Guideline

The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with diarrhea

La colitis eosinofílica primaria (CEoP) es una enfermedad inflamatoria causada por infiltración de eosinófilos en la mucosa del colon, sin otras posibles causas identificadas, que se caracteriza por dolor abdominal y diarrea. Su prevalencia se desconoce.

Conocer la prevalencia de CEoP en pacientes con diarrea crónica y en aquellos con criterios clínicos del síndrome del intestino irritable con predominio de diarrea (SII-D).

Todos los pacientes con diarrea crónica no inflamatoria, atendidos en forma consecutiva durante una década, fueron estudiados mediante colonoscopia con toma sistemática de biopsias. Se excluyeron aquellos con enfermedad orgánica conocida o descompensada, con datos de alarma, estudios de investigación limitada anormales y factores asociados a eosinofilia. Del grupo general, se seleccionaron aquellos con criterios clínicos de SII-D (Roma III). Colitis eosinofílica se definió como la presencia de > 35 eosinófilos/100 células epiteliales por campo en cualquiera de los segmentos.

Fueron atendidos 683 pacientes. Se incluyeron 545 enfermos (361 mujeres), entre quienes se detectaron 22 casos de CEoP, para una prevalencia del 4.0%. Trescientos cuarenta y tres sujetos tenían criterios de SII-D (223 mujeres), entre los que se detectaron 16 casos de CEoP, para una prevalencia del 4.7%. La colonoscopia fue normal o casi normal en todos los casos detectados.

La prevalencia de CEoP fue del 4.0% de los enfermos con diarrea crónica y del 4.7% en aquellos con SII-D. La eosinofilia periférica parece ser la principal característica clínica distintiva, pero la toma sistemática de biopsias es indispensable para establecer el diagnóstico.

Primary eosinophilic colitis (PEC) is an inflammatory disease caused by the infiltration of eosinophils into the mucosa of the colon, determined after having ruled out other possible causes. It is characterized by abdominal pain and diarrhea and its prevalence is unknown.

To know the prevalence of PEC in patients with chronic diarrhea and in those with clinical criteria for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).

All patients with chronic noninflammatory diarrhea that were consecutively seen over a decade were studied through colonoscopy, with systematic biopsy. Patients with a known or decompensated organic disease, alarm features, abnormal minimal laboratory test results, and factors associated with eosinophilia were excluded. Patients with the clinical criteria for IBS-D (Rome III) were selected from the general group. Eosinophilic colitis was defined as the presence of > 35 eosinophils/100 epithelial cells per field in any of the segments.

From the 683 patients seen, a total of 545 patients (361 women) were included in the study. Twenty-two cases of PEC were detected, resulting in a prevalence of 4.0%. A total of 343 patients had IBS-D criteria (223 women), with 16 cases of PEC detected, for a prevalence of 4.7%. Colonoscopy was normal, or almost normal, in all the PEC cases detected.

The prevalence of PEC was 4.0% in the patients with chronic diarrhea and 4.7% in the patients with IBS-D. Peripheral eosinophilia appeared to be the main distinctive clinical characteristic, but systematic biopsy was essential for making the diagnosis.

Microscopic colitis (MC) is the most frequent condition in subjects undergoing ileocolonoscopy for chronic non-bloody diarrhea (CNBD) in Western countries. Emerging evidence has shown a negative association between MC and colorectal cancer. Within this prospective multi-center study we have evaluated the risk of colorectal neoplasia in MC and non-MC patients with CNBD receiving ileocolonoscopy with high-definition plus virtual chromoendoscopic imaging and histopathological assessment.

Patients with CNBD of unknown origin were prospectively enrolled in 5 referral centers in Northern Italy for ileocolonoscopy with high-definition and digital/optical chromoendoscopy plus multiple biopsies in each segment. The prevalence of colorectal neoplasia (cancer, adenoma, serrated lesion) in MC was compared to that observed in a control group including CNBD patients negative for MC, inflammatory bowel disease or eosinophilic colitis.

From 2014 and 2017, 546 consecutive CNBD patients were recruited. Among the 492 patients (mean age 53±18 years) fulfilling the inclusion criteria against the exclusion critieria, MC was the predominant diagnosis at histopathological assessment (8.7%: N=43, 28 CC, 15 LC). The regression model adjusted for age and gender showed a significant negative association between the diagnosis of CM and colorectal neoplasia (OR=0.39; 95% CI 0.22−0.67, p <0.001) with a 60% decreased risk of adenomatous and neoplastic serrated polyps as compared to the control group (n=412).

This multi-center study confirms MC as a low-risk condition for colorectal neoplasia. No surveillance colonoscopy program is to be performed for MC diagnosis.

Lymphocytic and collagenous colitis are types of microscopic colitis (MC) that commonly cause chronic watery diarrhea, but there are no macroscopic features of MC that can be detected during colonoscopy. Endoscopists therefore often collect multiple random colonic biopsies, potentially oversampling, increasing times of colonoscopy and slide review. We sought to identify sites from which biopsies could be taken and analyzed to identify patients with MC with a high level of sensitivity and determine the appropriate number of biopsies to take at these sites.

We performed a retrospective study using biopsies from 101 consecutive patients with MC (52 cases of collagenous colitis, 42 cases of lymphocytic colitis, 7 combined cases), without comorbidities, from 2017 through 2018. Slides were reviewed, and the proportion of biopsies that were diagnostic of MC were calculated at each biopsy site.

The proportions of biopsy fragments from each site of the colon found to be positive for MC were as follows: cecum, 90.0%; ascending colon, 96.9%; hepatic flexure, 77.8%; transverse colon, 95.7%; splenic flexure, 75.0%; descending colon, 85.0%; sigmoid colon, 90.9%; and rectum, 82.2%. For biopsies labeled random, 95.7% were positive for MC. When findings from ascending and descending colon biopsies were combined, 100% of MC cases were detected.

MC can be detected with certainty by analyzing biopsies from the ascending and descending colon. Fewer biopsies than were collected from our cases are sufficient for diagnosis. We propose a Western protocol (taking 2 biopsies from each of the ascending and descending colon) in evaluation of patients for MC.

Payments from pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to authors of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) may influence practice recommendations. It is therefore important to evaluate the completeness of financial conflict of interest (FCOI) declarations among CPG authors.

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of industry payments to authors of endoscopy guidelines published by 5 GI societies between 2014 and 2017. For each author we identified payments using the disclosure section of CPGs and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments (CMS-OP) database. We calculated the prevalence, monetary value, and type of declared and undeclared payments among authors. Payments were assessed for the calendar year of and before publication.

Thirty-seven CPGs were included in the analysis comprising 569 author entries (91 unique individuals; 66.43% men, 92.6% physicians, 66.4% academically affiliated). Four hundred fifty-one episodes (79%) involved FCOIs, 451 (79%) had undisclosed FCOIs in the CMS-OP, and 445 (77%) had FCOIs relevant to a CPG recommendation. The median undisclosed payment value was $4807.26 (interquartile range, $334.84-$20,579.75). Male authors (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-3.39) and academically affiliated authors (odds ratio, 8.87; 95% confidence interval, 5.57-14.13) were significantly more likely to have undeclared payments (P < .001). No CPGs met all National Academy of Medicine criteria.

Recognizing concerns about the accuracy of the CMS-OP, there are substantial discrepancies between industry-reported payments and author self-disclosure. Additionally, there is a high prevalence of undisclosed payments by pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to these authors. Given the potential impact of these discrepancies and undisclosed payments on CPGs, more accurate reporting and alternative strategies for managing FCOI are needed.

There are various colonoscopic features in active or quiescent ulcerative colitis, including erosions, ulcers, erythema, edema, friability, spontaneous bleeding, granularity, nodularity, sessile or pedunculated inflammatory polyps, mucosal scars and bridges, luminal lead piping, and benign or malignant strictures. These endoscopic features may coexist in an individual patient. The patients may present with cecal patch, rectal sparing and backwash ileitis. Recognition of these endoscopic features along with tissue biopsy is imperative for the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, disease monitoring, assessment of treatment response, and dysplasia surveillance.

We aimed to develop and validate a risk scoring system to determine the risk of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) and predict patient outcomes.

We first performed a retrospective analysis of data from 439 patients emergently hospitalized for acute LGIB at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Japan, from January 2009 through December 2013. We used data on comorbidities, medication, presenting symptoms, and vital signs, and laboratory test results to develop a scoring system for severe LGIB (defined as continuous and/or recurrent bleeding). We validated the risk score in a prospective study of 161 patients with acute LGIB admitted to the same center from April 2014 through April 2015. We assessed the system’s accuracy in predicting patient outcome using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis. All patients underwent colonoscopy.

In the first study, 29% of the patients developed severe LGIB. We devised a risk scoring system based on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use, no diarrhea, no abdominal tenderness, blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or lower, antiplatelet drugs use, albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL, disease scores of 2 or higher, and syncope (NOBLADS), which all were independent correlates of severe LGIB. Severe LGIB developed in 75.7% of patients with scores of 5 or higher compared with 2% of patients without any of the factors correlated with severe LGIB (P < .001). The NOBLADS score determined the severity of LGIB with an AUC value of 0.77. In the validation (second) study, severe LGIB developed in 35% of patients; the NOBLADS score predicted the severity of LGIB with an AUC value of 0.76. Higher NOBLADS scores were associated with a requirement for blood transfusion, longer hospital stay, and intervention (P < .05 for trend).

We developed and validated a scoring system for risk of severe LGIB based on 8 factors (NOBLADS score). The system also determined the risk for blood transfusion, longer hospital stay, and intervention. It might be used in decision making regarding intervention and management.