Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
70
Original article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.08.007
Open Access
Available online 15 November 2019
Red reflex test at the maternity hospital: results from a tertiary hospital and variables associated with inconclusive test results☆☆
Visits
70
Vinicius Mac Cord Lanes Baldinoa,
Corresponding author
vmclbaldino@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Gabriela Unchalo Eckertb, Juliana Rossattob, Mário Bernardes Wagnerc
a Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
b Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Departamento de Oftalmologia e Otorrinolaringologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
c Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Departamento de Medicina Social. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Received 05 March 2019. Accepted 16 August 2019
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (2)
Table 1. Characteristics of individuals from inconclusive RRT and control groups.a
Table 2. Differences in RRT outcomes according to ethnicity.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objectives

Describe the results of the red reflex test in full-term newborns, as well as identify factors associated with red reflex test outcome and compare hospital length of stay between patients with inconclusive and normal red reflex test results.

Methods

Descriptive cross-sectional study of the results of the red reflex test performed in a tertiary hospital maternity unit between 2014 and 2018. A nested case-control study was also performed to search for anthropometric, gestational, and neonatal variables associated with the outcome of the red reflex test.

Results

There were121 identified cases of inconclusive red reflex test in 11,833 newborns. Sixteen alterations were confirmed, four considered severe: two cases of congenital glaucoma, one of cataract, and one of coloboma. Mean birth weight (p=0.04), length (p=0.03), and head circumference (p=0.02) were lower in patients with inconclusive red reflex test; however without a relevant effect size (d=−0.21, −0.22, and −0.25, respectively).The proportion of white, mixed-race, and black patients was significantly different between the groups (p<0.001), with a higher chance of inconclusive results in mixed-race (OR=2.22) and black (OR=3.37) patients when compared to whites. An inconclusive red reflex test led to an increase in hospital length of stay from 62 to 82h (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The red reflex test was able to identify four severe alterations in 11,833 newborns (0.03%). In the 121 newborns in which the red reflex test was classified as inconclusive, there was a 20h increase in the hospital length of stay, but a severe alteration was confirmed in only 3.3% of them. Differences in red reflex between white, mixed-race, and black patients should be considered.

Keywords:
Newborn
Newborn screening
Leukocoria
Blindness
Red reflex test
PALAVRAS-CHAVE:
Recém-nascido
Triagem neonatal
Leucocoria
Cegueira
Teste do reflexo vermelho
Resumo
Objetivos

Descrever os resultados do teste do reflexo vermelho em recém-nascidos a termo. Identificar fatores associados ao resultado do teste do reflexo vermelho e comparar o tempo de internação entre pacientes com teste do reflexo vermelho duvidoso e normal.

Métodos

Estudo transversal descritivo dos resultados do teste do reflexo vermelho realizado em maternidade de hospital terciário entre 2014 e 2018. Foi ainda realizado estudo de caso-controle aninhado para pesquisa de variáveis antropométricas, gestacionais e neonatais associadas ao resultado do teste do reflexo vermelho.

Resultados

Foram identificados 121 casos de teste do reflexo vermelho duvidoso em 11833 recém-nascidos. Foram confirmadas 16 alterações, 4 delas consideradas graves: 2 casos de glaucoma congênito, 1 de catarata e 1 de coloboma. As médias de peso de nascimento (p=0,04), comprimento (p=0,03) e perímetro cefálico (p=0,02) foram menores nos pacientes com teste do reflexo vermelho duvidoso, entretanto sem um tamanho de efeito relevante (d = -0,21; -0,22 e -0,25; respectivamente). A proporção de pacientes brancos, pardos e negros foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos (p<0,001), com maior chance de resultado duvidoso para pardos (OR=2,22) e negros (OR=3,37) em comparação a brancos. O teste do reflexo vermelho duvidoso levou a um aumento no tempo de internação de 62 para 82 horas (p<0,001).

Conclusões

O teste do reflexo vermelho foi capaz de identificar 4 alterações graves em 11833 recém-nascidos (0,03%). Nos 121 recém-nascidos em que o teste do reflexo vermelho foi classificado como duvidoso, houve aumento de 20 horas no tempo de internação hospitalar, porém se confirmou alteração grave em apenas 3,3% deles. Diferenças no reflexo vermelho entre brancos, pardos e negros devem ser consideradas.

Full Text
Introduction

Although childhood visual impairment (VI) accounts for only approximately 6% of VI cases worldwide,1 its importance should not be underestimated. The number of “years of blindness” in children with VI equals that of adults with cataracts.2 Vision is a crucial sense in childhood, so VI affects the patient's neuropsychomotor development and educational needs.3 The number and duration of hospitalizations are higher in children with VI.4 Mortality in children with VI is higher than in those with preserved visual function, and VI, even in the absence of other comorbidities, has been implicated as a predictor of death.3

Early diagnosis of childhood VI is of the utmost importance. Visual maturation occurs mostly up to 5 years of age, concomitantly with eye and brain development.5 Therefore, there is a critical period in which the visual system must be intact and during which interventions are more likely to result in visual improvement.6 Although there is evidence supporting the late treatment of amblyopia (unilateral or bilateral reduction of visual acuity secondary to insufficient or inadequate visual stimulation during the critical period),7 it is known that the visual system gradually becomes less responsive and the benefit of interventions is progressively reduced.6,8

The red reflex test (RRT), also known as the “red eye reflex test,” is recommended for the screening of childhood eye alterations by several societies, including the American Academy of Pediatricians and the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics.9,10 In Brazil, the RRT is mandatory while the newborn (NB) is still at maternity hospital in some states and there is pending legislation to require RRT in all NBs nationally.11

The RRT should be performed in a dark environment and the source of light should be projected simultaneously on both eyes of the patient. The reflexes of each eye should be compared and evaluated for brightness, size, and color. The RRT is classified as normal, inconclusive, or altered; the last two outcomes require subsequent evaluation. The absence of reflection, a white or yellow reflex, as well as the observation of substantial differences between the eyes, are indicative that there may be some eye alteration and constitute criteria for referral to an ophthalmologist.12

The RRT is described as a rapid and painless test. However, patients with suspected alterations should undergo a detailed, more invasive and pain-associated ophthalmologic assessment.13 Additionally, information from an apparently altered test in the NB and the waiting period for ophthalmologic assessment may lead to emotional stress and even increased length of hospital stay, which in turn leads to increased risk of nosocomial infections and costs.14 Therefore, the identification of factors that may be associated with an increase in the number of false positives from the RRT is pertinent.

Despite its importance and broad recommendation, the results of the RRT are scarce in the literature.15–17 The Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) is a tertiary university hospital that performs the RRT in all NBs before hospital discharge. The present study was carried out with the objective of analyzing the results of the hospital screening program, as well as identifying non-ocular factors that may be related to an inconclusive RRT.

Patients and methodsPopulation

A retrospective evaluation of patients born in the hospital between January 1, 2014 and January 31, 2018 was performed. All NBs undergo RRT before hospital discharge and inconclusive or altered cases are evaluated by an ophthalmologist during the hospital stay.

All neonates born during the study period who were under rooming-in care were included. The patients were divided into two groups:

Inconclusive RRT group: all patients with RRT classified by the pediatrician as inconclusive or altered.

Control group: consisted of a sample of NBs with normal RRT.

There was no matching and the medical records of all NBs were randomly organized in an Excel (Microsoft Corporation®, Excel, WA, USA) spreadsheet using the “RANDOM ()” command; then the first 450 were selected. Of these, two were part of the “inconclusive RRT” group and another five were excluded due to admission at the semi-intensive therapy unit before discharge.

Patients requiring intensive or semi-intensive care unit admission, as well as those with incomplete medical records, were excluded.

Sample size

The period to be studied was defined by the availability of information regarding ophthalmologic consultations in computerized medical records at the HCPA. The inclusion of four controls for each case was established for the case-control study.

A total of 564 NBs were included (121 patients with inconclusive RRT and a sample of 443 individuals with normal RRT), which provided the study with a statistical power of 83% to detect a difference of 0.3 standard deviations between the means of epidemiological and anthropometric variables analyzed between the groups. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Study design

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study of RRT results and subsequent ophthalmologic evaluation. A nested case-control study was also performed. The result of the RRT was considered an outcome and the anthropometric, neonatal, and gestational variables were considered as predictors.

RRT and ophthalmologic evaluation

The RRT was performed by resident physicians in pediatrics under the supervision of professors. The protocol recommends that it be performed in a dark environment with the ophthalmoscope lens diopter set at “0″ and that the light be projected simultaneously on both eyes of the subject, at a distance of approximately 45cm. The absence of reflex in one or both eyes, the observation of a white or yellowish reflex, dark spots in the reflex, as well as the existence of asymmetry between the eyes constitute criteria for referral to the ophthalmologist.

The ophthalmologic examination was performed after pharmacological mydriasis with 0.5% tropicamide. Patients were submitted to indirect binocular ophthalmoscope evaluation for ocular media opacities (cornea, aqueous humor, crystalline, and vitreous humor), as well as the assessment of fundus structures.

Ophthalmological alterations were considered severe when they required surgical intervention or outpatient follow-up.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. This research did not receive any specific grants from public, commercial, or nonprofit funding agencies.

Statistical analysis

The normality of the samples was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables as counts and percentages. The percentages—with their respective 95% confidence intervals—were presented for the descriptive results. Student's t-test was used to compare the means of continuous variables between the groups and the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test to compare categorical variables. Association measures between variables and groups were calculated, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for categorical variables and Cohen's d statistics for continuous variables. A significance level of 5% was adopted in all analyses. Data were analyzed using SPSS (SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

A total of 13,296 records of patients born in the HCPA were identified during the study period who were under rooming-in care. Of these, 1301 were excluded for admission at the semi-intensive care or the intensive care unit, and 162 due to missing or discrepant information in the medical records. The study flowchart is shown in Fig. 1.The authors identified 121 cases of inconclusive RRT among 11,833 NBs during the study period, which corresponds to 1.0% (95%CI: 0.8–1.2). After the ophthalmologic evaluation, 16 cases of alterations were confirmed (13.2% [95% CI: 7.7–20.6] among the suspected cases and 0.14% [95% CI: 0.09–0.23] of the total number of patients). Retinal hemorrhage was the most frequently observed alteration, being identified in 12 of the patients; it did not require follow-up in any of them. Four cases of severe eye alterations were identified (3.3% [95% CI: 0.9–8.2] of suspected cases and 0.03% [95% CI: 0.01–0.09] of the total number of patients). The two patients with congenital glaucoma were submitted to surgical procedure before hospital discharge, and the patient with congenital cataract was discharged and submitted to surgical procedure in the 4th week of life. The case of iris coloboma and choroid was referred for outpatient follow-up.

Fig. 1.

Study flowchart. RRT refers to red reflex test.

Alterations that required intervention or follow-up were considered severe.

(0.21MB).

Anthropometric, gestational, and neonatal variables of the inconclusive RRT and control groups are shown in Table 1. Patients in the two groups did not differ significantly regarding gender (p=0.53), weight adequacy (p=0.32), type of delivery (p=0.38), gestational age (p=0.31), and Apgar score at the 1st (p=0.11) and 5th (p=0.45) minutes.

Table 1.

Characteristics of individuals from inconclusive RRT and control groups.a

Characteristic  Inconclusive RRT n=121  Control n=443  pb 
Male gender, n (%)  64 (52.9)  218 (49.2)  0.53 
Birth weight, g  3,190±450  3,290±480  0.04 
Weight adequacy, n (%)      0.32 
SGA  18 (14.9)  47 (10.7)   
AGA  97 (80.1)  360 (81.8)   
LGA  6 (5.0)  33 (7.5)   
Length, cm  48.2±2.1  48.7±2.3  0.03 
Head circumference, cm  33.6±1.5  34.0±1.6  0.02 
Ethnicity, n (%)      < 0.001 
White  55 (45.4)  305 (68.8)   
Mixed-race  33 (27.3)  83 (18.7)   
Black  33 (27.3)  55 (12.4)   
Vaginal delivery, n (%)  78 (64.5)  305 (68.2)  0.38 
Gestational age, wks.  39.4±1.6  39.2±1.5  0.31 
Apgar 1min, n (%)      0.11 
<4  1 (0.8)  4 (0.9)   
4–6  9 (7.4)  14 (3.2)   
≥7  111 (91.7)  425 (95.9)   
Apgar5 min, n (%)      0.45 
<4  0 (0.0)  0 (0.0)   
4–6  0 (0.0)  2 (0.5)   
≥7  121 (100.0)  441 (99.5)   
Length of stay, h  81.8±37.4  61.7±29.1  < 0.001 

RRT, red reflex test; SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, adequate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational ag.

a

Values±shown correspond to mean±standard deviation.

b

p-values calculated with Fisher's test and Student's t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

The mean birth weight (p=0.04), length (p=0.03), and head circumference (p=0.02) were lower in the inconclusive RRT group compared to controls, but without a relevant effect size (d=−0.21; −0.22, and −0.25; respectively). Mixed-race and black patients had their RRT results classified as inconclusive more often than whites(Table 2), with an OR=2.22 (95% CI: 1.35–3.65) for mixed-race vs. white and 3.35 (95% CI: 1.99–5.64) for black vs. white patients (p<0.001).Although non-whites had proportionally more inconclusive RRTs, all severe alterations were identified in white patients, and there was a statistically significant difference between them (0/66 vs. 4/55, p=0.03).

Table 2.

Differences in RRT outcomes according to ethnicity.

  Ethnicity, n (%)Odds ratio (95%CI)p of tendency
  White n=356  Mixed-race n=116  Black n=88  Mixed-race vs. white  Black vs. white 
Inconclusive RRT  55 (15.4)  33 (28.4)  33 (37.5)  2.22 (1.35–3.65)  3.35 (1.99–5.64)  <0.001 

RRT, red reflex test.

An inconclusive RRT led to a 20h increase in average hospital length of stay (61h vs. 81h, p<0.001).

Discussion

Vinekar et al.18 examined 1021 full-term NBs using a RetCam (Massie Research Laboratories, Inc –Dublin, California, USA), a digital camera capable of documenting eye structures, and found severe alterations (requiring medical care or surgical intervention) in 0.9% of cases, including one patient with retinoblastoma. Li et al.19 performed RetCam evaluation on 14,786 individuals and identified eye alterations in 2% (excluding cases of retinal hemorrhage), including treatable retinal diseases, 11 cases of congenital cataract, three cases of retinoblastoma, in addition to eye abnormalities that may be associated with systemic diseases such as microphthalmia and congenital optic nerve anomalies. Wasilewski et al.,20 in a prospective study in which ophthalmologists evaluated 667 NBs in the maternity ward, identified ocular alterations in 25 (3.75%). It is noteworthy that in 56% of patients with altered ophthalmologic examination, the pediatrician did not identify any abnormality on the routine examination. It should be noted that although some of these alterations were not of major relevance for neonatal screening, there was one case of iris coloboma and choroid, and two cases of congenital cataract, severe conditions that could lead to blindness.

Among 7641 NBs in whom ophthalmic alterations identified with RRT or RetCam were compared, the sensitivity of RRT for anterior and posterior segment alterations was 99.6% and 4.1%, respectively.21

It should be recalled that, although more than 80% of the abnormalities undetected by the RRT in the posterior segment were retinal hemorrhages, most of which have an excellent prognosis,22 some alterations with treatment indication were not identified, including one case of retinoblastoma, which can be fatal.

Regarding specifically the retinoblastoma detection with RRT, the test was unable to detect abnormalities in all 13 eyes with lesions in the study by Khan and Al-Mesfer23 and, without pharmacological mydriasis, it identified leukocoria in only three of ten eyes with tumors in the evaluation by Canzano and Handa.24

Of 11,500 patients submitted to RRT in the maternity unit of an Israeli university hospital over a period of two years,16 12 (0.1%) suspected cases were identified. They underwent ophthalmologic evaluation, which diagnosed congenital cataract in five of them. Another evaluation,15 carried out in Italy, applied RRT to 22,272 NBs and found 461 (2.1%) suspected or altered cases. Of these, three had confirmation of severe eye alterations, which comprised two cases of cataract and one retinoblastoma.

The present study, carried out in the maternity unit of a tertiary university hospital, identified 121 (1.0%) cases of suspected RRT in 11,833 NBs. Of these, severe alterations were confirmed in four (3.33% of suspected cases and 0.03% of total NBs), a result close to that found in the Italian study,15 but with the identification of considerably fewer severe cases when compared to reports of global ophthalmologic evaluation, most of them performed with a RetCam.18–20

Despite the small number of identified severe alterations, the importance of making an early diagnosis should be stressed. Three of the four patients underwent surgery in the neonatal period, which is crucial for the prevention of blindness, and which would hardly have been possible without the identification of alterations by the RRT. In this sense, an evaluation performed in Sweden showed that performing the RRT at the maternity hospital increased by more than three-fold the number of patients with a diagnosis of cataract.25

Patients submitted to ophthalmologic evaluation due to inconclusive RRT had a 30% increase in hospital length of stay. Considering that 97% of them did not have any severe alterations, measures to reduce the number of false positive results should be evaluated.

The mean birth weight, length, and head circumference were statistically lower in the inconclusive RRT group when compared to controls, but without showing good discriminatory power between the groups. However, there was a statistically and clinically significant difference in the distribution of ethnic groups, with a higher proportion of mixed-race and black patients among NBs with inconclusive RRT. These patients corresponded to 55% of the suspected cases and there were no confirmations of severe ocular alteration.

Attention should be paid to differences in red reflex between white individuals and those with darker skin pigmentation, which is also associated with increased intraocular structure pigmentation and, consequently, darkening or attenuation of the red reflex. One possibility to be considered in inconclusive cases is the repetition of RRT after pharmacological mydriasis, which may facilitate the observation of the red reflex.

This study has some limitations. No routine refraction was performed in NBs assessed by ophthalmologists, which could have justified some cases of inconclusive RRT, as high refractive errors may cause red reflex alterations. Moreover, the fact that only NBs with inconclusive RRTs were evaluated by ophthalmologists makes it impossible to adequately estimate their accuracy.

Considering the implications of an early diagnosis of eye alterations, including the possibility of visual rehabilitation and the identification of both systemic comorbidities and potentially fatal diseases such as retinoblastoma, neonatal ophthalmologic screening is relevant. Ophthalmologic screening strategies with RetCam, performed experimentally,18,19 have diagnosed eye diseases in a considerably larger number of NBs compared to RRT, but their use is limited by practical (mainly due to the need for pupillary dilation and contact with ocular surface) and financial reasons.

Thus, the RRT is a practical, fast, and inexpensive test, which allows its performance in a large number of patients. Results of the use of the RRT in maternity hospitals are still, however, scarce. The comparison of a neonatal examination performed by an ophthalmologist (which although difficult to accomplish in terms of public health, is more accessible than using the RetCam) with the pediatric RRT should be considered. It is suggested that further research be directed towards the definition of the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the test, with particular concern for its sensitivity.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
D. Pascolini, S.P. Mariotti.
Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010.
Br J Ophthalmol, 96 (2012), pp. 614-618
[2]
C. Gilbert, A. Foster.
Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020 — The Right to Sight.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 6 (2001),
[3]
J.S. Rahi, N. Cable.
Severe visual impairment and blindness in children in the UK.
Lancet, 362 (2003), pp. 1359-1365
[4]
J.M. Crewe, G. Lam, A. Clark, K. Spilsbury, A.S. Mukhtar, N. Morlet, et al.
Hospitalization rates of children who are blind: hospitalization rates of blind children.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 41 (2013), pp. 773-778
[5]
S.R. Salomão, D.F. Ventura.
Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech-Teller acuity cards.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 36 (1995), pp. 657-670
[6]
J.M. Holmes, E.L. Lazar, B.M. Melia, W.F. Astle, L.R. Dagi, S.P. Donahue, et al.
Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children.
Arch Ophthalmol, 129 (2011), pp. 1451-1457
[7]
M.M. Scheiman, R.W. Hertle, R.W. Beck, A.R. Edwards, E. Birch, S.A. Cotter, et al.
Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years.
Arch Ophthalmol, 123 (2005), pp. 437-447
[8]
K.P. Cheng, D.A. Hiles, A.W. Biglan, M.C. Pettapiece.
Visual results after early surgical treatment of unilateral congenital cataracts.
Ophthalmology, 98 (1991), pp. 903-910
[9]
S.P. Donahue, C.N. Nixon, Section on Opthamology, American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, et al.
Visual system assessment in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians.
Pediatrics, 137 (2016), pp. 28-30
[10]
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Teste do olhinho.[cited01July 2019]. Available from: http://www.sbp.com.br/campanhas/campanha/cid/teste-do-olhinho.
[11]
Brasil. Seguridade a prova teste do olhinho obrigatório em todas as maternidades. [cited 01July 2019]. Available from: http://www2.camara.leg.br/camaranoticias/noticias/SAUDE/549282-SEGURIDADE-APROVA-TESTE-DO-OLHINHO-OBRIGATORIO-EM-TODAS-AS-MATERNIDADES.html.
[12]
S.P. Donahue, C.N. Baker, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics, et al.
Procedures for the evaluation of the visual system by pediatricians.
Pediatrics, 137 (2016), pp. 1
[13]
K.J. Anand.
International Evidence-Based Group for Neonatal Pain. Consensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn.
Arch PediatrAdolesc Med, 155 (2001), pp. 173-180
[14]
T.G. Emori, D.H. Culver, T.C. Horan, W.R. Jarvis, J.W. White, D.R. Olson, et al.
National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods.
Am J Infect Control, 19 (1991), pp. 19-35
[15]
C. Cagini, G. Tosi, F. Stracci, V.E. Rinaldi, A. Verrotti.
Red reflex examination in neonates: evaluation of 3 years of screening.
IntOphthalmol, 37 (2017), pp. 1199-1204
[16]
S. Eventov-Friedman, H. Leiba, O. Flidel-Rimon, A. Juster-Reicher, E.S. Shinwell.
The Red reflex examination in neonates: an efficient tool for early diagnosis of congenital ocular diseases.
Isr Med Assoc J, 12 (2010), pp. 259-261
[17]
A.C. Rodrigues, R.B. Prado, L. Miguel.
Implantação do exame do reflexo vermelho em crianças da região do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - SP - Brasil.
Arq Bras Oftalmol, 75 (2012), pp. 337-340
[18]
A. Vinekar, I. Govindaraj, C. Jayadev, A.K. Kumar, P. Sharma, S. Mangalesh, et al.
Universal ocular screening of 1021 term infants using wide-field digital imaging in a single public hospital in India - a pilot study.
Acta Ophthalmol, 93 (2015), pp. e372-6
[19]
L.H. Li, W.C. Wu, N. Li, J. Lu, G.M. Zhang, J.Y. Zhao, et al.
Full-term neonatal ophthalmic screening in China: a review of 4-year outcomes.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 48 (2017), pp. 983-992
[20]
D. Wasilewski, R.J. Zago, A.M. Bardal, T.M. Heusi, F.P. Carvalho, L.F. Maciel, et al.
Importância da avaliação oftalmológica em recém-natos.
J Pediatr (Rio J), 78 (2002), pp. 209-212
[21]
M. Sun, A. Ma, F. Li, K. Cheng, M. Zhang, H. Yang, et al.
Sensitivity and specificity of red reflex test in newborn eye screening.
J Pediatr, 179 (2016), pp. 192-196
[22]
P. Watts, S. Maguire, T. Kwok, B. Talabani, M. Mann, J. Wiener, et al.
Newborn retinal hemorrhages: a systematic review.
[23]
A.O. Khan, S. Al-Mesfer.
Lack of efficacy of dilated screening for retinoblastoma.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus, 42 (2005), pp. 205-210
[24]
J.C. Canzano, J.T. Handa.
Utility of pupillary dilation for detecting leukocoria in patients with retinoblastoma.
Pediatrics, 104 (1999), pp. e44
[25]
G. Magnusson, S. Bizjajeva, B. Haargaard, M. Lundström, A. Nyström, K. Tornqvist.
Congenital cataract screening in maternity wards is effective: evaluation of the Paediatric Cataract Register of Sweden.
Acta Paediatr, 102 (2013), pp. 263-267

Please cite this article as: Baldino VM, Eckert GU, Rossatto J, Wagner MB. Red reflex test at the maternity hospital: results from a tertiary hospital and variables associated with inconclusive test results. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.08.007

This study was carried out as a requirement to obtain a Master's Degree from the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de setembro de 2018, que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria, estarão sujeitos a uma taxa para que tenham sua publicação garantida. O artigo aceito somente será publicado após a comprovação do pagamento da taxa de publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a este jornal, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Para mais informações, contate assessoria@jped.com.br. Articles submitted as of September 1, 2018, which are accepted for publication in the Jornal de Pediatria, will be subject to a fee to have their publication guaranteed. The accepted article will only be published after proof of the publication fee payment. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge. For more information, contact assessoria@jped.com.br.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.