Original ArticlePoverty-associated risk factors for wheezing in the first year of life in Honduras and El Salvador
Introduction
Although risk factors for wheezing during infancy and preschool age have been extensively studied in developed countries, there is much less information about those risk factors when wheezing is restricted just to the first year of life. Furthermore, the information from low-resourced countries is almost inexistent.1
One of the earliest results on those risk factors during the first year of life was reported by Bisgaard et al.2 who found that poor social environment, a smoking mother, day-care attendance, male gender, being born in April through September (in Denmark) and preterm birth were all independent risk factors for wheezing. Day-care attendance has been pointed out as a very important risk factor in subsequent studies.3, 4, 5 Parental history of asthma -sometimes only maternal 6 if wheeze persistency was considered- has also been found to be associated to early infant wheezing in several studies, which have focused their attention on the first year of life6, 7. Parental smoking has also been consistently associated to wheezing during the first year of life 5, 6, and smoking during pregnancy seems to be a risk factor independently of the mother smoking after delivery.8, 9, 10 In fact, smoking in pregnancy is related to a poor lung function in the infant at one month of age.11
The prevalence of first year wheeze decreased to half after a heavily pollutant factory was closed in Calarasi (Romania).12 Dampness at home has also been found to be a risk factor for early wheeze 13 independently of house dust mites growing. Recently, antibiotics consumption by the mother during pregnancy 14, rotavirus infection during the first year 15, and Chlamydia pneumoniae infection at 4 years 16 have also been significantly associated to wheezing during the first months of life. Furthermore, high mass index in the newborn is associated with reduced neonatal lung function11.
The aforementioned studies have been carried out in affluent countries. However, two of them have pointed out that poor economic conditions and young maternal age (which is more frequent in non-affluent countries) may be risk factors for early wheezing.2, 6 Thus, we were interested in studying situations derived from poverty, which can be found more easily in non-affluent countries, and how they could be associated to the prevalence of wheeze. Therefore, we conducted a survey in a population-based cohort of one-year-old infants in San Pedro Sula (Honduras) and La Libertad (El Salvador), which are both non-affluent countries with similar genetic and environmental backgrounds.
Section snippets
Methods
The “Estudio Internacional de Sibilancias en Lactantes (EISL)” (International Study of Wheezing in Infants) is a multicentre, cross-sectional, international, population-based study which is carried out using standardised methods and a validated questionnaire 17, 18, 19 partially based on that of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) (http://www.isaac.auckland.ac.nz). It includes questions on wheezing during the first year of life and also on risk/protective
Results
The number of parents answering the questionnaire was 1101 in the centre of San Pedro Sula (participation rate 84.5%) and 1685 in the centre of La Libertad (participation rate 87.2%). After discarding those questionnaires with no answer in the key question about wheezing, or in the number of wheezing episodes, or having the first episode after the age of 12 months; or being younger than 11 months or older than 15 months; the numbers were reduced to 780 (Honduras) and 1047 (EL Salvador).
The
Discussion
The present paper shows that in apparently comparable environmental circumstances, the prevalence of wheezing during the first year of life may be quite different. Although as a country Honduras has a lower economic level, it is quite possible that the population studied in this country had better socio-economic level than that studied in El Salvador, as shown in the percentage of air-conditioning devices, electrical fans, in-house complete toilets, paved floor in the houses and direct drinking
Acknowledgments
Funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation, grants A/8585/07 and A/8579/07; and grant 11663/EE2/09 from the Seneca Foundation and Technology & Science Agency, Murcia Region, Spain (II PCTRM 2007–2010). We are grateful to Mr. Anthony Carlson for his help with the English version of the present paper.
Reference (39)
- et al.
Wheezing during the first year of life in infants from low-income population: a descriptive study
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr )
(2005) - et al.
Mold damage in homes and wheezing in infants
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
(2006) - et al.
Propuesta de un indicador de "clase social" basada en la ocupación
Gac Sanit
(1989) - et al.
Mold exposure during infancy as a predictor of potential asthma development
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
(2009) - et al.
Indoor exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and dampness: respiratory symptoms in Sardinian children--DRIAS study
Environ Res
(2009) - et al.
Exposure to Aspergillus fumigatus spores induces chemokine expression in mouse macrophages
Toxicology
(2004) - et al.
Risk factors for wheezing during infancy. A study of 5,953 infants
Acta Paediatr Scand
(1987) - et al.
Lower respiratory illness, recurrent wheezing, and day care attendance
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(1997) - et al.
Entry age into day care and later development of allergic disorders--results from the city of Leipzig cohort of the LISA study
Cent Eur J Public Health
(2006) - et al.
Perinatal risk factors for sensitization, atopic dermatitis and wheezing during the first year of life (PIPO study)
Clin Exp Allergy
(2005)