases4,5 and overweight/obesity,6–9 favoring orofacial development10,11 and the intelligence quotient.3,12–14

Despite the WHO recommendation, the maintenance of breastfeeding after the first year of the child's life is practiced by few women, being more common in low-income countries, where the prevalence of BF at 12 months and 24 months is higher than 90% and 60%, respectively.4 In most high-income populations, this prevalence is below 20%, with important differences between countries, such as Norway (38%), the United States (27%), Sweden (16%), and the United Kingdom (¿1%).4 In Brazil, despite the significant advances in BF indicators, since the 1980s, less than half of the children aged between 12 and 14 months and approximately one-third of those aged 21–23 months are breastfed.15,16

Early weaning determinants have been widely assessed.17–19 However, little is known about factors associated with continued breastfeeding after 12 months. A Brazilian study found that, unlike what is reported for early weaning that the presence of the child's father in the home was a protective factor for BF,20,21 the cohabitation with the husband/partner was a risk factor for the maintenance of BF for 2 years or more.22 This discrepancy raises the suspicion that some factors involved in the maintenance of breastfeeding for a longer period differ from those associated with early weaning.

The present review aimed to collect the available evidences to increase the knowledge about factors involved in breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or more, organizing the factors hierarchically, according to their proximity to the outcome. The results shown here may guide future research on continuous BF, in addition to helping in the establishment of measures that promote longer breastfeeding duration.

Methods

This is a systematic review using a pre-established protocol for searching, selecting, and collecting data, adapted to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines for meta-analysis and systematic review studies.23 As few studies that addressed the maintenance of breastfeeding for 2 years or more were retrieved, the authors chose to study this practice for 12 months or more.

A search was carried out in the Pubmed/Medline, Scielo and Lilacs databases, using the following search terms, based on the Descriptors in Science and Health and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): aleitamento materno, amamentação, breast feeding, breastfeeding, breast milk, human milk, duração, duration, 12 meses, 12 months, 24 meses, 24 months, primeiro ano, first year, segundo ano, second year, prolong*/$, sustain*/$, exten*/$, continu*/$, long-t*/$, factor*/$, determ*/$ and predict*/$. The terms were combined through the Boolean operators AND, NOT, and AND NOT; the symbols (*) and ($) were used to complement the searched words according to their radical, varying with the used database. The terms “revisão, review, gestantes, pregnant woman, pregnancy, gestation, desnutrição, malnutrition” were incorporated into the search terms to facilitate the exclusion of publications that did not meet the criteria for this review. Articles addressing factors associated with breastfeeding, having as an outcome the maintenance of BF for at least 12 months, published between January 2004 and March 2016 and written in Portuguese or English, were selected. There were no restrictions regarding the study site, type of population, study design, and quality. Review articles (systematic or not) and qualitative studies were excluded.

Two independent reviewers carried out the searches and evaluated the articles based on their titles, abstracts, and full text when it was considered potentially eligible. Article inclusion and data extraction were also performed independently; the results were compared and the disagreements resolved by consensus between the two reviewers. In case of non-agreement between the researchers, a third reviewer was consulted.

The quality of evidence was evaluated according to criteria adapted from Parry et al. and Taylor et al.24,25 These criteria take into account: type of study (internal validity), structured summary, introduction with scientific basis and logical explanation, population recruitment method, selection of predefined sampling, information on data collection tools, nonresponse rate information, interviewers’ training, clearly defined method of outcome measurement, statistical analysis, result interpretation, study hypothesis and possible biases considered, result interpretation in the context of current evidence, and generalization. The maximum possible score, according to this criterion, is 30 points.

Once the factors that were tested for association with maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more were identified, they were organized according to the hierarchical theoretical model proposed by Boccolini et al.,26 arranged in four levels according to the chronological proximity of the variables with the outcome. Level 1 (or distal level) grouped the characteristics prior to pregnancy: maternal socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, familial and/or domiciliary. Level 2 (or distal intermediate level) included prenatal care and events occurred during pregnancy. Level 3 (or proximal intermediate level) comprised the characteristics of delivery, immediate postpartum, and newborn care, in addition to events that occurred between childbirth and hospital discharge. Finally, level 4 (or proximal level) included the characteristics of the women and the infants related to the variables that occurred after hospital discharge, including the infant's feeding.

The variables related to nationality, place of residence (region, municipality, district, neighborhood), and area of residence (urban/rural, slum/not slum, countryside/capital) were classified as contextual factors, that is, characteristics related to the social, economic, and demographic context shared by the nursing mothers that can influence the duration of BF.26

Results

A total of 1174 potentially relevant articles for the review were retrieved (Medline n=833, Lilacs n=161, Scielo n=177, and three were manually searched, that is, identified through the list of article citations in publications retrieved by searching the databases), of which 272 were selected for abstract reading. After reading these, 95 articles were selected for full-text reading; among these, 19 met the inclusion criteria and were selected to be part of the review. Fig. 1 shows the inclusion and exclusion flowchart of the articles and Table 1 summarizes the main characteristics and outcomes of the 19 studies.

Figure 1.
(0.31MB).

Study inclusion and exclusion flowchart for the systematic review of factors associated with maintenance of breastfeeding for ≥12 months.12

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the selected studies for a systematic review of factors associated with maintenance of breastfeeding for ≥ 12 months in descending order of year of publication.

First author, year of publication, study country  Design  Population/sample (No. of assessed mother-baby pairs)  Multivariate analysis  Outcome  Factors associated to outcome (association measure/95% CI/p-value)a  Factors not associated with the outcome  Evidence quality scoreb 
Laterra A, 2014, Haiti39  Cross-sectional  Mothers aged ≥18 years and children aged ≤2 years from four Haitian departments/administrative divisions/310  Yes  BF 20–24 months  None  Area of residence (urban or rural)
Region of residence
Maternal age
Parity
Maternal level of schooling
Annual family income
Place of last childbirth
Birth attended by health professional
Maternal work
Maternal workload outside the home
Age of the youngest child 
19 
Yalçin SS, 2014, Turkey42  Population-based
Cross-sectional 
Children 12–35 months of age living with their mothers/1666  Yes  BF12 months  Maternal age 30–34 years at the child's birth (aOR=1.94; 95%CI 1.13–3.32) when compared to mothers <19 years
Higher order of birth (≥5th) of the child associated with a longer interval between deliveries (≥24 months) (aOR=2.20, 95% CI: 1.30–3.72)
Wedding with religious ceremony (aOR=2.54, 95% CI: 1.06–6.07)
Passive maternal exposure to tobacco (aOR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.95) when compared to non-smoking mothers
Mother who smoked (aOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.45–0.83) when compared to non-smoking mothers
Overweight mother (BMI 25–29.9kg/m2) (aOR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.02–1.68)
Not using any contraceptive method (aOR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.37–0.71) when compared to traditional methods
Using modern non-hormonal contraceptive methods (aOR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.45–0.77) when compared to traditional methods
Using hormonal contraceptives (aOR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.30–0.75) when compared to traditional methods
Bottle-fed child (aOR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.29–0.45)
Exclusively breastfed infant in the first 3 days of life (aOR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.16–1.82) 
Place of residence
Region of residence
Birth order
Birth interval
Family with 6 or more members
Maternal education
Having a dowry at the wedding
Family constitution
Paternal age
Paternal education
Family income
Having health insurance
Number of prenatal visits
Type of birth
Place of birth
Beginning of breastfeeding within the first hour of life
Weight at birth
Child's gender
Maternal work
Age of child (12–23 months versus 24–36 months)
Weight/age of child
Height/age of child
Weight/height of the child
BMI/age of child 
20 
Hure AJ, 2013, Australia40  Population-based cohort  Mothers aged 30–36 years/9773  No  BF12 months and ≥24 months  Outcome12 months:
Older maternal age at delivery (p<0.01)
Higher order of birth of the child (p<0.01)
Higher maternal level of schooling
(p<0.01)
Mother is married (p<0.01)
Full-term child and/or with adequate birth weight (p<0.01)
Lower level of maternal concern related to money (p<0.01)
Outcome24 months:
Older maternal age at delivery (p<0.01)
Higher order of birth of the child (p<0.01)
Higher maternal level of schooling (p<0.01)
Mother is single (p<0.01) 
Place of residence  23 
dos S Neto ET, 2013, Brazil29  Cohort  Children and mothers residing in two areas covered by the Family Health Strategy of the Unified Health System in the municipality of Vitória, ES/67  Yes  BF12 months  Older maternal age (>35 years; p=0.002)
Did not start pacifier suction in the 1st month of life (p=0.005)
Did not start artificial feeding in the 1st month of life (p=0.01) 
Number of children born alive
Number of siblings from the same mother
Number of children under 5 in the house
Interbirth interval
Number of individuals living in the same house
Maternal level of schooling
Maternal marital status
Marital stability
Paternal occupation
Monthly family income
House finishing
Number of rooms in the house
Maternal occupation
Child started using pacifier before the third month of life
Child started using pacifier before the sixth month of life
Child was bottle-fed
Child received formula before the sixth month of life 
17 
Al-Kohji S, 2012, Qatar38  Cross-sectional  Arab mothers and children under 24 months attending a Primary Health Care Center/770  No  BF12 months  None  Nationality
Maternal age
Parity
Maternal level of schooling
Monthly family income
Receiving guidance about infant feeding during prenatal care
Mother received formula ads during prenatal care
Type of birth
Place of delivery (type of hospital)
Rooming-in
Easy access to get support for feeding problems after childbirth
Mother received formula ads before discharge
Meaning of exclusive breastfeeding for mothers
Maternal opinion on the appropriate position for breastfeeding
Child's gender
Maternal occupation
Planned feeding method for the child
Breastfeeding on demand 
20 
Bertino E, 2012, Italy34  Cohort  Children born in a hospital in Turin, and their mothers/562  Yes  BF12 months  High score of the maternal attitude toward breastfeeding (mothers favorable to breastfeeding compared with those favorable to using formula to feed their children; p=0.003)  Maternal nationality
Parity
Maternal level of schooling
Type of birth
Rooming-in practice
Maternal employment situation
Maternal smoking before pregnancy
Maternal smoking during pregnancy
Paternal smoking during pregnancy
Maternal BMI
Child uses pacifier 
16 
Langellier BA, 2012, United States21  Cross-sectional  Mothers and children participating in Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Woman, Infants and Children (WIC)/4725  Yes  BF12 or ≥24 months  Outcome12 months:
Foreign mother (aOR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.41–2.43)
Interview carried out in Spanish (aOR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.14–1.47)
Mother intends to breastfeed (aOR=2.80, 95% CI: 2.05–3.8)
Non-exclusive breastfeeding at the maternity hospital (aOR=3.52, 95% CI: 2.75–4.51) when compared with non-breastfeeding
Exclusive breastfeeding in the maternity hospital (aOR=8.04, 95% CI: 6.17–10.49) when compared to non-breastfeeding
Mother resides with the child's father (aOR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.06–1.61)
Maternal return to work up to three months postpartum (aOR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.45–0.8)
Outcome24 months:
Interview carried out in Spanish (aOR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.10–3.25)
Mother intends to breastfeed (aOR=2.07, 95% CI: 1.15–3.75)
Non-exclusive breastfeeding at the maternity hospital (aOR=2.72, 95% CI: 1.64–4.50) when compared to non-breastfeeding
Exclusive breastfeeding at the maternity hospital (aOR=5.72, 95% CI: 3.44–9.52) when compared to non-breastfeeding
Maternal return to work up to three months postpartum (aOR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.88) 
Maternal age
Maternal level of schooling
Maternal ethnicity
Child receiving formula at the hospital
Participation in the WIC
Child's gender
Age of child 
17 
Martins EJ, 2012, Brazil22  Cohort  Children born in a hospital in Porto Alegre, RS and their mothers/151  Yes  BF24 months  Mother living with the child's father (aOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.37–0.99)
Mother staying at home with the child in the first 6 months of life (aOR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.12–4.05)
Child not using a pacifier (aOR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.58–3.81)
Delay the introduction of water and/or teas to the child's diet (aOR=1.005, 95% CI: 1.001–1.009)
Delay the introduction of other types of milk to the child's diet (aOR=1.001, 95% CI: 1.001–1.002) 
Maternal age
Parity
Maternal level of schooling
Mother's skin color/ethnicity
Time of breastfeeding of previous children
Receive guidance about BF in prenatal care
Number of prenatal visits
Type of birth
Child received formula at the maternity hospital
Child's gender
Mother lives with her mother-in-law.
Maternal smoking during pregnancy
Age at which child started receiving solid/semi-solid foods 
16 
Senarath U, 2012, Sri Lanka36  Cross-sectional  Mothers aged 15–49 with children up to 24 months of age/2735  Yes  BF12 months  Living in rural areas compared to tea-producing properties (p<0.01)
Not residing in the Central Province compared to the West Province (p=0.01)
Vaginal delivery (p<0.01)
Receiving at least one home visit by postpartum health workers (p=0.01) 
Maternal age
Child's birth order
Birth interval between the two last births
Maternal level of schooling
Maternal marital status
Paternal level of schooling
Family income
Number of prenatal visits in clinics
Receiving home visits by health workers during pregnancy
Place of delivery
Birth weight
Child's gender
Maternal occupation
Maternal BMI
Maternal participation in family decisions 
16 
Demétrio F, 2012, Brazil27  Cohort  Children born in public maternity hospitals in the municipalities of Laje and Mutuípe, BA/531  Yes  BF24 months  Residing in the rural area (p<0.05)
Mother received prenatal care (p<0.05) 
Maternal age
Maternal level of schooling
Skin color
Housing status index
Type of birth
Birth weight
Child's gender
Gestation time
Maternal work outside the home after childbirth
Maximum height of the mother
Pre-gestational maternal anthropometric status
Post-gestational maternal anthropometric status 
17 
Carletti C, 2011, Italy35  Cohort  Children born in a hospital in Trieste and their mothers/93  Yes  BF12 months  Maternal age 30–34 years compared with mothers aged >34 years (p=0.026)  Maternal nationality
Parity
Maternal level of schooling
Maternal marital status
Duration of previous breastfeeding
Type of delivery
Child admitted at the hospital after birth
Child's birth weight
Child's birth length
Gestational age
Child had jaundice at birth
Child had respiratory difficulty at birth
Maternal occupation
Maternal return to work 
16 
Kristiansen AL, 2010, Norway32  Population-based cohort  All children born in Norway from April 17 to May 8, 2006/1490  Yes  BF12 months  Older maternal age (25–34 years old: aOR=1.99, 95% CI: 1.13–3.50/≥35 years old: aOR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.30–4.44) compared with mothers ≤24 years
Mother of a second child (aOR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.57–0.97)
Higher maternal schooling (higher education ≤4 years: aOR=2.33;
95% CI: 1.17–4.65/higher education >4 years: aOR=2.81; 95%CI: 1.39–5.66) when compared to mothers with primary and secondary education
Lower child's birth weight (aOR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.21–0.72)
Mother smoked during pregnancy (aOR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.34–0.71)
Child has a caregiver other than the parents (aOR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.50–0.82) 
Geographical region of residence
Maternal marital status
Paternal level of schooling
Family history of asthma/allergy
Maternal occupation at the child's birth
Maternal occupation at 12 months of the child's life
Mother smoking at 6 months of the child's life 
24 
Wallby T, 2009, Sweden37  Cross-sectional  Children born between 1997 and 2001 living in the city of Uppsala/12.197  Yes  BF12 months  Non-Swedish mother (from Eastern Europe and Balkan countries: aHR=1.63; 95% CI: 1.29–2.06/from Africa: aHR=2.14; 95% CI: 1.73–2.64/from the Middle East: aHR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.49–2.01/from South and East Asia: aHR=1.72, 95% CI: 1.38–2.15)
Lower family income (Quartile 1: aHR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.10–1.39)
Smoking mother (aHR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.61–0.80) 
Type of delivery  20 
Senarath U, 2007, East Timor43  Cross-sectional  Children aged 0–23 months living in urban and rural areas of the study country, selected from a population sample of a study carried out in 2003/2162  Yes, but only for the outcome BF12  BF12 months or ≥24 months  Outcome ≥12 months:
Home delivery (p=0.01)
Mothers who worked in the 12 months prior to the interview (p=0.01)
Younger age of the child (p=0.01)
Outcome ≥24 months:
Not residing in the eastern rural area (p=0.001)
Living in the mountains (p=0.001)
Mother aged <35 years old (p<0.01)
Number of children <4 (p<0.05)
Being illiterate or having attended only elementary school (p<0.01)
Not belonging to the wealthiest social stratum (p<0.05) 
Child's gender  20 
Singh GK, 2007, United States30  Population-based cross-sectional  Children younger than 6 years/33,121  Yes  BF12 months  Residing in a metropolitan region (p=0.05)
Children born in the United States, to immigrant parents, compared to US children born to American parents (p=0.05)
White, non-Hispanic mothers compared with non-Hispanic Black mothers (p=0.05)
Family composition: not being the child of a single mother and not being the child of adoptive parents when compared to the children of biological parents (p=0.05)
Parents’ level of schooling ≥ 13 years (p=0.05)
Female child (p=0.05)
High level of family or social support (p=0.05)
Not having a smoker at home (p=0.05) 
Safety in the home district
Child's birth order
Level of family poverty
Maternal physical health status
Maternal emotional health status
Maternal physical activity 
25 
Carrascoza KC, 2005, Brazil28  Cross-sectional  Children from a dental care center for special patients and their mothers/80  No  BF12 months  Older maternal age (p=0.0331)
Higher number of children (p=0.0175)
Mother is married (p=0.0078)
Lower socioeconomic class (p<0.05)
Mother had previous experience with breastfeeding (p=0.0058) 
Mother received guidance on breastfeeding during pregnancy
Mother's intention to breastfeed during pregnancy
Type of delivery 
13 
Hajian-Tilaki KO, 2005, Iran41  Cross-sectional  Mothers of children aged 12–24 months/600  Yes  BF24 months  Living in rural areas (p<0.05)
Greater parity (p<0.05)
Higher maternal schooling (p<0.05)
Mother did not work outside the home (p<0.05)
Lower maternal stress level (p<0.05) 
Maternal age
Child's gender 
17 
Li R, 2005, United States31  Cross-sectional  Children aged 19–35 months who participated in the National Immunization Survey of 2002/3507  No  BF12 months  Residing in the Pacific region (p<0.05)
Older maternal age (p<0.05)
Higher maternal schooling (p<0.05)
Mother is married (p<0.05)
White non-Hispanic mother (p<0.05)
Mother/child not participating in the WIC program (p<0.05) for mothers and children in the first year of life
Child did not have a nanny at 6 months (p<0.05) 
Child's birth order
Poverty level
Child's Gender 
21 
Lande B, 2004, Norway33  Cross-sectional  12-month-old children born to Norwegian mothers or mothers from another Scandinavian country/1932  Yes  BF at 12 months  Residing in a place with a higher degree of urbanization (aOR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.04–1.72)
Older maternal age (25–34 years old: aOR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.03–2.05/≥35 years old: aOR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.58–3.51) when compared with mothers aged <25 years
Higher maternal level of schooling (≥13 years) (aOR=2.48, 95% CI: 1.63–3.77)
Presence of allergy/asthma among family members (aOR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.14–1.71)
Mother smoking at six months of child's life (aOR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.44–0.74)
Child does not have a baby-sitter (aOR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.15–1.77) 
Child's gender  24 

BF, maternal breastfeeding; OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; p, p value; BMI, body mass index.

a

Variables with significant values of OR or HR greater than 1.00 indicate a greater chance of breastfeeding maintenance, and OR or HR<1.00 indicate a lower chance.

b

Adapted from Parry et al.24 and Taylor et al.25

Four studies were carried out in Brazil,22,27–29 three in the United States,21,30,31 two in Norway,32,33 two in Italy,34,35 and one in each of the following countries: Sri Lanka,36 Sweden,37 Qatar,38 Haiti,39 Australia,40 Iran,41 Turkey,42 and East Timor.43 Of the 19 selected articles, seven were cohort22,27,29,32,34,35,40 and 12 were cross-sectional studies.21,28,30,31,33,36–39,41–43 The publication quality ranged from 1328 to 26 points.32

Seventy-five factors were tested for the association with maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more (Fig. 2). The number of associations of the same variable with the outcome may be higher than the number of studies investigating it, since some authors have categorized the same variable into more than two categories or evaluated it under different aspects. Yalçin et al.,42 for instance, investigated active maternal exposure to tobacco, as well as exposure to passive smoke.

Figure 2.
(0.74MB).

Hierarchical theoretical model of the variables evaluated for possible association with maintenance of breastfeeding for ≥12 months of age. aVariable (number of evaluations of the association with outcome/number of associations with outcome).

The distal level was the hierarchical level submitted to the most evaluations (20 variables and 93 evaluations), followed by the proximal (23 variables and 73 evaluations), proximal intermediate (20 variables and 52 evaluations), and distal intermediate (nine variables and 16 evaluations). Contextual factors, although encompassing only three variables, were evaluated 22 times.

The factors most frequently assessed were: level of schooling21,22,27,29,31–36,38–43 and maternal age21,22,27–29,31–33,35,36,38–43; parity,22,28,30–32,34–36,38–43 maternal occupation21,27,29,32,34–36,38,39,41–43 and region of residence27,30–33,36,39–43; child's gender21,22,27,30,31,33,36,38,41–43; maternal exposure to tobacco22,30,32–34,37,42; family income28–31,36–39,42,43; type of delivery22,27,28,34–38,42; and maternal marital status.28,29,31,32,35,36,40 The number of evaluations of the assessed factors is shown in Fig. 2. Thirty-nine variables were associated with the outcome at least once; the most frequent were maternal age28,29,31–33,42 and some type of maternal exposure to tobacco30,32,33,37,42 (six associations), level of maternal schooling31–33,40,41 (five associations), and number of children28,32,40,41 (four associations). Fig. 2 shows the number of times each variable was associated with the outcome.

The factors with the highest percentages of associations with breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or more, considering the number of times they were tested, were children having parents as caregivers (100%), none maternal exposure to tobacco (54.5%), children and/or parents being immigrants/foreigners (50%), living in the urban area (42.9%), older mothers (40%), married mothers (37.5%), higher maternal level of schooling (31.3%), higher number of children (30.8%), and lower family income (30%).

Discussion

The knowledge of factors associated with the maintenance of breastfeeding for at least 12 months may help in the planning of health actions aimed at increasing the proportion of women who breastfeed according to the international recommendation of 2 years or more. The present systematic review identified 39 variables associated with maintaining breastfeeding for 12 months or more in at least one study.

Several factors grouped at the distal level, such as maternal older age and higher level of schooling, married mother, higher number of children, and lower family income, showed a high percentage of associations with the maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more, considering the number of times they were tested. This finding demonstrates that the prolongation of breastfeeding suffers significant influence of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. In turn, when exclusive breastfeeding is assessed in the first 6 months of life, factors closer to the outcome are those most frequently associated with this practice, such as maternal occupation, pre- and postpartum counseling, maternal knowledge about breastfeeding, and type of delivery.26,44,45

Six associations were found between older maternal age and breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or more. This result can be attributed to the greater emotional stability and experience acquired with previous children, which allow the mother to deal with eventual complications during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period.46,47 A higher number of children favored the maintenance of BF.32,40,41 As with maternal age, parity may be related to greater experience of women regarding several aspects that may positively influence BF.28

The association between maternal level of schooling and breastfeeding duration for 12 months or more was observed in six of the 16 studies that analyzed this association.31–33,40,41,43 These studies, mostly from high-income countries, found that higher levels of maternal schooling31–33,40,41 were positively associated with longer BF duration, except for a study carried out in East Timor, which found an association between lower level of schooling and breastfeeding maintenance.43 This finding corroborates recent data published by Victora et al.,4 indicating that, in high-income countries, breastfeeding is more common in women with a better socioeconomic level. In Brazil, a middle-income country, a systematic review found an association between a higher level of maternal schooling and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding in almost half of the reviewed studies.26

The association between lower family income and maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more was detected in three28,37,43 of the ten28–31,36–39,42,43 studies in which this variable was assessed. It is noteworthy that one of these three studies was carried out in Brazil,28 and the others in a high-income37 (Sweden) and in a low-income (East Timor) country.43 It is worth remembering that, in the Swedish study, this finding may be associated with the fact that the women who breastfed longer were immigrants.37 In low- and middle-income countries, breastfeeding is one of the few health-related positive behaviors that is most prevalent among the poorest population.4 It is possible that this finding is related to the economic benefit of breastfeeding.2

Maternal marital status presented a different behavior regarding the association direction. Being a single mother was a protective factor for BF at 12 months or more and a risk factor at 2 years or more.40 Further studies are required to better understand a possible ambivalent influence of the child's father/mother's partner on BF duration.

Previous experience with breastfeeding,28 presence of allergy/asthma in the children's parents and relatives,33 attendance at prenatal consultations,27 and the mother's intention to breastfeed during pregnancy21 were the distal intermediate level variables reported to be associated with the outcome. It is expected that prenatal consultations with information on breastfeeding, intention to breastfeed during pregnancy, and having previous experience with breastfeeding are factors that help women to face possible BF difficulties and, thus, promote the prolongation of breastfeeding.46,48,49 The association between the presence of allergy/asthma in parents and family members may have its origin in the concern for children's health, since among the long-term benefits of breastfeeding is protection against asthma and eczema, especially in low-income countries.50

Among the delivery and birth characteristics, although type of delivery was evaluated in nine22,27,28,34–38,42 of the 19 selected studies, only one study demonstrated that vaginal delivery was a protection factor for maintenance of BF for 12 months or more.36 In turn, several studies documented the association between cesarean-section delivery and early weaning.51–53 This apparent discrepancy is not surprising, since it appears reasonable that cesarean sections negatively interfere with BF at the beginning of the process and not with its maintenance for a prolonged period of time.

Among the factors classified as proximal, the absence of maternal exposure to smoking was the individual variable with the second highest number of evaluations (11)22,30,32–34,37,42 and associations (six).30,32,33,37,42 Such association may be due to the negative interference of nicotine in breast milk production,54 as well as the profile of smoking women, less favorable to the maintenance of BF for a longer period of time.37

Three21,41,43 of 14 evaluations21,27,29,32,34–36,38,39,41–43 that assessed maternal work showed an association between this variable and duration of breastfeeding. Studies carried out in the United States21 and Iran41 found that mothers working outside the home were less likely to maintain breastfeeding for 12 months or more. A study carried out in East Timor43 showed the opposite, that is, working mothers were more likely to breastfeed their children aged 12 months. This is an association that deserves to be investigated, since maternal work outside the home can be expected to negatively interfere in breastfeeding maintenance due to the supposed physical separation between mother and child. It is possible that maternal work is more informal in East Timor, allowing women to take their children to work, thus favoring the maintenance of breastfeeding.

Two22,29 of the three studies that explored the association between pacifier use and maintenance of breastfeeding described longer BF duration among children who did not use this object. It has been well documented that pacifier use is strongly associated with early weaning and interruption of exclusive breastfeeding.26,55 This review showed that pacifier use also negatively interferes with BF maintenance for at least 12 months.

Two studies investigated the interference of the mother's cohabitation with the child's father on the duration of BF.21,22 It has been previously reported that cohabitation with the child's father is a protective factor against early weaning.20 However, in the study conducted in Brazil, the mother's cohabitation with her partner/child's father was a risk factor for the maintenance of breastfeeding for 2 years or more. This discrepancy raises the hypothesis that fathers initially encourage breastfeeding, but that, after some time, due to lack of knowledge about the recommendation of breastfeeding duration for 2 years or more or for another reason, they discourage the practice.22 It has been reported that some fathers feel that breastfeeding is harmful to breasts; interferes with the relationship between the father and the child; interferes with the couple's relationship, including sexual intercourse; and causes feelings of exclusion, abandonment, and jealousy, among others.56 Additionally, cohabitation with the husband/partner may result in more workload for the woman, especially if he does not share household chores with her.

Among the factors classified as contextual, the association between region of residence and breastfeeding for 12 months or more was investigated in 14 studies,27,30–33,36,39–43 and nine associations were found.27,30,31,33,36,41,43 In three studies,30,33,43 two of them carried out in high-income countries,30,43 living in an urban/metropolitan area was a protection factor for BF maintenance for 12 months or more. However, in three other studies carried out in Brazil,27 Iran,41 and Sri Lanka,36 middle-income countries, living in urban areas was characterized as a risk factor for long-term BF. This discrepancy between the results can be explained by cultural differences. The fact that three studies21,30,37 observed that being an immigrant favored the increased duration of breastfeeding corroborates this hypothesis.

The present review has the merit of being a comprehensive study, including studies from different countries with different methodological approaches, in addition to having organized the factors described in the literature as associated with longer BF duration in hierarchical levels, facilitating the understanding of the characteristics involved in the maintenance of breastfeeding for at least 12 months.

Conversely, the geographical heterogeneity of the studies included in the review may be a limitation to the applicability of the present results, as the risk factors and protection factors may vary according to the individual and environmental characteristics of the different population groups. The methodological limitations of some studies, including not using multivariate models for data analysis,28,31,38,40 may also have impaired some results. Moreover, several factors associated with BF maintenance were tested in only one study.

In conclusion, the maintenance of breastfeeding for 12 months or more is strongly influenced by contextual factors and some maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Factors related to prenatal care, delivery, and the postpartum period also influence the assessed outcome, but to a lesser degree. It is evident that the determinants of breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or longer may differ between populations, as well as the magnitude of associations. Therefore, it is necessary to know the several factors associated with continued breastfeeding in different sociocultural contexts, so that interventions can be performed in the modifiable variables.

Nonetheless, some factors were associated with maintenance of breastfeeding in almost all the assessed places, such as the mother's older age, greater number of children, higher level of education, and non use of pacifiers by the child. Thus, the hierarchical theoretical model constructed with the results of this review, which describes the previously explored factors and those associated with BF maintenance, may guide future studies aimed at exploring the facilitators and obstacles to continued breastfeeding in different contexts.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
World Health Organization
Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals
World Health Organization, (2009)
[2]
N.C. Rollins,N. Bhandari,N. Hajeebhoy,S. Horton,C.K. Lutter,J.C. Martines
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?
[3]
C.G. Victora,B.L. Horta,C.L. de Mola,L. Quevedo,R.T. Pinheiro,D.P. Gigante
Association between breastfeeding and intelligence, educational attainment, and income at 30 years of age: a prospective birth cohort study from Brazil
Lancet Glob Health, 3 (2015), pp. e199-e205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70002-1
[4]
C.G. Victora,R. Bahl,A.J. Barros,G.V. França,S. Horton,J. Krasevec
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect
[5]
M.J. Sankar,B. Sinha,R. Chowdhury,N. Bhandari,S. Taneja,J. Martines
Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acta Paediatr, 104 (2015), pp. 3-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13147
[6]
B.L. Horta,C. Loret de Mola,C.G. Victora
Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acta Paediatr, 104 (2015), pp. 30-37 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13133
[7]
A.D. Liese,T. Hirsch,E. von Mutius,U. Keil,W. Leupold,S.K. Weiland
Inverse association of overweight and breast feeding in 9–10-year-old children in Germany
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 25 (2001), pp. 1644-1650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801800
[8]
H. Fallahzadeh,M. Golestan,T. Rezvanian,Z. Ghasemian
Breast-feeding history and overweight in 11–13-year-old children in Iran
World J Pediatr, 5 (2009), pp. 36-41 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-009-0006-5
[9]
T. Harder,R. Bergmann,G. Kallischnigg,A. Plagemann
Duration of breastfeeding and risk of overweight: a meta-analysis
Am J Epidemiol, 162 (2005), pp. 397-403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi222
[10]
K.G. Peres,A.M. Cascaes,G.G. Nascimento,C.G. Victora
Effect of breastfeeding on malocclusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acta Paediatr, 104 (2015), pp. 54-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13103
[11]
S.C. Pires,E.R. Giugliani,F. Caramez da Silva
Influence of the duration of breastfeeding on quality of muscle function during mastication in preschoolers: a cohort study
BMC Public Health, 12 (2012), pp. 934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-934
[12]
C. Hoefer,M.C. Hardy
Later development of breast fed and artificially fed infants: comparison of physical and mental growth
J Am Med Assoc, 92 (1929), pp. 615-619
[13]
B.L. Horta,C. Loret de Mola,C.G. Victora
Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor, 104 (2015), pp. 14-19
[14]
M.B. Belfort,S.L. Rifas-Shiman,K.P. Kleinman,L.B. Guthrie,D.C. Bellinger,E.M. Taveras
Infant feeding and childhood cognition at ages 3 and 7 years: effects of breastfeeding duration and exclusivity
JAMA Pediatr, 167 (2013), pp. 836-844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.455
[15]
Ministério da Saúde
Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher – PNDS 2006: dimensões do processo reprodutivo e da saúde da criança
Ministério da Saúde, (2009)
[16]
C.S. Boccolini,P. Boccolini,E.R.J. Giugliani,S. Venâncio,F. Monteiro
Tendência de indicadores do aleitamento materno no Brasil em três décadas
Rev Saude Publ. No prelo, (2017)
[17]
K. Wijndaele,R. Lakshman,J.R. Landsbaugh,K.K. Ong,D. Ogilvie
Determinants of early weaning and use of unmodified cow's milk in infants: a systematic review
J Acad Nutr Diet, 109 (2009), pp. 2017-2028
[18]
A.H. Garcia,T. Voortman,C.P. Baena,R. Chowdhurry,T. Muka,L. Jaspers
Maternal weight status, diet, and supplement use as determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nutr Rev, 74 (2016), pp. 490-516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuw016
[19]
R. Turcksin,S. Bel,S. Galjaard,R. Devlieger
Maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation, intensity and duration: a systematic review
Matern Child Nutr, 10 (2014), pp. 166-183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00439.x
[20]
R.J. Quinlan,M.B. Quinlan,M.V. Flinn
Parental investment and age at weaning in a Caribbean village
Evol Hum Behav, 24 (2003), pp. 1-16
[21]
B.A. Langellier,M. Pia Chaparro,S.E. Whaley
Social and institutional factors that affect breastfeeding duration among WIC participants in Los Angeles County, California
Matern Child Health J, 16 (2012), pp. 1887-1895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0937-z
[22]
E.J. Martins,E.R. Giugliani
Which women breastfeed for 2 years or more?
J Pediatr (Rio J), 88 (2012), pp. 67-73
[23]
D. Moher,A. Liberati,J. Tetzlaff,D.G. Altman
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
Ann Intern Med, 151 (2009), pp. 264-269
[24]
L.L. Parry,G. Netuveli,J. Parry,S. Saxena
A systematic review of parental perception of overweight status in children
J Ambul Care Manag, 31 (2008), pp. 253-268
[25]
B.J. Taylor,M. Dempster,M. Donnelly
Grading gems: appraising the quality of research for social work and social care
Br J Soc Work, 37 (2007), pp. 335-354
[26]
C.S. Boccolini,M.L. de Carvalho,M.I.C. de Oliveira
Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life in Brazil: a systematic review
Rev Saude Publ, (2015)pp. 49
pii:S0034-89102015000100409
[27]
F. Demétrio,E.J. Pinto,A.M. Assis
Factors associated with early breastfeeding cessation: a birth cohort study in two municipalities in the Recôncavo region, Bahia State, Brazil
Cad Saude Publica, 28 (2012), pp. 641-650
[28]
K.C. Carrascoza,C. Júnior,Á. Luiz,A.B.A. de Moraes
The early weaning and extended breastfeeding influent factors
Estud Psicol Camp, 22 (2005), pp. 433-440
[29]
E.T. dos S Neto,E. Zandonade,A.O. Emmerich
Analysis models for variables associated with breastfeeding duration
Rev Paul Pediatr, 31 (2013), pp. 306-314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822013000300006
[30]
G.K. Singh,M.D. Kogan,D.L. Dee
Nativity/immigrant status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic determinants of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States, 2003
Pediatrics, 119 (2007), pp. S38-S46 http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2089G
[31]
R. Li,N. Darling,E. Maurice,L. Barker,L.M. Grummer-Strawn
Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: the 2002 National Immunization Survey
Pediatrics, 115 (2005), pp. e31-e37 http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0481
[32]
A.L. Kristiansen,B. Lande,N.C. Øverby,L.F. Andersen
Factors associated with exclusive breast-feeding and breast-feeding in Norway
Public Health Nutr, 13 (2010), pp. 2087-2096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010002156
[33]
B. Lande,L.F. Andersen,M.B. Veierød,A. Baerug,L. Johansson,K.U. Trygg
Breast-feeding at 12 months of age and dietary habits among breast-fed and non-breast-fed infants
Public Health Nutr, 7 (2004), pp. 495-503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PHN2003550
[34]
E. Bertino,A. Varalda,F. Magnetti,P. Di Nicola,E. Cester,L. Occhi
Is breastfeeding duration influenced by maternal attitude and knowledge? A longitudinal study during the first year of life
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 25 (2012), pp. 32-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.712341
[35]
C. Carletti,P. Pani,A. Knowles,L. Monasta,M. Montico,A. Cattaneo
Breastfeeding to 24 months of age in the northeast of Italy: a cohort study
Breastfeed Med Off J Acad Breastfeed Med, 6 (2011), pp. 177-182
[36]
U. Senarath,I. Siriwardena,S.S. Godakandage,H. Jayawickrama,D.N. Fernando,M.J. Dibley
Determinants of breastfeeding practices: an analysis of the Sri Lanka Demographic and Health Survey 2006–2007
Matern Child Nutr, 8 (2012), pp. 315-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00321.x
[37]
T. Wallby,A. Hjern
Region of birth, income and breastfeeding in a Swedish county
Acta Paediatr, 98 (2009), pp. 1799-1804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01455.x
[38]
S. Al-Kohji,H.A. Said,N.A. Selim
Breastfeeding practice and determinants among Arab mothers in Qatar
Saudi Med J, 33 (2012), pp. 436-443
[39]
A. Laterra,M.A. Ayoya,J.-M. Beaulière,M. Bienfait,H. Pachón
Infant and young child feeding in four departments in Haiti: mixed-method study on prevalence of recommended practices and related attitudes, beliefs, and other determinants
Rev Panam Salud Publica, 36 (2014), pp. 306-313
[40]
A.J. Hure,J.R. Powers,C.L. Chojenta,J.E. Byles,D. Loxton
Poor adherence to national and international breastfeeding duration targets in an Australian longitudinal cohort
[41]
K.O. Hajian-Tilaki
Factors associated with the pattern of breastfeeding in the north of Iran
Ann Hum Biol, 32 (2005), pp. 702-713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014460500272764
[42]
S.S. Yalçın,S. Yalçın,E. Kurtuluş-Yiğit
Determinants of continued breastfeeding beyond 12 months in Turkey: secondary data analysis of the Demographic and Health Survey
Turk J Pediatr, 56 (2014), pp. 581-591
[43]
U. Senarath,M.J. Dibley,K.E. Agho
Breastfeeding practices and associated factors among children under 24 months of age in Timor-Leste
Eur J Clin Nutr, 61 (2007), pp. 387-397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602536
[44]
T. Shifraw,A. Worku,Y. Berhane
Factors associated exclusive breastfeeding practices of urban women in Addis Ababa public health centers, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study
Int Breastfeed J, 10 (2015), pp. 22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0047-4
[45]
G. Mekuria,M. Edris
Exclusive breastfeeding and associated factors among mothers in Debre Markos, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
Int Breastfeed J, 10 (2015), pp. 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-014-0027-0
[46]
F.T. Faleiros,E.M. Trezza,L. Carandina
Aleitamento materno: fatores de influência na sua decisão e duração
Rev Nutr, 19 (2006), pp. 623-630
[47]
P. de S. Queiros,L.R. de Oliveira,C.L. Martins
Rev Salud Pública, (2009)pp. 6-14
[48]
W. Wang,Y. Lau,A. Chow,K.S. Chan
Breast-feeding intention, initiation and duration among Hong Kong Chinese women: a prospective longitudinal study
Midwifery, 30 (2014), pp. 678-687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.015
[49]
T. Tewabe,A. Mandesh,T. Gualu,G. Alem,G. Mekuria,H. Zeleke
Exclusive breastfeeding practice and associated factors among mothers in Motta town, East Gojjam zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2015: a cross-sectional study
Int Breastfeed J, 12 (2016), pp. 12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0103-3
[50]
C.J. Lodge,D.J. Tan,M.X. Lau,X. Dai,R. Tham,A.J. Lowe
Breastfeeding and asthma and allergies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Acta Paediatr, 104 (2015), pp. 38-53 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13132
[51]
G. Saeed,S. Fakhar,T. Imran,L.K. Abbas
The effect of modes of delivery on infants’ feeding practices
Iran J Med Sci, 36 (2011), pp. 128-132
[52]
E. Weiderpass,F.C. Barros,C.G. Victora,E. Tomasi,R. Halpern
Incidence and duration of breast-feeding by pattern of delivery: a longitudinal study in Southeastern Brazil
Rev Saude Publica, 32 (1998), pp. 225-231
[53]
E.R. Giugliani,L.C. do Espírito Santo,L.D. de Oliveira,D. Aerts
Intake of water, herbal teas and non-breast milks during the first month of life: associated factors and impact on breastfeeding duration
Early Hum Dev, 84 (2008), pp. 305-310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.08.001
[54]
B.L. Horta,M.S. Kramer,R.W. Platt
Maternal smoking and the risk of early weaning: a meta-analysis
Am J Public Health, 91 (2001), pp. 304-307
[55]
G.D. Buccini,R. Pérez-Escamilla,L.M. Paulino,C.L. Araújo,S.I. Venancio
Pacifier use and interruption of exclusive breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis
Matern Child Nutr, 13 (2017), pp. e12384
[56]
M. Sharma,R. Petosa
Impact of expectant fathers in breast-feeding decisions
J Am Diet Assoc, 97 (1997), pp. 1311-1313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00312-X

Please cite this article as: Santana GS, Giugliani ER, Vieira TO, Vieira GO. Factors associated with breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or more: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018;94:104–122

Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Article options
Tools
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate assessoria@jped.com.br. Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact assessoria@jped.com.br.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.