Chapter Four - Molecular Classification of Primary Immunodeficiencies of T Lymphocytes
Introduction
This theme has been at the centre of all my research…, both because of its intrinsic fascination and my conviction that a knowledge of sequences could contribute much to our understanding of living matter.
Frederick Sanger
T lymphocyte cells (T cells) play a central role in the adaptive immune response, coordinating immune functions comprising both humoral and cell-mediated responses to a myriad of immunogenic challenges including infection and cancer. Therefore, understanding how these cells work in humans requires a detailed molecular approach combining cellular immunology, clinical investigation, and human genetics. Normally, mechanisms of central and peripheral tolerance limit the response to self, thus preventing autoimmune disease. These varied and at times conflicting roles require many levels of control to appropriately modulate T cell-mediated immune responses. These include regulation of T cell development, maintenance of quiescence and self-tolerance, initiation and maintenance of T cell activation in response to cognate antigen, migration to effector sites, effector function, differentiation, and maintenance of a memory population. Multiple genes regulate these steps in ways critical to proper immune responses. One method of identifying important regulators of T cell function is a genetic approach involving the investigation of individuals with inborn errors of immunity. These primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) result in diverse and overlapping clinical phenotypes including immunodeficiency (susceptibility to malignancy or infection), abnormal cellular homeostasis, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, and allergy. PIDs represent a forward genetic screen of nature, meaning that a phenotype is first identified—often provoked by infectious and noninfectious immunological challenges that the patients encounter—and then the pathophysiological attributes in immunity and ultimately gene variants that correlate with disease are interrogated. Within the last decade, the development of inexpensive technologies for sequencing the DNA of the human genome or exome (the coding portion of the genome) have allowed for the rapid identification of the genetic variants underlying various PIDs. This coupled with the vast reach of clinical medicine to identify, characterize, and follow longitudinally patient phenotypes has facilitated a powerful new approach to understand the effect of genotype variation on human immune function. In this chapter, we will discuss the biochemical and molecular basis of disease in PIDs caused in whole or in part by defects in T cell function.
Section snippets
PIDs
PIDs are most easily understood when they are caused by highly penetrant single-gene errors. Clinical manifestations of PIDs usually present in childhood and can be due to either de novo or hereditary mutations with various Mendelian modes of inheritance (MOIs). Affected genes can be specifically required for a certain immune response, formation of a single immunological cell type, or may more broadly affect a common cellular process necessary for proper immunological function. As such, PIDs
PIDs of T Cell Function
In this section, we will discuss T cell-intrinsic PIDs, characterizing these mutations by the molecular mechanism that is disrupted in each PID rather than by the associated clinical or cellular phenotype. PIDs affecting T cell function that are caused by alterations in antigen-presentation cells (APCs) or other external determinants of T cell development/function will not be discussed and some have been reviewed elsewhere (Conley et al., 2009). Importantly, several proteins have roles in
Current Challenges/Approaches and Future Considerations
One of the greatest challenges facing clinicians and scientists in the identification and study of causal variants in PIDs, and genetic disease in general, is the need to supersede correlation to establish causality of potentially pathogenic variants. This is complicated by the extensive nucleotide variation in the human genome, much of which is mysterious or, at best benign polymorphism. Several things make this challenge more tractable. First, it is very useful to be able to evaluate genomic
References (460)
The phenotype of human STK4 deficiency
Blood
(2012)- et al.
XLF interacts with the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining
Cell
(2006) - et al.
MYSM1 is mutated in a family with transient transfusion-dependent anemia, mild thrombocytopenia, and low NK- and B-cell counts
Blood
(2013) WIP deficiency reveals a differential role for WIP and the actin cytoskeleton in T and B cell activation
Immunity
(2002)- et al.
Defective T cell receptor signaling and CD8 + thymic selection in humans lacking zap-70 kinase
Cell
(1994) Mutations in tetratricopeptide repeat domain 7A result in a severe form of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease
Gastroenterology
(2014)Myb-like, SWIRM, and MPN domains 1 (MYSM1) deficiency: Genotoxic stress-associated bone marrow failure and developmental aberrations
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
(2017)WHIM syndromes with different genetic anomalies are accounted for by impaired CXCR4 desensitization to CXCL12
Blood
(2005)- et al.
Adenosine deaminase deficiency: Metabolic basis of immune deficiency and pulmonary inflammation
Advances in Immunology
(2005) Whole-exome-sequencing-based discovery of human FADD deficiency
American Journal of Human Geneticse
(2010)