Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 35, Issue 8, August 2010, Pages 750-755
Addictive Behaviors

Brief Motivational Intervention and telemedicine: A new perspective of treatment to marijuana users

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the telephone Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) efficacy in marijuana consumption cessation. A clinical trial was performed on Brazilian citizens, who were randomly divided into experimental (BMI) and minimal intervention (reference material) treatment groups; the study involved 524 participants who were monitored for 6 months. In addition, the data was collected by a free-service call center; both marijuana consumption and level of motivation for behavior change were evaluated, based on the telephone service offered. The proportion of abstainers in the BMI group was significantly greater than in the control group: 73% of the individuals in the BMI group were abstainers. In the control group, 59% of them ceased on using marijuana. The ratio of probability for marijuana cessation was 1.6 times higher in the BMI group. There was no significant difference on the motivation for behavior change in both groups. The collected data demonstrated the telephone BMI's positive efficacy in marijuana consumption cessation.

Introduction

Marijuana usage is associated to important psychosocial problems (Babor, 2004, Budney et al., 2003, McCambridge et al., 2008, Vandrey and Haney, 2009) and its consumption is increasing worldwide (Almeida et al., 2008, Budney et al., 2007, Copeland and Maxwell, 2007, Galduróz et al., 2004, Hall and Degenhardt, 2009, Steinberg et al., 2005). Surveys estimate that approximately 2.1 million people in the world initiated marijuana use in 2007 (SAMHSA, 2008). Marijuana users frequently do not know how, where and what kind of treatment to look for (Macleod et al., 2004), which may be associated with the fact that there are a small amount of specific treatments for marijuana dependence, since many programs are often directed to users, such as alcohol and cocaine (Hall and Degenhardt, 2009, Steinberg et al., 2005).

The difficulty in obtaining drug dependence services at governmental health care facilities is due to the high costs, therefore, alternative measures to promote marijuana consumption cessation are necessary (Budney et al., 2007). In general, brief interventions have been developed for drug dependence treatment (McCambridge and Strang, 2004, McCambridge et al., 2008, Steinberg et al., 2005; Budney et al., 2007, Miller et al., 2003). In addition, face-to-face Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) has shown to be effective on marijuana cessation after a follow-up about 3 to 6 months (Stephens et al., 2000, Vandrey and Haney, 2009).

Another option for drug dependence treatment is through telemedicine, offering a personalized assistance. Different services are supplied, such as advices provided through telephone calls (Bishof et al., 2008, Mar, 1, Lancaster and Stead, 2005) combined or not with supporting materials (Britt, Hudson, & Blampied, 2004). Although BMI is currently shown as effective in marijuana abuse/dependence, its practice through telephone-based services still lacks evaluation. The purpose of this study is to verify whether the BMI offered through telephone counseling increases the chances of marijuana cessation and relapse prevention, when compared to the control group.

We hypothesized that telephone-based BMI would entail a higher efficacy than a self-help material (minimal intervention) for marijuana use abstinence and relapse prevention; also it would induce a greater compliance for telephone-based follow-up as well as a most likely chance to reach higher motivation stages to change drug use behaviors.

Section snippets

Methods

The population considered was composed by self-reported marijuana users from all Brazilian regions who called to a toll-free phone number between January 2006 and September 2007 (n = 1982). The study included users who intended to stop using marijuana and the ones who accepted participating in the study through a verbal informed consent term. Because it is a telephone service, the informed consent form was administered orally to the user. The study was approved by the Ethics Research Committee of

Results

The final sample that provided data to be analyzed was composed by 524 participants who concluded a 6-month follow-up. Each of the two previously divided (BMI and control) groups had 262 individuals (Fig. 1). We selected the first 262 individuals for each group who completed the follow-up of 6 months. In the analysis of sociodemographic data frequency, male individuals were predominant (74%), with mean to 25 years old. The predominant education level was medium level or higher (58%), family

Discussion and conclusions

This study showed that telephone-based BMI for marijuana dependent users increases the chance for maintenance of quitting marijuana use. It also detected, as expected, that individuals who were in a higher motivation stage to change drug use behavior had better chances to reach the outcome. Females were twice likely to maintain abstinence than males.

This study showed that most participants had never searched for help and that marijuana consumption associated with other drugs is high, which

Role of Funding Sources

Funding for this study was provided by Secretaria Nacional de Políticas Sobre Drogas—SENAD. SENAD had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

S.F designed the study and wrote the protocol. S.F. and M.F. conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies. T.C.M. and H.M.T.B. conducted the statistical analysis. S.F., P.S.P. and C.G.M. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Secretaria Políticas Sobre Drogas (SENAD) for research funding and inform that HMTB receives a 1C Research Productivity Grant from CNPQ.

References (34)

  • L. Biener et al.

    The contemplation Ladder: Validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation

    Journal Health Psychology

    (1991)
  • G. Bishof et al.

    Evaluation of a telephone-based stepped care intervention for alcohol-related disorders: A randomized controlled trial

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2008, Mar, 1)
  • A.J. Budney et al.

    The time course and significance of cannabis withdrawal

    Journal Abnormal Psychological

    (2003)
  • A.J. Budney et al.

    Marijuana dependence and its treatment

    Addiction Science and Clinical Practice

    (2007)
  • E.A. Carlini et al.

    II Levantamento Domiciliar sobre o Uso de Drogas Psicotrópicas no Brasil: Estudo Envolvendo as 108 Maiores Cidades do País

    (2007)
  • E.A. Carlini et al.

    I Levantamento Domiciliar sobre o Uso de Drogas Psicotrópicas no Brasil: Estudo Envolvendo as 107 Maiores Cidades do País

    (2002)
  • J. Copeland et al.

    Cannabis treatment outcomes among legally coerced and non-coerced adults

    BMC Public Health

    (2007)
  • Cited by (31)

    • A clinical trial on a brief motivational intervention in reducing alcohol consumption under a telehealth supportive counseling

      2021, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The data gathering was carried out by 40 research assistants and counselors, who were previously selected, trained, and supervised according to the service routine (Barros et al, 2008). The study consisted of seven prospective telephone contacts with the participants (1, 3, and 7 days as well as 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the first call to the service) according to the agreed protocol (Barros et al., 2008; (Fernandes et al., 2010); Signor et al., 2013; Constant et al., 2018). The data analysis used structural equation modeling considering information from the first measurement (Pre intervention) and six months follow-up (Post intervention).

    • Interventions for cannabis use disorder

      2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
    • Brief interventions for cannabis use in emerging adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map

      2019, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most common follow-up time was three months post-intervention. Most interventions were brief motivational interventions (BMIs; i = 27), two were psychoeducational, one was a normative-feedback only intervention (Hernandez-Meier and Otto-Salaj, 2016), one involved setting a stop-date (Fernandes et al., 2010), and the last was an integrated brief intervention (IBI) (Lang et al., 2000) (Table 2). The majority were single session interventions (69%; i = 22) and were delivered in-person (59%; i = 19).

    • Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries: a narrative review of the literature

      2017, The Lancet Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In another study from Brazil,62 an online motivational intervention for preventing general substance misuse was as effective at reducing use of alcohol, cannabis, and other drugs as a face-to-face version of the same intervention. A 6 month telephone-based brief motivational intervention from Brazil was effective at promoting cannabis cessation among individuals who completed the programme; however, attrition rates were high.63 Low participation and high attrition were likewise observed in an online substance misuse prevention programme from Uruguay, although email and SMS text-message reminders were able to improve engagement with the intervention.64

    • Treating Cannabis Use Disorders Through Technology-Assisted Interventions: The Telephone and Internet

      2017, Handbook of Cannabis and Related Pathologies: Biology, Pharmacology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    • Systematic analysis of changes in cannabis use among participants in control conditions of randomised controlled trials

      2015, Addictive Behaviors Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      A final decision on inclusion was determined after reading the full paper, and any that raised potential questions on inclusion were reviewed by all authors, until consensus was reached. Studies by Copeland et al. (2001), Lozano et al. (2006), Kadden et al. (2007), Kay-Lambkin et al. (2009), Fernandes et al. (2010), Peters et al. (2011), Stein et al. (2011), Walker et al. (2011), Litt et al. (2013) and Hoch et al. (2014) were excluded due to an inability to calculate a within-group effect size on cannabis use per month from the data provided. The control groups of Stephens et al. (1994), Hendriks et al. (2011) and Budney et al. (2000) provided too much support for them to meet inclusion criteria as a control treatment condition.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text