The case for dialy dialysis: Its impact on costs and quality of life

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(01)80127-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Research suggests daily hemodialysis may improve clinical outcomes. To date, a comprehensive review of its implications on quality of life has not been performed, and little is known about its economic impact. We conducted an economic evaluation comparing short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis with thrice-weekly conventional in-center dialysis. Data on the quality of life and clinical effects of daily dialysis were obtained from more than 60 reports from 13 daily dialysis programs around the world (n = 197). Cost data were derived principally from the US Renal Data System, Centers for Disease Control, and Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Resource use during daily hemodialysis was modeled after two ongoing programs in the United States. Results suggest that patients feel better and direct treatment costs could be reduced with daily dialysis. Costs are sensitive to assumptions about the effect of daily dialysis on hospital days. Reductions of at least 8% in hospital days are required for these modalities to be cost saving compared with documented reductions of 30% to 100%. Larger well-controlled studies of daily versus conventional dialysis would be helpful to determine whether daily dialysis fulfills these promises. Medicare policy, which limits payment for most patients to three dialysis treatments weekly, poses a disincentive to more widespread adoption among dialysis centers. Given this constraint to broader acceptance, we address several policy options to gain a better understanding of the potential risks and benefits of daily dialysis.

References (57)

  • M.P. Kooistra et al.

    Daily home haemodialysis in the Netherlands: Effects on metabolic control, haemodialysis, and quality of life

    Nephrol Dial Transplant

    (1998)
  • M. Kooistra et al.

    Low-flux daily home hemodialysis (DHHD): Results after 6 months

    Perit Dial Int

    (1998)
  • U. Buoncristiani et al.

    Daily hemodialysis: An optimal treatment for uremic cardiovasculapthy

  • U. Buoncristiani et al.

    Daily dialysis: An optimal treatment for uremic cardiovasculopathy

    Cardionephrology

    (1997)
  • C.R. George et al.

    A preliminary assessment of daily dialysis

    Dial Transplant

    (1977)
  • U. Buoncristiani et al.

    Rationale for daily dialysis

    Home Hemodial Int

    (1997)
  • J.R. Lugon et al.

    Improvements in dialysis adequacy and quality of life by in-center daily hemodialysis

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (1997)
  • A.R. Pinciaroli

    Results of daily hemodialysis in Catanzaro: 12-Year experience with 22 patients treated for more than one year

    Home Hemodial Int

    (1998)
  • U. Buoncristiani et al.

    Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in uremic patients by treatment with daily hemodialysis

    Contrib Nephrol

    (1996)
  • B. Louis et al.

    Clinical experience with long-term 5 days-a-week hemodialysis

  • U. Buoncristiani et al.

    Daily dialysis: Long-term clinical metabolic results

    Kidney Int

    (1988)
  • R. Uldall et al.

    Simplified nocturnal home hemodialysis: A new approach to renal replacement therapy

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (1994)
  • G. Ting et al.

    Short daily hemodialysis—Clinical outcomes and quality of life

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (1998)
  • E.G. Lowrie et al.

    Cooperative dialysis study

    Kidney Int

    (1983)
  • B. Charra et al.

    Importance of treatment time and blood pressure control in achieving long-term survival on dialysis

    Am J Nephrol

    (1996)
  • Z. Twardowski

    Effect of long-term increases in the frequency and/or prolongation of dialysis duration on certain clinical manifestations and results of laboratory investigations in patients with chronic renal failure

    Acta Med Pol

    (1975)
  • R. Kenley

    Will daily home hemodialysis be an important future therapy for end-stage renal disease?

    Semin Dialysis

    (1995)
  • US Renal Data System: USRDS 1998 Annual Data Report

    (1998)
  • Cited by (136)

    • Hemodialysis Centers Guide 2020

      2021, Nefrologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      As negative aspects, short daily hemodialysis could increase complications of the vascular access, including thrombosis108, although canulation of the fistula using the buttonhole technique could reduce these complications146. The cost analyses also appear to favor short daily hemodialysis versus standard hemodialysis, since the lower hospital admissions rate and medications use would compensate the greater expenditure in consumables147. Long nocturnal hemodialysis is also associated to important clinical benefits versus conventional hemodialysis, including improved filtration of uremic toxins, better blood pressure and phosphorus control, a lesser need for drugs, reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy, and improvements in some of the aspects related to patient quality of life and fertility.

    • Frequent Hemodialysis: Physiological, Epidemiological, and Practical Aspects

      2018, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dialysis, and Transplantation: A Companion to Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by Aksys, Ltd, Lincolnshire, IL.

    View full text