Asthma and lower airway disease
Childhood asthma clusters and response to therapy in clinical trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.002Get rights and content

Background

Childhood asthma clusters, or subclasses, have been developed by computational methods without evaluation of clinical utility.

Objective

To replicate and determine whether childhood asthma clusters previously identified computationally in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) are associated with treatment responses in Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network clinical trials.

Methods

A cluster assignment model was determined by using SARP participant data. A total of 611 participants 6 to 18 years old from 3 CARE trials were assigned to SARP pediatric clusters. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by cluster in each trial.

Results

CARE participants were assigned to SARP clusters with high accuracy. Baseline characteristics were similar between SARP and CARE children of the same cluster. Treatment response in CARE trials was generally similar across clusters. However, with the caveat of a smaller sample size, children in the early-onset/severe-lung function cluster had best response with fluticasone/salmeterol (64% vs 23% 2.5× fluticasone and 13% fluticasone/montelukast in the Best ADd-on Therapy Giving Effective Responses trial; P = .011) and children in the early-onset/comorbidity cluster had the least clinical efficacy to treatments (eg, −0.076% change in FEV1 in the Characterizing Response to Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist and Inhaled Corticosteroid trial).

Conclusions

In this study, we replicated SARP pediatric asthma clusters by using a separate, large clinical trials network. Early-onset/severe-lung function and early-onset/comorbidity clusters were associated with differential and limited response to therapy, respectively. Further prospective study of therapeutic response by cluster could provide new insights into childhood asthma treatment.

Section snippets

Methods

The study population consisted of 6- to 18-year-old children with asthma (N = 611) enrolled in 3 CARE Network clinical trials.15, 16, 17 The trials are summarized in Table I. Briefly, the Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial (PACT)16 was a 3-arm (1× fluticasone, 0.5× fluticasone plus salmeterol, or montelukast) double-blind study of children with mild-moderate asthma and used percentage of asthma control days as the primary outcome. The Characterizing Response to Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist

Classification model and assignment

For early-onset/normal-lung, late-onset/normal-lung, early-onset/comorbidity, and early-onset/severe-lung clusters, cross-validated QDA recall using SARP data with FEV1 and asthma duration was 96%, 94%, 97%, and 90%, while precision was 96%, 94%, 94%, and 93%, respectively (see Table E1 in this article’s Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). Using SARP data with the same 2 variables, cross-validation LDA recall was 90%, 96%, 94%, and 90% and precision was 98%, 89%, 94%, and 90%,

Discussion

In this study, we replicated SARP pediatric asthma clusters by demonstrating that CARE Network participants assigned to SARP clusters had similar characteristics. Furthermore, overall patterns of treatment response in the PACT, the CLIC trial, and the BADGER trial were similar across clusters when compared with responses in entire study populations. Interestingly, however, the early-onset/severe-lung cluster clearly had a best step 3 response with fluticasone/salmeterol in the BADGER trial,

References (25)

  • A. Durham et al.

    Steroid resistance in severe asthma: current mechanisms and future treatment

    Curr Pharm Des

    (2011)
  • T. Sekigawa et al.

    Gene-expression profiles in human nasal polyp tissues and identification of genetic susceptibility in aspirin-intolerant asthma

    Clin Exp Allergy

    (2009)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Diagnosing, Monitoring and Treating Asthma

      2021, Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine, Second Edition
    • T2-“Low” Asthma: Overview and Management Strategies

      2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
    • Asthma-COPD Overlap and Chronic Airflow Obstruction: Definitions, Management, and Unanswered Questions

      2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data on the effect of FAO on the frequency of acute exacerbations are conflicting.5,14,16 Asthmatic patients with FAO may also respond differently to inhaled medications.17,18 Multiple reports have shown that asthmatic patients with FAO are prescribed higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids and use reliever medications more frequently17-19; this may reflect greater steroid resistance, or the prescribing habits of physicians attempting to normalize lung function by escalating steroid doses.

    • It's Time to Start Phenotyping Our Patients with Asthma

      2019, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      This finding led to several studies that examined children with asthma and attempted to better define underlying phenotypes (Table 1). Similar to the adult studies, children were grouped into clusters with phenotypic characteristics focused primarily on atopy, airway physiology, symptom onset, and asthma symptom days and exacerbations.15–18 In a study by Fitzpatrick and colleagues,15 cluster analysis similar to that used in the adult Severe Asthma Research Program identified four clusters of patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR000427 and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Fellowship F30HL112491. The study was also supported by grants (5U10HL064287, 5U10HL064288, 5U10HL064295, 5U10HL064307, 5U10HL064305, and 5U10HL064313) from the NHLBI; a grant (5UL1RR02499204) from the Washington University School of Medicine CTSA Infrastructure for Pediatric Research; a grant (1UL1RR025011) from the Madison CTSA; a grant (UL1RR025780) to the Colorado CTSA from the National Center for Research Resources; and grants to the General Clinical Research Centers at Washington University School of Medicine (M01 RR00036), National Jewish Health (M01 RR00051), and the University of New Mexico (5M01 RR00997).

    Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: T. S. Chang has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Center for Research Resources, NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and NIH/Medical Scientist Training Program. R. F. Lemanske, Jr has received research support, travel support, and fees for participation in review activities from the NIH; has received consultancy fees from Merck, Sepracor, SA Boney and Associates Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), American Institute of Research, Genentech, Inc, Double Helix Development, Inc, and Boehringer Ingelheim; is employed by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; has received research support from the NHLBI and Pharmaxis; has received lecture fees from Michigan Public Health Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, the American Academy of Pediatrics, West Allegheny Health Systems, California Chapter 4 AAP, the Colorado Allergy Society, Pennsylvania Allergy and Asthma Association, Harvard Pilgrim Health, California Society of Allergy, the NYC Allergy Society, the World Allergy Organization, the American College of Chest Physicians, Asia Pacific Association of Pediatric Allergy, Respirology and Immunology, and the Western Society of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology; has received payment for manuscript preparation from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); and receives royalties from Elsevier and UpToDate. D. T. Mauger has received research support from the NIH/NHLBI; has received provision of a study drug from GSK and Merck; and has received consultancy fees from GSK, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Biocryst. A. M. Fitzpatrick has received consultancy fees from MedImmune, Inc, Consulting, Merck Scientific Advisory Board, GSK Scientific Advisory Board, and Genentech Consulting. C. A. Sorkness has received research support from the NHLBI Care Network. S. J. Szefler has received research support, travel support, fees for participation in review activities, and payment for writing/reviewing the manuscript from the NHLBI; has received consultancy fees from Merck, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, and GSK; has received research support from GSK; has received lecture fees from Merck; has received payment for manuscript preparation from Genentech; and has a previously submitted patent with the NHLBI. C. D. Page has received research support from the NIH and has received consultancy fees from MedSeek. D. J. Jackson has received research support from the NIH and Pharmaxis and has received consultancy fees from Gilead and GSK. R. E. Gangnon declares that he has no relevant conflicts of interest.

    View full text