Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 125, August 2019, Pages 40-48
Preventive Medicine

Dietary share of ultra-processed foods and metabolic syndrome in the US adult population

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • 10% ultra-processed food consumption increase associated with 4% MetS prevalence increase.

  • The association was stronger in young adults (PR = 1.94).

  • The strength of the association decreased with age.

Abstract

This study sought to examine the relationship between dietary share of ultra-processed foods and metabolic syndrome among US adults. We studied 6, 385 participants from the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2014, aged 20+ years, with blood tests under fasting conditions and at least one 24-hour dietary recall. Food items were classified according to the extent and purpose of industrial food processing. Ultra-processed foods (UPF) are formulations of many ingredients, mostly of exclusive industrial use, that result from a sequence of industrial processes (hence ultra-processed). Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) was defined according to the 2009 Joint Scientific Statement as meeting three or more of the following criteria: (1) elevated waist circumference (2) elevated fasting plasma glucose (3) elevated blood pressure (4) elevated triglycerides (5) reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C). Poisson regression models with robust variance adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, family income, education, physical activity and smoking showed significant linear association between the dietary contribution of UPF and the prevalence of MetS (a 10% increase in contribution was associated with a 4% prevalence increase) (prevalence ratio -PR- = 1.04; 95% CI 1.02, 1.07). A dietary UPF contribution of >71% (5th population quintile) was associated with 28% higher prevalence of MetS compared to a contribution below 40% (1st population quintile) (PR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.09, 1.50). The association was stronger in young adults (PR between upper and lower quintiles = 1.94; 95% CI 1.39, 2.72) and decreased with age. These findings add to the growing evidence that UPF consumption is associated with diet-related non-communicable diseases.

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a complex of multiple, interrelated risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes which occur more often together than by chance alone and for which the cause is often uncertain (Alberti et al., 2009). MetS is not an absolute risk indicator, as it does not contain many of the factors that determine absolute risk, such as age, sex, cigarette smoking, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (Alberti et al., 2009). However, evidence exists that people affected by MetS are at twice the risk of developing CVD over the next 5 to 10 years and have a 5-fold risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to unaffected individuals (Alberti et al., 2009).

In the last decades, worldwide prevalence of MetS has risen dramatically, presumably due to increasing obesity and lifestyle risk factors (Alberti et al., 2009), including poor diet (Martínez-González and Martín-Calvo, 2013). Still, the most appropriate diet for prevention and treatment of MetS remains uncertain (Pérez-Martínez et al., 2017). Recent studies suggest that using overall dietary patterns rather than isolated nutrients may better appraise the association between diet and MetS (Martínez-González and Martín-Calvo, 2013). In this sense, evidence is supportive of a beneficial effect on MetS of the adherence to “a priori defined” Mediterranean dietary pattern (Martínez-González and Martín-Calvo, 2013; Pérez-Martínez et al., 2017; Kastorini et al., 2011; Gouveri and Diamantopoulos, 2015; Babio et al., 2014) and also, though studies are scarce (Pérez-Martínez et al., 2017), to the DASH diet or Northern Europe dietary pattern (Calton et al., 2014; Azadbakht et al., 2005; Adamsson et al., 2012). Conversely, other studies including two recent meta-analyses (Martínez-González and Martín-Calvo, 2013; Rodríguez-Monforte et al., 2017; Shab-Bidar et al., 2018; Agodi et al., 2018; Esmaillzadeh et al., 2007; Heidemann et al., 2011) have confirmed that greater adherence to “a posteriori-defined” Western dietary pattern is associated with an increased risk for MetS, while prudent/traditional dietary patterns are associated with a lower prevalence of MetS.

Highly present in Western dietary patterns, ultra-processed foods (UPF) are formulations of many ingredients, mostly of exclusive industrial use, that result from a sequence of industrial processes (hence ultra-processed) (Monteiro et al., 2019). Evidence exists that global food supplies are increasingly dominated by UPF (Moodie et al., 2013; Ultra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: Trends, impact on obesity, policy implications, 2015; Stuckler et al., 2012; Monteiro and Cannon, 2012; Monteiro et al., 2013). Nationally representative studies carried out in the US (Martínez Steele et al., 2017; Martínez Steele and Monteiro, 2017; Martinez Steele et al., 2016), Canada (Moubarac et al., 2017; Moubarac et al., 2012) and other countries (Rauber et al., 2018; Julia et al., 2018; Cediel et al., 2018; Latasa et al., 2017; Louzada et al., 2015a, Louzada et al., 2015b, Louzada et al., 2018; Monteiro et al., 2010) have shown that high dietary contribution of UPF renders nutritionally unbalanced diets. Large, population-based cross-sectional and cohort studies support that the consumption of these foods is associated with overweight and obesity (Julia et al., 2018; Juul et al., 2018; Mendonça et al., 2016; Louzada et al., 2015; Canella et al., 2014), dyslipidemia (Rauber et al., 2015), hypertension (Mendonça et al., 2017) and abdominal obesity (Juul et al., 2018). Two small cross-sectional studies found an association between UPF consumption and MetS in Brazilian adolescents (Tavares et al., 2012) and among Indigenous Cree (Eeyouch) from northern Québec (Lavigne-Robichaud et al., 2018).

The aim of the current study was to examine whether a relationship exists between the dietary share of UPF and MetS among a representative sample of US adults.

Section snippets

Data source, population and sampling

We used nationally representative data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, n.d.) 2009–2014 (three 2-year cycles). NHANES is a continuous, nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the non-institutionalized, civilian US residents conducted by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Johnson et al., n.d.). Participants were recruited using a four-stage sample design based on the selection of counties, blocks, households, and the number of people within

UPF consumption and prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to sociodemographic and life-style variables

Among US adults aged 20 years or above who met the eligibility criteria (n = 6385), the mean dietary contribution of UPF was 55.5% (95% CI 54.6, 56.4) of total energy intake and decreased with age (p for linear trend<0.001) (Table 3). UPF consumption was lowest among Other Hispanic and Other race, intermediate among Mexican American, and highest among Non-Hispanic White and Black (p < 0.05). Individuals with income-to-poverty ratio < 3.5 and 12 years of education presented the highest UPF

Discussion

Findings from this nationally representative study of US adults show that higher dietary contribution of UPF is associated with higher prevalence of MetS. The association was especially strong among young adults (between 20 and 39 years) and grew weaker with age.

A positive association between UPF consumption and MetS has been reported in small studies carried out in Brazil (Tavares et al., 2012) and Canada (Lavigne-Robichaud et al., 2018). Our results are also consistent with evidence linking

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Author contributions

EMS and CAM conceived and designed the study including statistical analysis; EMS performed the statistical analyses; EMS and CAM analyzed and interpreted the data; EMS took the lead in writing the manuscript; FJ, FR, DN and CAM revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript and take full responsibility for the final content.

Funding

This work was supported by the CNPq [Processo CNPq n° 150888/2017-1] and the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [Processo 2018/17972-9; 2016/25853-4; 2016/14302-7; 2015/14900-9].

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References (72)

  • F. Rauber et al.

    Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children's lipid profiles: a longitudinal study

    Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.

    (2015)
  • A.J. Schuit et al.

    Clustering of lifestyle risk factors in a general adult population

    Prev. Med.

    (2002)
  • M.M. Slining et al.

    An approach to monitor food and nutrition from “factory to fork”

    J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.

    (2015)
  • V. Adamsson et al.

    What is a healthy Nordic diet? Foods and nutrients in the NORDIET study

    Food Nutr. Res.

    (2012)
  • A. Agodi et al.

    Association of dietary patterns with metabolic syndrome: results from the Kardiovize Brno 2030 study

    Nutrients

    (2018)
  • Automated Multiple-Pass Method. United States Department of Agriculture

  • M. Aguilar et al.

    Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012

    JAMA

    (2015)
  • K.G. Alberti et al.

    Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity

    Circulation

    (2009)
  • L. Azadbakht et al.

    Beneficial effects of a dietary approaches to stop hypertension eating plan on features of the metabolic syndrome

    Diabetes Care

    (2005)
  • N. Babio et al.

    Mediterranean diets and metabolic syndrome status in the PREDIMED randomized trial

    CMAJ

    (2014)
  • A.J. Barros et al.

    Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

    BMC Med. Res. Methodol.

    (2003)
  • S. Bingham et al.

    Epidemiologic assessment of sugars consumption using biomarkers: comparisons of obese and non-obese individuals in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer Norfolk

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.

    (2007)
  • C.L. Boulange et al.

    Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease

    Genome Med.

    (2016)
  • S.A. Bowman et al.

    Food patterns equivalents database 2009–10; 2011-2012; 2013-2014: methodology and user guide [online]. Food surveys research group, beltsville human nutrition research center, agricultural research service

  • D.S. Canella et al.

    Ultra-processed food products and obesity in Brazilian households (2008-2009)

    PLoS One

    (2014 Mar 25)
  • G. Cediel et al.

    Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010)

    Public Health Nutr.

    (2018)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition...
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition...
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition...
  • L. Djousse et al.

    Diet and metabolic syndrome

    Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets

    (2010)
  • A. Fardet

    Minimally processed foods are more satiating and less hyperglycemic than ultra-processed foods: a preliminary study with 98 ready-to-eat foods

    Food Funct.

    (2016)
  • Gouveri E, and Diamantopoulos EJ. The Mediterranean diet and metabolic syndrome (chapter 29) in The Mediterranean Diet....
  • C. Heidemann et al.

    Dietary patterns are associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in a representative study population of German adults

    Br. J. Nutr.

    (2011)
  • Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III)

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • Johnson CL, Paulose-Ram R, Ogden CL, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Analytic Guidelines,...
  • C. Julia et al.

    Contribution of ultra-processed foods in the diet of adults from the French NutriNet-Santé study

    Public Health Nutr.

    (2018 Jan)
  • Cited by (134)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text