Urotherapy in children: Quantitative measurements of daytime urinary incontinence before and after treatment: According to the new definitions of the International Children’s Continence Society

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.03.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of urotherapy in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction, according to the new definitions of the International Children’s Continence Society.

Material and methods

We performed a retrospective review of 122 children (aged 8.8 ± 2.0 years) treated in an outpatient program for lower urinary tract dysfunction. Exclusion criteria included all neurologic abnormalities. In 98 children (80%) daytime urinary incontinence was a predominant symptom. Therapy consisted of an individually adapted drinking and voiding schedule, pelvic floor relaxation, instructions on toilet behavior, biofeedback uroflowmetry and if necessary recommendations for regulation of defecation. Before and at the end of training, patients were evaluated for number and severity of daytime wet accidents per week, using a scoring system to grade the severity of incontinence. Secondary measurements of accompanying voiding symptoms were performed.

Results

Of the 90 children with daytime urinary incontinence for whom sufficient objective data were collected, 42% became completely dry during the daytime and 36% showed a 50% or greater level of response. Secondary measurements showed a significant reduction in daily voiding frequency (mean 7.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.0001) and mean post-void residual (P < 0.003), and an improvement in flow pattern (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Urotherapy is successful for the treatment of daytime urinary incontinence in children. Additional benefit was evident in improvement of accompanying voiding symptoms. A combination of the definitions of the International Children’s Continence Society and a scoring system to grade severity improved the evaluation method. Further research into long-term efficacy will be performed.

Introduction

Toilet training is not automatic for every child. Up to 10% of 5–6 year olds experience daytime urinary incontinence. The prevalence decreases with increasing age to 4% in 12–18 year olds [1]. Daytime urinary incontinence can cause major stress in school-age children and can have a negative impact upon a child’s self-esteem [2]. It is desirable to identify and take care of children with daytime urinary incontinence as early as possible.

Since 1996, children in our clinic have been treated with urotherapy according to a special outpatient clinic protocol [3]. This protocol is the result of a multidisciplinary collaboration between the departments of pediatric urology, pediatric physiotherapy and medical psychology. At first, children were treated intuitively and without any protocol. Later on, some fundamental principles of other protocols were enrolled [4]. The resulting therapy is based on the remedy of daytime urinary incontinence, regulation of fluid intake and voiding frequency, increase of maximum voided volume once a normal voiding pattern has been obtained, and treatment of constipation if necessary. Alongside this training setting run by nurse specialists, there is easy access to and cooperation with pediatric physiotherapy and medical psychology. In our practice, urotherapy is reserved for children with functional voiding symptoms; namely, persistent daytime urinary incontinence, urgency and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), despite adequate conservative management, pharmacotherapy and/or surgical interventions.

Different terms are used in the literature, such as bladder training, pelvic floor therapy, urotherapy, behavioral therapy and bladder rehabilitation [4], [5], [6], [7], for non-invasive training programs treating children with lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction. The aim of these interventions is to teach children to perform regular, complete emptying of the urinary bladder, and this can be considered as a systematic learning process in which physical reactions are brought under conscious control [8]. No controlled clinical trials have been conducted to study quantitatively the effectiveness of these approaches.

Retrospective studies have indicated improvement in daytime wetting symptoms in 75%–90% of children with complete dryness rates of 51%–82% [5], [6], [9], [10]. Because of the use of differing terminology, definitions, and methods of urotherapy, from outpatient training to an intensive inpatient 10-day course, is it difficult to compare current studies.

In 2006, the International Children’s Continence Society (ICCS) published a report with new definitions and a standardized terminology. Its main use will be in a research setting, where adherence to the same terminology will make it easier to compare studies and decrease confusion among researchers. There is also a lack of consensus among experts on the definition of successful treatment for LUT dysfunction; therefore, the ICCS made some recommendations regarding urotherapy [11].

In accordance with the new definitions of the ICCS, we decided to assess retrospectively the effectiveness of urotherapy in children with LUT dysfunction treated in our hospital using an outpatient clinic protocol, and to add a scoring system to grade the severity.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Definitions used within this study conform to the standards recommended by the ICCS [11] except where specifically noted.

A retrospective study was accomplished of a group of 122 children who participated in the training program between April 1999 and June 2008. The group consisted of 49 boys and 73 girls varying in age between 5 and 14 years (8.8 ± 2.0). All children were referred to the pediatric urologist with a longer period of existing complaints of the LUT. Table 1 shows the inclusion

Results

Of the 122 children included in our study, daytime urinary incontinence was in 98 (80%) a predominant symptom. Of these 98 children, 72 (75%) also had nocturnal enuresis. Of the remaining 24 children, 14 had nocturnal enuresis only and 10 children were continent. Fifty-five children (45%) had a prior history of recurrent UTIs. In 32% signs of constipation were evident. Urodynamic studies showed that detrusor overactivity during filling was the most common filling-phase dysfunction (35%). A

Discussion

Urotherapy is an important tool in the treatment of idiopathic LUT dysfunction in children. Our study indicates improvement in daytime urinary incontinence in 78% of the children at the end of the training, with a complete dryness rate of 42%. Many previous studies suggest that urotherapy is useful in the treatment of LUT dysfunction [5], [6], [10], [12], [13], [14] and the present study supports this.

In our study we used the terminology of the ICCS [11] to make it easier to compare future

Conclusion

Urotherapy was shown to be successful for the treatment of daytime urinary incontinence in up to 78% of children. The majority of patients experienced an improvement of symptoms. Additional benefit was evident in the improvement of other voiding symptoms such as voiding frequency, flow pattern and PVR urine volume. Combined use of the definitions of the ICCS and a scoring system to grade the severity of incontinence may improve evaluation methods and enable comparison between future studies.

Conflict of interest/funding

None.

Cited by (41)

  • Long-term functional and psychosocial outcome in adolescents and young adults treated for lower urinary tract dysfunction in childhood

    2021, Journal of Pediatric Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Urodynamic studies were done if indicated. Since 1996, two trained nurse specialists have provided treatment in our clinic according to an outpatient clinical protocol in line with current standardized documents [13,14]. Since ICCS's definitions were first published in 2006, retrospective chart analyses was performed to determine the type of LUTD of all former patients, including those treated before 2006.

  • Bladder Training Video versus Standard Urotherapy for Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction: A Noninferiority Randomized, Controlled Trial

    2017, Journal of Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although evidence has shown that SU delivered through direct, 1-on-1 contact between the clinician and the child/family represents an effective way of managing BBD symptoms regardless of the delivery mode,10 the optimal followup to determine success after urotherapy is still debatable, ranging from 3 to 12 months.8,18 We have found that although mean symptomology scores in our patients significantly improved at the last followup visit, they remained greater than 11, indicating ongoing BBD as reported by others.8,18–20 Our relatively short followup of 3 months may not have been long enough to allow for definitive implementation of behavioral strategies, long-lasting management of constipation or a full benefit from pharmacological therapy when required.

  • Postvoidal residual urine is the most significant non-invasive diagnostic test to predict the treatment outcome in children with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction

    2016, Journal of Pediatric Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In their retrospective series of 122 patients, Mulders et al. grouped their patients as 5–8 years and 9–16 years of age. Their results showed similar response rates; however, the full response rate was significantly higher in the older patient group [13]. This could be attributed to better compliance to treatment in older children.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text