Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 38, Issue 6, June 2004, Pages 857-864
Preventive Medicine

BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Recommended levels of youth physical activity (PA) should emerge from data related to important health outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to establish criterion-referenced standards for PA (using pedometer-assessed steps/day) related to healthy body composition.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an existing data set (including pedometer-assessed PA and objectively measured BMI) of 1,954 children (995 girls, 959 boys; ages 6–12 years) from the USA, Australia, and Sweden. The contrasting groups method [M.J. Sarif, Introduction to Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, St. Louis, MO: Mosby College Publishing; 1986] for establishing criterion-referenced cut points was used to identify optimal age- and sex-specific standards for steps/day related to international BMI cut points for normal weight and overweight/obesity.

Results: The selected cut points for steps/day for 6–12 year olds were 12,000 steps/day for girls and 15,000 steps/day for boys.

Conclusions: The analytical process undertaken in this study illuminated the difference in previously used norm-referenced standards vs. criterion-referenced standards based on BMI categories. The steps/day cut points established herein, using an international sample, are higher than previously suggested normative standards but are not inconsistent with recent advances in our understanding of PA needs in youth. This analysis provides the foundation for cross-validation and evaluation of these BMI-referenced steps/day cut points in independent samples and with longitudinal study designs.

Introduction

The worldwide obesity epidemic includes a trend towards increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth [1], [2]. Although obesity is emerging as a problem in developing countries [3], [4] as well, the very high and increasing prevalence (regardless of specific standards used to define overweight/obesity) reported in developed countries is cause for more immediate concern. For example, in the USA, direct measures of body mass and height obtained through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) indicate that ≈ 15% of 6–19 year olds were classified as overweight (95th percentile of age- and sex-specific body mass index derived from five previous NHANES surveys) in 1999–2000, up ≈ 5% from 1988 to 1994 [5]. Using the 85th percentile (as a cut point for overweight) and the 95th percentile (as a cut point for obesity) derived from international standards [6], 19–23% of Australian children and adolescents were overweight or obese [7]. Using the 91st and 98th percentiles of body mass reference curves for the UK [8] to, respectively, define overweight and obesity from self-reported height and weight, ≈ 11% of Swedish boys and ≈ 5% of Swedish girls ages 12, 15, and 18 years were overweight; the corresponding values for obesity were ≈ 8% and ≈ 4% [9].

A potential contributor to this epidemic is a shift towards ever-diminishing physical activity behaviors [10]. For example, only 21–22% of American youth participate in physical education classes [11], [12] and a 1993 report suggests that fifth grade children are moderately or vigorously active less than 9% of actual class time [13]. Transportation surveys in the US indicate an increase in the use of motorized vehicles, including for purposes of chauffeuring children [14] and the number of trips made by children by foot or by bicycle has declined 37% between 1977 and 1995 [15]. In fact, ≈ 50% of 5- to 15-year-old American school children are driven to school in privately owned motor vehicles compared to only ≈ 10% who walk [16]. Most recently, a report of school transportation modes in a Southern US state indicates that almost 42% of children living ≤ 1 mile from school are usually driven there in a private motor vehicle [17]. Finally, 65–67% of 8- to 16-year-old American youth watch television ≥2 h/day [18], [19]. Such elevated levels of television viewing have been related to youth overweight and obesity [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].

In 1996, the US Surgeon General [23] endorsed public health recommendations [24] that all individuals over the age of 2 years accumulate 30 min or more of at least moderate intensity activity, on most, if not all, days of the week. Similar recommendations were made specifically for adolescents [25]. Accumulating evidence suggests that most young people meet these recommendations, however, leading to questions about their appropriateness [26]. Since that time, researchers have proposed that the recommendations be modified to higher levels of duration [26] and/or intensity [27] for optimal functioning. In 1998, a convened symposium in the UK recommended that all young people should engage in physical activity of at least moderate intensity for 1 h per day [28]. Guidelines established by the National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NAPSE) in 1993 [29] agreed that elementary school children should be active for at least 30–60 min daily and the most recent revision of that document suggests the accumulation of at least 60 min and up to several hours of moderate to vigorous physical activity daily [30]. A recent report from the Institute of Medicine reinforces this higher recommendation (i.e., at least 1 h daily) for both adults and children [31] if body fat maintenance is the objective.

Setting appropriate benchmarks or cut points for health-related physical activity is hampered by imperfect assessment of this behavior. Most of the data previously collected has been based on self-reported surveys, the limitations of which are well-known [32], especially for younger children [33]. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in objective monitoring of daily physical activity using simple and inexpensive pedometers [34], [35], [36]. Pedometers are small, light-weight, unobtrusive instruments that have been accepted by researchers as practical physical activity assessment tools that are particularly sensitive to ambulatory activities [37], [38], [39]. Accumulated evidence indicates that pedometers are acceptably agreeable compared to accelerometers, direct observation, measures of energy expenditure, and self-report [40]. Correct interpretation of steps/day in relation to desired health outcomes demands the development of appropriate and pedometer-specific cut points. Although 10,000 steps/day appears to be readily accepted by the media [41], [42], [43], [44] and can be traced to Japanese health promotion efforts [45], emerging data on children indicate that this value is likely too low to elicit substantial health benefits in this population segment. Limited evidence shows that 8- to 10-year-old UK children take 12,000–16,000 steps/day (lower for girls than boys) [46]. The 2001–2002 President's Challenge Physical Activity and Fitness Awards Program [47] also recognized that the popular 10,000 steps/day cut point was likely too low for children by recommending instead that children accumulate 11,000 steps (for girls) to 13,000 steps (for boys) at least 5 days a week for a standard healthy base. These recommendations were based on norm-referenced standards determined from a US sample [48]; the validity of even this level of steps/day to prevent or decrease overweight and obesity in youth is unknown.

In an attempt to answer, “How many steps are enough?”, we can turn to experts who advocate the use of appropriate statistical techniques for establishing criterion-referenced performance standards on physical fitness tests [49], [50], [51], [52]. Criterion-referenced standards are set based on their likelihood to elicit a specific benefit [53], and are therefore preferable to norm-referenced standards. Simply put, recommended levels of steps/day should emerge from data related to important health outcomes (in this case BMI, an accepted indicator of relative obesity). Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to establish preliminary criterion-referenced standards for physical activity using pedometer-assessed steps/day related to healthy body composition in youth as indicated by international cut points for BMI [6].

Section snippets

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of an existing data set of 1954 children (995 girls, 959 boys; ages 6–12 years) from the USA, Australia, and Sweden. Recruitment and data collection methods have been described previously in detail [54] and are summarized again here. The previous paper focused on between-country differences in steps/day and BMI. The statistical analysis undertaken herein has not been performed previously and is therefore novel.

Results

Mean ± SD steps/day are presented in Table 1 for each sex and age group, stratified for weight status as either normal weight or overweight/obese. The t test results were consistently significant for all sex and age strata with only two exceptions (6- and 7-year-old girls). In both these cases, the number of subjects was small compared to other strata.

A summary of the analytical steps (i.e., probability of correct decisions, misclassification of errors, validity coefficient, utility analysis)

Discussion

In this secondary analysis of an existing international database, we used accepted analytical procedures to establish BMI-referenced standards for pedometer-determined physical activity in youth. Such cut points are necessary to guide surveillance, intervention, and evaluation. For example, the proportion of youth meeting or falling short of set cut points can be reported, cut points can be used as behavior change goals during intervention, and they can be consulted when evaluating the impact

References (74)

  • A.R.P Walker et al.

    Rises in schoolchildren's anthropometry: what do they signify in developed and developing populations?

    J.R. Soc. Health

    (1998)
  • P Gordon-Larsen et al.

    Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns

    Pediatrics

    (2000)
  • R Lowry et al.

    Recent trends in participation in physical education among US high school students

    J. Sch. Health

    (2001)
  • B.G Simons-Morton et al.

    The physical activity of fifth-grade students during physical education classes

    Am. J. Public Health

    (1993)
  • B McCann et al.

    Mean streets 2000: pedestrian safety, health and federal transportation spending

    (2000)
  • Federal Highway Administration. Our Nation's Travel: 1995 NPTS Early Results Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of...
  • CDC

    School transportation modes—Georgia, 2000

    MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.

    (2002)
  • R.E Anderson et al.

    Relationship of physical activity and television watching with body weight and level of fatness among children: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • J.C Eisenmann et al.

    Physical activity, TV viewing, and weight in U.S. youth: 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey

    Obes. Res.

    (2002)
  • M Dowda et al.

    Environmental influences, physical activity, and weight status in 8- to 16-year-olds

    Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.

    (2001)
  • C.J Crespo et al.

    Television watching, energy intake, and obesity in US children: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994

    Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.

    (2001)
  • B Hernandez et al.

    Association of obesity with physical activity, television programs and other forms of video viewing among children in Mexico city

    Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord.

    (1999)
  • US Surgeon General

    Surgeon General's report on physical activity and health. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • R.R Pate et al.

    Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • J.F Sallis et al.

    Physical activity guidelines for adolescents: consensus statement

    Pediatr. Exerc. Sci.

    (1994)
  • R Pate et al.

    Critique of existing guidelines for physical activity in young people

  • C.B Corbin et al.

    Toward understanding of appropriate physical activity levels for youth. President's Council of Physical Activity and Sport

    Phys. Act. Fit. Res. Digest.

    (1994)
  • S Biddle et al.

    Policy framework for young people and health-enhancing physical activity

  • National Association of Physical Education and Sports

    Physical activity for children: a statement of guidelines

    (1993)
  • National Association of Physical Education and Sports

    Guidelines for appropriate physical activity for elementary school children: update 2003

    (2003)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, protein and amino acids (macronutrients)

    (2002 (September 05))
  • J.F Sallis et al.

    Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions

    Res. Q Exerc. Sport

    (2000)
  • J.R Sirard et al.

    Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents

    Sports Med.

    (2001)
  • C Tudor-Locke et al.

    Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity

    Res. Q Exerc. Sport

    (2001)
  • C Tudor-Locke et al.

    Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults

    Sports Med.

    (2001)
  • A.V Rowlands et al.

    Measurement of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of heart rate and pedometry

    Sports Med.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text