Original Article
Responses of Obese and Lean Girls Exercising under Heat and Thermoneutral Conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.047Get rights and content

Objective

To compare thermoregulatory and perceptual responses between lean and obese girls during and after exercise under heat (HC) and thermoneutral (TC) conditions.

Study design

In a randomized order, 27 girls (14 lean [16.6 ± 6.7% fat and 9.1 ± 1.3 years] and 13 obese [41.3 ± 6.7% fat and 9.4 ± 1.1 years]) cycled 30 minutes at ∼55% peak oxygen uptake in 2 sessions, which only differed in the thermal conditions (35°C and 40% relative humidity vs 24°C and 50% relative humidity).

Results

Initial rectal temperature (Tre) was higher in obese versus lean during HC (37.5 ± 0.3°C vs 37.3 ± 0.3°C, P = .03) and TC (37.6 ± 0.3°C vs 37.3 ± 0.2°C; P = .03) sessions. During cycling, Tre remained higher in the obese, but the rate of increase was greater in the lean. This change occurred mainly in the HC, when final Tre of the lean surpassed that of the obese (37.8 ± 0.2 vs 38.0 ± 0.2°C, P = .04). Sweat volume (in mL.m−2) was similar between lean and obese in the HC (167 ± 119 and 120 ± 145) and TC (200 ± 196 vs 72 ± 20). Heart rate, rate of perceived exertion, and thermal sensation were similar between groups, independent of the thermal condition. Cycling in HC produced decreased thermal comfort (P = .009) and increased irritation (P = .02) within the lean girls.

Conclusion

Thermoregulatory and perceptual responses of prepubescent obese girls during 30 minutes of cycling at a similar relative intensity do not seem to be impaired when comparing with a lean group either in TC or HC.

Section snippets

Methods

A total of 27 prepubertal girls (14 lean and 13 obese) between 7 and 11 years of age participated in this study. Sample size was calculated with statistical power at 95% and level of significance at 5% (PEPI 4.0, Abramson JH, Gahlinger PM; Sagebrush: Salt Lake City, Utah) based on Tre from studies with obese and nonobese boys2, 5 and resulting in 12 participants per group. The body fat obtained from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (Lunar GE Pencil Bin, SmartScan pediatric program, v. 4.7c; GE

Results

Initially, 44 girls were recruited, of whom 10 were excluded (9 had already reached puberty, 1 did not satisfy the criterion for obesity), 7 left the study (5 left after the preliminary assessment, and 2 left after the first experimental session) and 27 girls completed the study.

Groups arrived to both HC and TC sessions with similar hydration levels as observed from urine measures. In the HC, respective urine color and USG were 3.0 ± 1.6 and 1.016 ± 0.07 for the lean group, and 3.4 ± 1.3 and

Discussion

Although all girls of the present study were tested in the morning and were allowed to rest for 5 minutes before assessing Tre inside the environmental chamber, obese girls started at a Tre 0.2°C and 0.3°C (P = .03) higher in the HC and TC, respectively. In boys, a higher gastric temperature before exercise was also found in obese compared with their lean peers, whether they were heat-acclimated4 or not.3 It is intriguing why obese children presented a higher Tre and Tgastric at rest prior to

References (29)

  • E. Arens et al.

    Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort. Part I: uniform environmental conditions

    J Therm Biol

    (2006)
  • D.M. Savastano et al.

    Adiposity and human regional body temperature

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2009)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics

    Policy statement. Climatic heat stress and exercising children and adolescents

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
  • E.M. Haymes et al.

    Heat tolerance of exercising lean and heavy prepubertal girls

    J Appl Physiol

    (1974)
  • K.A. Dougherty et al.

    Responses of lean and obese boys to repeated summer exercise in the heat bouts

    Med Sci Sport Exerc

    (2009)
  • K.A. Dougherty et al.

    Critical environmental limits for exercising heat-acclimated lean and obese boys

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2010)
  • P.L. Sehl et al.

    Responses of obese and non-obese boys cycling in the heat

    Int J Sports Med

    (2012)
  • E.M. Haymes et al.

    Heat tolerance of exercising lean and heavy prepubertal boys

    J Appl Physiol

    (1975)
  • T.G. Lohman et al.

    Body fat measurement goes high-tech: not all are created equal

    ACSM Health Fitness J

    (1997)
  • P.R. Crocker et al.

    Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children

    Med Sci Sport Exer

    (1997)
  • J.M. Tanner

    Growth at adolescence

    (1962)
  • D. Dubois et al.

    Clinical calorimetry: a formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known

    Arch Int Med

    (1916)
  • O. Bar-Or et al.

    Pediatric exercise medicine. From physiologic principles to health-care application

    (2004)
  • G. Cunha et al.

    Effect of biological maturation on maximal oxygen uptake and ventilatory thresholds in soccer players: an allometric approach

    J Sports Sci

    (2011)
  • Cited by (31)

    • The impact of body fat on thermoregulation during exercise in the heat: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2021, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      Laboratory investigations have examined the effect of body fat on thermoregulation during exercise in the heat, but these studies are limited in number with small sample sizes with conflicting conclusions.5,9,13,14 Some studies reported significant differences in Tcore and Tsk between high-body fat (Hi-BF) and low-body fat (Lo-BF)15–17 where others suggest that there are no differences in any thermoregulatory outcome.18–21 Moreover, individuals with higher body fat tend to have lower fitness levels, greater body mass and a smaller body surface area to mass ratio compared to those with lower body fat, which makes it difficult to ascertain the independent influence of body fat on thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat.12

    • Revisiting individual and group differences in thermal comfort based on ASHRAE database

      2020, Energy and Buildings
      Citation Excerpt :

      Wang et al.’s review [29] found there is no consistent conclusion on whether the age has statistically significant influence on thermal comfort. Other factors have been studied in previous studies include economic conditions [28], thermal history [30], physical disabilities [31], fitness [32,33], and climate zone and country [34]. However, a major constraint of existing studies is each study focus on only one or a few influential factors.

    • The Squeaky wheel: Machine learning for anomaly detection in subjective thermal comfort votes

      2019, Building and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is generally acknowledged, however, that physical measurements alone may not reliably determine or predict occupants' thermal comfort due to the significant inter-individual differences in preference [11]. These differences have been observed across gender [12], age [13], physical fitness [14], and activity levels [15], and are partly influenced by clothing decisions (or corporate dress codes), basal metabolic rates, and a person's unique experience and perception of their thermal environment. These types of effects can result in some people feeling comfortable in the same ambient conditions while others expressing dissatisfaction with the environment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    View full text